Active clinical trials for "Emergencies"

Paramedics and EMT will be recruited among four Emergency Medical Services (EMS) in Switzerland to manage a 10-minutes simulation-based adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest scenario in teams of two. Depending on randomization, each team will manage the scenario according either to their current approach (30 compressions with 2 bag-mask ventilations), or to the experimental approach (continuous compressions since the start of CPR except for rhythm analysis and shock delivering, with early insertion of an i-gel® device to deliver asynchronous ventilations). The main hypothesis is that early insertion of i-gel could improve CCF during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, with a reasonable time to first effective ventilation.

The purpose of this study is to: Compare the effect of paracetamol alone against Paracetamol+Codeine association against the association of paracetamol + Cafeine in the treatment of post-traumatic acute pain of the limbs.

Background Hindsight bias and outcome bias may play an important role in retrospective law of errors in Emergency Medicine and may affect judgement. In addition, differences in sex and medical history may affect treatment decisions (implicit bias). Aims First, to assess if and to what extent knowledge of an outcome may affect the ability of Emergency Physicians and physicians with experience in disciplinary law to determine the quality of care given. Secondly, to investigate whether a medical history with nonspecific/functional/somatoform complaints and sex differences affect clinical decision making in Emergency Physicians. Study design and analyses A web-based cross-sectional survey using vignettes with six clinical scenarios (four vignettes for outcome/hindsight bias, four vignettes for implicit bias). The survey was sent to all Emergency Physicians and residents in training in the Netherlands. Four scenarios were also sent to physicians with experience in disciplinary law. In four vignettes, participants received a scenario without an outcome, or with a positive or negative outcome. They were asked to rate the quality of care provided as sufficient or insufficient and, in more detail, poor/below average/average/good/outstanding and how likely they thought it would be that the patient would have had a negative outcome (in percent). In the other two vignettes, participants received one vignette describing a scenario of a patient presenting to the ED with acute abdominal pain and one vignette describing a scenario with chest pain. The sex and medical history differed among the participants (e.g. male/female, nonspecific medical history/somatic medical history). Participants were asked whether they would prescribe pain medication, and whether they would do diagnostic imaging. Importance and impact This research may help to understand the impact of knowing the outcome in retrospective laws in Dutch Emergency Physicians and physicians with experience in disciplinary law. If outcome and hindsight bias are present, retrospective judgement may need a different approach in medicine, i.e. blinding judges for the outcome, to prevent wrong justice and adverse effect on clinicians well-being. Also, if implicit bias in sex and medical history is present, a training programme is needed to reduce certain bias and to improve equality in the provided care.

This is a pragmatic controlled clinical trial taking place in the first phase of COVID-19 lockdown re-opening in Spain. Patients of 52 chiropractic clinics were invited to participate in a pseudo-random order (one out of every three contacted patients) as they were contacted to either schedule an appointment with their current chiropractor or not, depending on the clinic's and the patient's availability. Patients would receive chiropractic in-person care (one or more than one visits) or no care at all, for a two-week period. According to the care received, they were assigned to one of three groups (receiving no care, receiving care once, and more than once). Participants filled an online questionnaire with self-reported outcome-measures at the beginning of the two week period. A follow-up questionnaire was completed 14 days after.

