Active clinical trials for "Emergencies"

The direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and particularly the FXa inhibitors are a concern in patients presenting with type A aortic dissection as this may contribute to severe bleeding complications. The antidote andexanet alfa (Ondexxya®) can interact with the heparin- anti-thrombin III (ATIII) complex which may neutralize the anticoagulant effect of heparin and the use of andexanet alfa before surgery necessitating heparin-anticoagulation has been reported to cause unresponsiveness to heparin. The investigators have preliminary in-vitro data demonstrating the ability to remove apixaban from reconstituted blod by hemadsorption and are now analyzing if aFXa inhibitor levels may be reduced by hemadsorption in the clinical setting analyzing this in patients using FXa inhibitors being operated acutely for type A aortic dissection.

ED-initiated buprenorphine with brief intervention and facilitated referral to treatment has been shown to be highly successful in increasing treatment engagement rates and reducing opioid use among adults. It is unknown whether this intervention is similarly effective for adolescents with OUD. To rigorously examine this important clinical research question, it is first necessary to optimize this intervention for the adolescent population. In this R34 proposal, we will use the Assessment-Decision-Administration-Production-Topic Experts-Integration-Training-Testing (ADAPT-ITT) framework-a systematic method for intervention adaptation- to adapt (Aim 1) and test the feasibility (Aim 2) of a treatment strategy for adolescents that has been shown to effectively link adults with OUD to ongoing addiction treatment.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID -19) is the largest public health crisis in over a century. There is an urgent need for high-quality population-level data to understand modifiable risks for disease severity, transmissibility, and to develop evidence-based prevention (i.e. vaccination), treatment and resource allocation strategies. The Canadian COVID-19 Emergency Department Rapid Response Network (CCEDRRN) created a population-based registry of suspected and confirmed consecutive cases of COVID-19. The purpose of this registry is to derive and validate clinical decision rules, evaluate diagnostic tests and vaccine effectiveness, and complete cohort, case-control and observational studies to inform the pandemic response.

This study is investigating the effect of intraoperative Noradrenaline on cardiac preload and stroke volume, after initial fluid resuscitation, in order to assess whether there is a masked preload responsiveness and ultimately whether the correction of this potential preload-responsiveness with fluid therapy will translate into increased tissue perfusion in emergency laparotomy.

A randomized, double-blind, active-compared phase Ш clinical trial to evaluate clevidipine butyrate injectable emulsion in the treatment of Hypertensive Emergency and Sub-emergency.

This is a prospective four-site cohort study, which will accrue adults with symptoms concerning for acute coronary syndrome over a period of 12 months. After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, Physicians will complete HEART Pathway and EDACS risk assessments on eligible participants. Major adverse cardiac events as defined by our study will be assessed at 30 days using electronic health record, telephone contact, and national death and health events search. Outcomes for all patients will then be matched against the existing pathway of care for acute chest pain that is being used currently to compare diagnostic accuracy of both scores to diagnose low risk chest pain in this population. The objective of this study is to compare the test performance of the HEART and EDACS pathway in a large cohort of patients presenting to the Emergency department with chest pain in the United Arab Emirates and to determine if either accelerated diagnostic pathway can achieve a negative predictive value of ≥99% for 30-day MACE as well as to externally validate EDACS-ADP and the HEART pathway in the UAE population and gain further insight into the applicability of these decision-making aids in different clinical settings in order to assess which score is best suitable for the UAE population. Our third objective is to compare the effectiveness of both scores to the existing framework for chest pain work up in each hospital and have the opportunity to unify Emergency Departments in their chest pain pathways in the UAE. The investigators will be testing the null hypothesis that there is no difference in using the EDACS-ADP to safely classify patients to low-risk category and early discharge from the ED versus the HEART pathway.

This proposal aims to describe research that will utilize first aid in primary education students and will attempt to identify the frequency with which the training should be repeated and the type of trainer who will carry out the training program.

