Active clinical trials for "Emergencies"

Examine the analytical and clinical performance of Atellica IM TnIH assay for the diagnosis and rule out of acute myocardial injury and myocardial infarction in patients presenting to the emergency department in whom serial cTnI measurements are obtained on clinical indication.

This study will prospectively compare the mean Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain score reduction amongst three recommended dosing strategies of intravenous ketamine (0.1 mg/kg, 0.2 mg/kg, and 0.3mg/kg) for acute pain in the emergency department (ED).This study will also examine the frequency of adverse events secondary to ketamine including fatigue, dizziness, nausea, headache, feeling of unreality, changes in hearing or vision, mood changes, generalized discomfort, and hallucinations, changes in vital signs. Subgroups for exploratory analysis based on the need for rescue analgesia within two hours of ketamine administration, adequate pain relief, previous opioid tolerance, and age (adults < 65 years old and > 65 years old).

End-of-life (EOL) care has garnered increasing recognition and acceptance in the field of emergency medicine. Some emergency departments (EDs) in Singapore have instituted or plan to institute EOL care as part of the workflow. However, the EOL protocols are not standardised across all these EDs. The adherence to and quality of EOL care have not been formally measured in all institutions. Hence, gaps to improve the quality of care have yet to be determined. The aims are to systematically measure the current quality of EOL care in three Singapore hospital EDs and identify the quality gaps; formulate interventions to address these gaps and implement the improved EOL care; and measure the improvement post-implementation. The investigators hypothesise that the current quality of EOL care in three EDs is suboptimal and the interventions planned will improve the quality of care provided. The study team plans to conduct an interrupted time series study to detect whether the interventions have an effect significantly greater than any underlying trend over time. The quality of care indicators to be measured are timely identification of patients who require EOL care, adequacy of symptom control based on compliance to prescriptions, opportunities to discuss and develop an individualised care plan, perceived quality of care by healthcare providers and next-of-kin, and cost effectiveness. Planned interventions include refining the protocol with collaboration of content experts in palliative care, education and training of healthcare providers, and addressing specific gaps identified to improve cost effectiveness. The results of this study will form the standardisation and foundation for establishing the national benchmark for quality of EOL care in Singapore EDs.

To compare length of stay (LOS) of pediatric patients in a pediatric emergency room presenting with Gastroenteritis treated with IV rehydration versus oral Speedlyte rehydration.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether oral olanzapine is safer (fewer adverse events) and more effective (shorter time to sedation) than conventional haloperidol or diazepam when used in the management of acute agitation in the emergency.

It is estimated that epistaxis results in 4.5 million emergency department visits per year throughout the United States. Due to the adverse effects of standard treatment options for epistaxis, tranexamic acid (TXA) may be considered an attractive option. In previous studies, when used with nasal packing, TXA showed faster time to control of bleeding. The goal of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of topical intranasal TXA applied via atomizer for patients with epistaxis who present to the emergency department.

The objective of this trial is to evaluate postoperative intermediate care versus ward care in patients who have undergone emergency abdominal surgery with a perioperative Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score ≥ 10 (high risk patients). Patients will be enrolled in the trial, if they are ready to be discharged from the recovery unit or intensive/intermediate care unit to the surgical ward within 24 hours after surgery. Discharge criteria will be according to the Danish national recommendation. The intermediate care bed in the trial is defined by a certain minimum requirements to patient observation and described treatment possibilities which have to be available to the intermediate bed. If the treatment exceeds these treatment possibilities, the patient will be classified as an intensive care patient. The intermediate care bed will be placed at an intensive care unit, recovery unit or a surgical high dependency unit. If there is no available intermediate care bed, the patients will not be randomized, but only registered as "excluded because of no available intermediate care bed". Hypothesis: Postoperative intermediate care for 48 hours or more will reduce the 30-day mortality in emergency abdominal surgery patients with a high risk of postoperative organ failure. Interim analysis: An independent Data Monitoring and Safety Committee (DMSC) will conducted the interim analysis based on the analysis of the primary outcome blinded for intervention allocation. The DMSC will use P<0.001 (Haybittle-Peto) on two subsequent interim analyses as the statistical limit to guide its recommendations regarding early termination of the trial for benefit or harm. The first interim analysis will be conducted when the 30 days follow-up data of about 50% (i.e., about 200 patients) of the trial participants have been obtained and/or 75 deaths have been documented during the trial. If P<0,001 in the first interim analysis a second interim analysis will be conducted when the 30 days follow-up data of about 75% (i.e., about 300 patients) of the trial participants have been obtained and/or 25 deaths have been documented during the trial. Trial terminated on the 30th November 2012. The Data Monitor Committee found a very low overall event rate of the primary outcome at the first interim-analysis as compared to the pre-trial estimated. This precluding any possibility to detect or reject the anticipated relative risk reduction of 34 % as used in the sample size estimation.