Diabetes mellitus is a common chronic disease. It is estimated that up to 40% of adults may develop diabetes in their lifetime. Patients with poorly controlled blood sugars often visit the emergency department for treatment of potentially dangerous and life-threatening complications of diabetes, including "diabetic ketoacidosis" (DKA), a condition where the body does not have enough insulin or cannot effectively use the insulin that is produced. As a result, the body produces a chemical called "ketones" as another source of energy, which increase the acid levels of blood and impairs organ function throughout the body. In the emergency department, patients with DKA are usually treated with insulin and large amounts of intravenous fluid. Recent research suggests the fluid type used may be important in treating DKA. Normal saline (0.9% sodium chloride) is the most commonly used intravenous fluid in treating DKA, but it has a very high concentration of chloride and can lead to additional acid production when given in large volumes. Ringer's lactate is another type of intravenous fluid that more closely matches the chemistry of fluid in our bodies and in theory, does not increase the acidity of blood. While there may be benefits to giving Ringer's lactate instead of normal saline, past studies have included very few patients and thus, definite recommendations on preferred fluid type still cannot be made. This study's research question is: In adults with DKA, does giving Ringer's Lactate result in faster resolution of DKA compared to normal saline? The investigators hypothesize that patients who are given Ringer's Lactate will have faster resolution of DKA. If the hypothesis is correct, results will provide scientific proof that current diabetic ketoacidosis guidelines should change with respect to fluid choice. In this study, patients with DKA presenting to the emergency department will be randomly assigned to receive either normal saline or Ringer's Lactate. As this is an exploratory (pilot) study, the main goal is to ensure that a larger study will be practical and feasible on a scale involving multiple emergency departments across Canada. Completion of a larger study across multiple sites with more patients will improve our understanding of how fluid choice influences patient-important outcomes such as faster resolution of DKA (meaning patients can leave hospital sooner), fewer admissions to the intensive care unit, fewer deaths and fewer cases of permanent kidney damage. A total of 52 participants (26 per group) will be recruited for this pilot trial. This pilot study will assess the practicality of enrolling patients in London and help identify barriers and problems with running a larger trial. The overall goal is to determine if Ringer's Lactate will resolve DKA faster than normal saline. If this is true, patients may spend less time in the hospital, which benefits both individual patients and the healthcare system overall. If this hypothesis is correct, findings could provide high-level proof to change current practice guidelines and affect DKA management globally.

The effectiveness of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) to reduce pain scores for patients with acute back pain in an ambulatory emergency department (ED) population will be examined in this dual-center, cluster randomized, controlled, open-label study.

The primary objective is to demonstrate reversal of the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran in patients treated with dabigatran etexilate who have uncontrolled or life-threatening bleeding requiring urgent intervention, and in patients treated with dabigatran etexilate who require emergency surgery or other invasive procedure. The secondary objectives are to assess the reduction or cessation of bleeding, evaluate the clinical outcomes, safety and the pharmacokinetics of dabigatran in the presence of idarucizumab.

Compare intramuscular (IM) ketamine to a combination of IM midazolam and haloperidol with regards to the time required for adequate behavioral control, in minutes, in patients presenting to the emergency department with psychomotor agitation and violent behavior.

The Valsalva Assist Device (VAD) is a simple hand held device, designed to assist in the physical treatment of a common, fast heart rhythm disorder called supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). This treatment, called the Valsalva manoeuvre (VM), is a safe, physical technique involving a forced exhalation against resistance (like that required to blow up a balloon). This causes a reflex slowing of the heart and can correct attacks of SVT (cardioversion). It is an internationally recommended initial treatment but previously has had a low success rate (5-27%) and patients often have to be taken to hospital for drug treatment. Recent hospital research has demonstrated that a VM carried out using a certain level of strain pressure(40mmHg) measured with a blood pressure manometer, combined with a simple postural modification (the modified VM) gives a far better chance of success (43%) and avoids the need for drug treatment. More practical methods of generating this strain such as blowing on an empty syringe have been used but are unreliable. The Valsalva Assist Device (VAD) has been designed to provide the correct resistance and is packaged with instructions for the modified VM. Attacks of SVT frequently occur without warning in otherwise healthy people. Patients are often initially seen by ambulance staff and so the use of the VAD therefore represents an opportunity to provide ambulance clinicians with instructions for the modified VM and a means to deliver the correct strain in one, easy to use device. The investigators plan to test use of the device in patients with an attack of SVT and attended by paramedics or other pre-hospital practitioner, compared to current recommended practice. This project will provide important feasibility and recruitment data for a definitive trial, assessing the performance of the VAD on SVT cardioversion and conveyance (transfer to hospital) rates.

This study is a clinical trial of moderate sedation versus deep sedation with propofol for procedural sedation in the Emergency Department. The purpose of this study is to compare the rate of amnesia and respiratory depression rate in patients who receive moderate sedation to those that receive deep sedation.