Active clinical trials for "Emergencies"

The provision of analgesia to patients in pain is a fundamental necessity of emergency department practice and is usually accomplished using IV opioids. However, significant barriers exist to the provision of timely analgesia by the IV route. The use of the IN route for medication delivery provides an efficient and relatively painless mode of analgesia delivery. As well, ketamine is well-known to be an effective analgesic and to preserve cardiorespiratory function thus removing the necessity of physiologic monitoring that is obligatory when using opioids. The use of ketamine by the IN route provides a rapid, easy-administered and well-tolerated method for providing analgesia in the ED setting.

Hip Fracture (HFx) is a painful injury that is often treated in the Emergency Department (ED) with intravenous opiates. However, this class of medications may cause deleterious side effects. An alternative analgesic approach involves regional anesthesia. The investigators attempted to determine (1) whether ultrasound guided peripheral nerve blocks (UPNBs) could be safely performed in an ED setting, (2) whether UPNBs would be more effective than standard treatment in controlling pain from HFx and (3) which of two UPNBs was superior for pain relief. A convenience sample of patients with an isolated HFx and a pain score > 5/10 were enrolled and randomized to one of three arms: (1) Ultrasound guided 3-in-1 femoral nerve block (UFNB), (2) Ultrasound guided fascia iliaca compartment block (UFIB), or (3) IVMS. Patients indicated their pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain).

Kidney stone is one of the most common diseases in every human society and also Iran. What is normally used to treat renal colic pain is Intravenous Opioid with a variety of side effects including hypotension, respiratory depression and apnea, nausea and vomiting. Regarding less complications of Intravenous Acetaminophen, we aimed to compare it with Intravenous Morphine in management of renal colic pain.

Sedation and pain medication is required when bone fractures need to be fixed in the emergency department (ED). Many drugs have been used safely as single agents or in combination for the sedation of children. These drugs include Propofol, Ketamine and Fentanyl. However each of these medications has side effects and drawbacks. The combination of Propofol and Fentanyl (Fentofol) has never been compared directly with the combination of Propofol and Ketamine (Ketofol) for painful procedures in the ED, and the goal of this study is to determine which combination works better. The primary outcome of this study is to determine which drug combination has a shorter time from onset of sedation to full recovery. The investigators hypothesize that Fentofol will have shorter sedation to recovery times.

The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of Ranolazine for the treatment chest pain from disease of small vessels of the heart also known as 'microvascular angina'.

The aim of the study is to compare the safety & efficacy of low dose ketamine and morphine versus morphine alone for acute generalized pain in the Emergency Department (ED). The investigators are also interested to investigate whether low-dose ketamine is a safe and effective alternative option to opioids for the acute treatment of pain in the Emergency Department. The agents that are available in the department includes acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAIDS) and opioids. In most cases, acetaminophen and NSAIDS are not adequate to manage acute pain crisis. There is also heightening concerns for increased opioid use or abuse by patients. Since the HCAPHS survey includes various questions which inquires about patient perception of pain management in the department, the investigators are interested in investigating the safety and efficacy of low-dose ketamine to as an alternative method to opioids for the acute management of pain. There has been limited, mostly observational pilot studies, published in the literature. Limited data in the literature have reported the incidence of nausea and vomiting ranged from 3-13%. All published literature administered low-dose ketamine as an intravenous push. To the best of our knowledge our study would be the first study to administer low-dose ketamine as a short bolus infusion to mitigate the incidence of nausea and vomiting. The investigators believe our study would provide important scientific data to fill the theoretical gap that low-dose ketamine at 0.3mg/kg/dose may be a safe and effective agent for acute pain management in an ED that is located in the center of a densely populated urban area.

Migraine headaches are a common problem for children. When treatment at home fails, children may benefit from intravenous treatment administered in a hospital setting like the Emergency Department. Most treatments used however have only been tested in adults and the best treatment strategy for children is not always clear. The combination of more than one medication is frequently prescribed in Canadian Emergency Departments. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the combination of ketorolac (an anti-inflammatory pain medication) and metoclopramide (an anti-nauseant that may also relieve migraine headaches) is better than metoclopramide by itself.

The purposes of this study are to compare the effects on ovarian activity of quick starting a Combined Oral Contraceptive Pill (COCP) after ellaOne® or placebo intake.

The aim of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of telemedically supported and delegated pain therapy in the Emergency Medical Service (EMS).

This research project examines the effectiveness of different video laryngoscopes in a out-of-hospital emergency intubation. Since in preclinical airway management severe incidents with esophageal failures of intubation may partly happen or rather endotracheal Intubation may completely fail, it is of great importance to evaluate alternative ways of endotracheal intubation in out-of-hospital emergency medicine. Video laryngoscopy has been proven in everyday clinical practice and may clinically be superior in most situations when compared to endotracheal Intubation using a conventional laryngoscope. No data exist, if different video laryngoscope types perform differently in the out-of-hospital setting. The investigators hypothesize that there would be no difference with regard to intubation time, intubation success, and intubation morbidity between different models of video laryngoscopes.