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of Azimilide on the incidence of cardiovascular hospitalizations, cardiovascular emergency department visits or cardiovascular death in patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICDs)

Cervical spine trauma is a frequent reason for consultation in emergency medicine. It concerns approximately 10,000 patients admitted to the emergency room each year in France. There are two types of cervical spine trauma: penetrating and non-penetrating. Non-penetrating injuries are the most frequent and can be classified according to the mechanism involved. Whiplash is the most common type of trauma in emergency medicine. The injuries associated with this type of trauma predominate in the mobile spinal segment and are most often benign: only 2 to 3% of conscious patients consulting the emergency room actually present with cervical injuries such as fractures, dislocations or unstable sprains. In emergency medicine, the paradigm is therefore to identify patients at risk of complications, minimizing the need for unnecessary and radiating imaging. Although cervical spine trauma is a frequent reason for emergency room visits, the incidence of anatomical lesions is generally low and the X-rays prescribed most often do not show any abnormality. For cervical lesion screening to be safe and effective, the screening rules must have a high sensitivity, a low negative likelihood ratio, and a low false positive rate. Two clinical prediction rules have been extensively evaluated in the literature to guide imaging for nonpenetrating cervical injuries: the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) rule and the Canadian C-Spine 5 rule. The NEXUS rule4 applies to any clinically stable patient (Glasgow Coma Scale 15, systolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg, and respiratory rate between 10 and 24/min) presenting to the emergency department with a nonpenetrating trauma. The criteria constituting the NEXUS clinical rule are: Absence of tenderness on palpation of the posterior cervical midline ; Normal state of alertness (Glasgow Coma Scale 15); Absence of focal neurological deficit; Absence of signs of intoxication; Absence of distracting pain (other pain that may mask neck pain, e.g., long bone fracture). If these 5 criteria are present, the risk of cervical spine injury is low and no imaging is recommended. The Canadian C-Spine 5 rule applies to patients who are 16 years of age or older; conscious with a Glasgow Coma Scale of 15; stable (systolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg and respiratory rate between 10 and 24/min); and have had head or neck trauma in the past 48 hours. As soon as the rules of clinical prediction do not make it possible to rule out the hypothesis of a spinal injury, the exploration of cervical trauma traditionally involves the performance of radiographic images. They must include the following incidences: face, profile and open mouth centered on the cervico-occipital hinge ("open mouth odontoid"). Nevertheless, the sensitivity of these conventional radiographs for the detection of cervical spine lesions is poor, about 50%. Thus, the use of standard radiographs is usually limited to conscious, ambulatory patients at low risk of spinal injury. Conversely, the cervical CT is the reference examination for the detection of spinal bone lesions with a sensitivity close to 100%. Its sensitivity is superior to that of radiographic images in both high-risk and low-risk patients with spinal injuries. Difficulty of access and exposure to ionizing radiation, which is lower with standard radiography, generally influence the choice of imaging in the emergency room. In December 2020, the French High Authority for Health published a sheet on the relevance of cervical imaging in the context of non-penetrating cervical trauma. This sheet proposes a practical table according to the precise clinical context of the patient as well as the best first-line imaging. These good practice recommendations were part of an approach to improve the relevance of care. Cervical spine imaging for patients admitted to the emergency department for non-penetrating cervical spine trauma was recommended in one of the following situations patient 65 years of age or older ; patient unstable or with consciousness disorders or neurological signs; imaging recommended by one of the following two rules: NEXUS or Canadian C-Spine; a history of ankylosing spine (ankylosing spondylitis, hyperostosis, etc.), even in case of "minor" trauma; if a cervical artery dissection is suspected. Investigator's hypothesis is that the HAS recommendations of good cervical imaging practices for non-penetrating cervical trauma are difficult to apply routinely in emergency departments for several reasons: the frequency of consultations for cervical trauma, the limited availability of emergency CT scans, and the fear of radiation and unnecessary additional costs in emergency situations. Investigators wish to determine the actual rate of application of the clinical rules recommended by the HAS in the GHPSJ emergency department and the factors predicting their non-application by the GHPSJ team of emergency physicians.

The combined administration of high dose of oral betamethasone and nebulization of adrenaline seems to be an attractive therapeutic alternative for reducing the rate of hospitalization for acute bronchiolitis treated in the emergency department. However, it is essential to confirm the trend previously observed with this treatment before using it in current practice.