The use of serum biomarkers in the setting of the emergency department (ED) has been well characterized over the years as an adjunctive tool for the clinician in the setting of complex decision making. In this regard, the serum dosage of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) has been evaluated in a series of successful multicenter prospective studies as a potentially useful marker of, respectively, glial and neuronal damage in the setting of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), which is defined as a brain injury (concussion) secondary to trauma with a GCS (Glasgow coma scale) score of 13-15. It seems that both markers are detectable in serum less than 1 hour after the traumatic event, with highest levels appearing at around 2 hours, and are capable of distinguishing between patients with traumatic brain injury from those without acute brain injury after trauma. Furthermore, they seem to possess a high negative predictive value for detection of intracranial injuries at head CT-scan as well as the need of neurosurgical intervention after head trauma. Mild traumatic brain injury is one of the most frequent chief-complaints for patients presenting to emergency departments worldwide. At present, head CT scan is the gold standard diagnostic test for the identification of potentially life-threatening intra-cranial injuries. Although effective in the identification of serious lesions which might require neurosurgical intervention or in-hospital prolonged observation, the extensive use of head CT scan in mTBI has been questioned due to the potential risks related to radiation exposure, as well as unnecessary deployment of ED resources and increased costs, considering that the prevalence of CT-detected intra-cranial injury in mTBI is around 5-10%. For this reason, a number of international clinical guidelines suggest several Clinical Decision Rules (CDR) and algorithms to guide the clinician in the correct management of these patients, in particular in the difficult feat of identifying those patients who don't need to perform neuroradiological evaluation (CT scan or MRI) in the setting of the ED, without the risk to overlook potentially fatal brain injuries. The adjunctive role of these biomarkers has been well characterized in the setting of mTBI. It seems they correlate well with neurological damage as well as with the presence of CT abnormalities, and it seems that they might perform better than clinical evaluation alone. Nonetheless, according to current international guidelines and several systematic reviews and meta-analysis, patients who present with mTBI and risk factors for bleeding and delayed bleeding (such as known coagulopathy, patients on blood thinners or advanced age), need to perform CT scan plus clinical observation or even serial CT scans when the risk of delayed bleeding is considered to be high according to clinical evaluation of the ED physician and according to local standard-of-care and clinical practice. The execution of serial CT scans can be time consuming, expensive for the health-care services, and might pose a significant radiological risk for patients; furthermore, this risk might be unjustified considering that the prevalence of development of late intra-cranial bleeding in patients with risk factors who perform a second head CT scan during observation in the ED is considered to be around 2%. Nonetheless, in this category of patients, clinical observation and the repetition of a second head CT scan is felt to be the safest course of action for patients in order not to overlook potentially fatal injuries. Ideally, a clinical decision algorithm which takes into consideration a serum biomarker with a high negative predictive value for brain injury might aid the clinician to reduce the number of useless CT scans, therefore reducing the observation time in the ED as well as the exposure to ionizing radiations for the patients, while not increasing the number of missed delayed bleedings. At present, the role of GFAP and UCH-L1 in the risk stratification of patients with risk factors for delayed cerebral bleeding after mTBI has not been evaluated yet.

Over 200,000 children have a 911 Emergency Medical Services (EMS) activation for respiratory distress each year, most of whom have acute wheezing. Early treatment in the prehospital setting could more rapidly relieve respiratory distress symptoms, prevent hypoxia, reduce invasive interventions, and reduce the need to be hospitalized, thereby facilitating earlier return to normal daily activities. Preliminary data from one site found hospital admission was reduced from 30% to 21% among children when an EMS system introduced a pediatric asthma protocol with oral dexamethasone. The current standard for Emergency Department (ED) treatment for acute wheezing for children two and older includes inhaled ipratropium and dexamethasone. These treatments have a longstanding history of safety and are effective in preventing hospitalization when used early in the ED. Specific treatment protocols generally direct prehospital care. Ipratropium and dexamethasone are recommended by national EMS organizations that develop model protocols for prehospital care. However, only 25% of EMS agencies from large US metropolitan areas allow ipratropium, and only 10% include dexamethasone in their treatment protocols. A clinical trial is critically needed to evaluate whether the significant EMS resources required to implement interventions for children with life-threatening wheezing that have proven benefit in the ED result in improved patient outcomes. The overall objective of this three-site pilot trial is to address specific questions related to the implementation of the study and ensure its feasibility. The study will be conducted in the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) EMS Affiliates (EMSAs). The investigators will include patients aged 2-17 who have a 911 call for acute life-threatening wheezing. The specific aims are 1) to develop and produce a prehospital checklist for the treatment bundle, including ipratropium and dexamethasone, 2) to determine the feasibility of collecting patient outcomes for wheezing children treated in the EMS system, and 3) to evaluate the implementation of the EMS treatment bundle and checklist using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Our overall hypothesis is that the study will be feasible to implement. This study will provide the necessary data to ensure the eventual trial is feasible, primarily by establishing the ability to measure the outcomes of interest as well as evaluating implementation. This study is innovative by focusing on pediatric care in the prehospital environment, a critical component of our emergency care system that is often neglected in research.

Ophthalmic emergencies are acute vision-threatening disorders, for which a delay in prompt emergency response could result in catastrophic vision loss. Triage is an effective process for ensuring that timely emergency care is provided despite limited resource by prioritizing patients to appropriate orders for visits. Historically, registered nurses classify emergency patients based on personal experiences with high variation. Additionally, primary healthcare providers have been conventionally at the forefront of providing first aid care. However, most of ocular emergencies are wrongly diagnosed or referred due to non-eye specialists' limited knowledge and training in the ophthalmology. Here, the investigators established and validated an artificial intelligence system, EE-Explorer, to triage eye emergencies and assist in primary diagnosis using metadata and ocular images. This system has been integrated into a website to be prospectively validated in the real world.