Active clinical trials for "Pulmonary Embolism"

Anticoagulation is the most important treatment for pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE). The thromboembolism risk is especially high in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations. However, there's no agreement on the most appropriate duration of anticoagulation in COPD with PTE to balance the risk of recurrence of thrombosis and bleeding. This randomized, controlled trial aims to evaluate the risk and benefit of prolonged anticoagulation compared with the regular 3-month anticoagulation in COPD with PTE.

A standardized diagnostic strategy of pulmonary embolism will be applied to eligible patients, incorporating a clinical probability score (revised Geneva score), plasma D-dimer assay and if necessary, a multidetector-row CT angiography thoracic and venous ultrasound of the lower limbs. All the patient with a pulmonary embolism diagnosed or not, will be followed for 3 months.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) represents a promising technique but can not be used as an alternative test to multidetector CT in patients with suspicion of pulmonary embolism (PE) due to its low sensitivity and high proportion of inconclusive MRI. The purpose of this study is to evaluate diagnostic performances of MRI combined with venous ultrasonography of the legs in patients with suspicion of PE.

Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the imaging method of choice to rule out acute pulmonary embolism based on its high sensitivity and specificity. Unfortunately, CTPA uses iodinated contrast media and can provoke contrast induced nephropathy. On the other hand, Computed tomography uses ionising radiation and is responsible for the half of the radiation exposure coming from medical sources. Recent studies have proven that low-dose CTPA protocols using Computed tomography tube energy of 80 kVp and reduced volume of iodinated contrast media provide an increased vessel signal and good image quality at a significantly reduced patient exposure. However, there are no data on the sensitivity of low-kVp protocols. The aim of this prospective randomized trial is to detect any difference between a normal-dose and a low-dose CTPA protocol in the diagnostic accuracy in the detection of acute pulmonary embolism (PE).

Comparison of capillary whole blood INR determined by LumiraDx Instrument to venous plasma INR determined by laboratory reference method (IL ACL ELITE PRO) for method comparison and assessment of accuracy and bias by regression analysis and other analytical methods.

This is a prospective comparison of clinician dosing and a pharmacogenetic algorithm in diagnosed patients requiring warfarin therapy.

The aim of the study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of 99mTc ThromboView® SPECT imaging for the detection of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients for whom there is a moderate to high clinical suspicion for PE.

To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of two major, widely used technologies, radionuclear imaging (ventilation-perfusion scanning) and pulmonary angiography, for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

This is a randomized-controlled open-label trial comparing two different doses of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in pregnant patients with a history of previous venous thromboembolism (VTE). Both doses are recommended doses in the 2012 guidelines of the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP), but it is not known which dose is more efficacious in preventing recurrent venous thromboembolism in pregnancy. Patients enter the study and will be randomized as soon as a home test confirms pregnancy. LMWH will be administered until 6 weeks postpartum. Follow-up will continue until 3 months postpartum. Patients will be recruited by their treating physician, either an obstetrician or internist.

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. The risk of death of untreated PE is approximately 25%. On the other hand, anticoagulant treatment is associated with a haemorrhagic risk (2% of major haemorrhagic accidents per year, of which 10% are fatal). A diagnostic accuracy is therefore necessary. Two approaches are available to diagnose PE: A functional approach, represented by pulmonary ventilation / perfusion scintigraphy (V / P), which looks for the functional consequences of PE. The main disadvantage of this approach is that there is a high rate of non-diagnostic examinations. On the other hand, it allows a mapping of pulmonary perfusion at the microcapillary scale, and thus allows the quantification of the vascular obstruction index, which would be an independent risk factor of PE recurrence. A morphological approach, represented by CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA), which allows the visualisation of the clot itself. This approach is currently the most used but has some limitations, including a risk of over-diagnosis of pulmonary embolism and the inability to reliably quantify the index of vascular obstruction. Lung subtraction iodine mapping CT is a new technique allowing, during the realization of a CTPA, without additional irradiation, to provide a mapping of the iodine. This mapping of iodine could potentially be used to evaluate pulmonary perfusion. It would then be possible to obtain, during a single examination, in addition to the anatomical information of the thoracic angioscan, information on the pulmonary perfusion and thus to assess the functional consequences of PE. No study to date has evaluated the performance of the pulmonary subtraction CT for the evaluation of pulmonary perfusion in the context of acute pulmonary embolism suspicion.