Active clinical trials for "Enteritis"

This is a Phase 3, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the efficacy and safety of lirentelimab (AK002), given monthly for 6 doses, in patients with moderately to severely active Eosinophilic Gastritis and/or Eosinophilic Duodenitis (formerly referred to as Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis) who have an inadequate response with, lost response to, or were intolerant to standard therapies

Probiotic bacteria inhabit the gastrointestinal tracts of healthy individuals and may improve the health status of patients with digestive disease. The first aim of our study will seek to determine if probiotics medication (Bio-Three) inhibit gastrointestinal infection and reduce its inflammatory response in the intestine. The second aim will explore the bacterial count (microbiology) and subsequent immune response in probiotic inhibition of enterocolitis in children. We try to seek to gain an advanced understanding of probiotics versus pathogenic microorganism and host interactions, and mucosal immune responses to probiotics in the intestine.

This is a Phase 2, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study to assess the effects of AK002, given monthly for 4 doses. It is hypothesized that AK002 is more effective than placebo control (alternative hypothesis) in reducing the number of eosinophils per high power field (HPF) in gastric and/or duodenal biopsies before and after receiving AK002 or placebo versus no difference between AK002 and placebo control (null hypothesis).

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Benralizumab (Anti-IL5RA) in Subjects With Eosinophilic Gastritis.

This is a Phase 3, open-label, extension study to assess the long term efficacy and safety of lirentelimab given monthly.

This is a Phase 1, single-center, open-label, single ascending dose study to assess the PK, safety, and tolerability of SYN-020 delayed release capsules administered orally to healthy adult male and female subjects with a BMI of 18.5 to 27 kg/m2. Up to 36 subjects will participate, in each of up to 6 sequential cohorts. Single doses of 5, 15, 45, and 150 mg SYN-020 are planned in Cohorts 1 through 4, respectively. Cohorts 5 and 6, if enrolled, will receive doses that were well tolerated in an earlier cohort to determine the effect of BMI and/or a high-fat meal on the SYN-020 PK profile. For each cohort, eligible subjects will be admitted to the clinic on Day -1, and receive study drug in the morning of Day 1. For PK analysis, blood and feces will be collected before dosing and for up to 96 hours (blood) or 120 hours (feces) after dosing. Subjects will be discharged from the clinic after the End of Study procedures are completed on Day 6.

To assess safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of multiple dosesin patients with Bacterial Enteritis caused by Clostridium difficile infection(CDI) or Enteric infection.

Patients with lymphocytic enteritis (LE), HLA-DQ2/8+, negative celiac serology and clinical and histological response to a gluten-free diet (GFD) do not fulfil the diagnostic criteria of coeliac disease (CoD). At present it remains unclear whether they suffer from coeliac gluten sensitivity (CGS) or non-coeliac gluten sensitivity (NCGS). There are specific tissue markers of CoD such as anti-transglutaminase deposits (tTG) and intraepithelial lymphocytes expressing T-cell receptor (TCR) gamma/delta+. Aim: To demonstrate the existence of CGS in these patients despite having negative celiac serology. Methods: Double-blind randomized clinical trial of gluten vs placebo rechallenge for 6 months in patients with LE on a GFD. Inclusion criteria: >18 years, initial presentation with GI symptoms, HLA-DQ2/8+, negative celiac serology, good clinical and histological response to GFD. Patients were randomised to gluten (20 g/day) and placebo (maltrodextrin) (identical powder sachets mixed with meals). Clinical symptoms were analysed using visual analogue scales. Quality of life (GIQLI), adherence to diet, serology, and histological changes including gamma/delta+ IEL and tTG deposits were evaluated.

Children with complicated severe acute malnutrition (SAM), such as inability to take adequate feeds, infection and diarrhoea, require in-patient management. Despite following a well-established World Health Organisation (WHO) protocol, outcomes are poor. Case fatality often exceeds 20%. Amongst survivors discharged home, many subsequently die, have long-term poor growth or recurrence of SAM. It has long been recognized that children with SAM have intestinal inflammation and that this persists despite management according to WHO guidelines. The inflammation is thought to result from increased exposure to microbial pathogens in the gut in areas with poor sanitation. The damaged lining of the intestine impairs food digestion and absorption, likely allows gut bacteria to enter the blood stream to cause sepsis and also exposes the gut immune cells to microbial and food antigens causing the inflammation to persist. Failure to treat the intestinal inflammation is likely to contribute to the poor response to treatment and poor long-term outcomes in many children with SAM. The intestinal inflammation seen in SAM is very similar to that which occurs in food intolerance (e.g. intolerance to cow's milk protein) and inflammatory bowel disease. In these conditions, the inflammation is treated very effectively with hypoallergenic ("elemental") and anti-inflammatory ("polymeric") formulas. These are nutritionally complete feeds that have a similar composition to the feeds used for nutritional rehabilitation in SAM. We aim to undertake a pilot study to see if an elemental and/or polymeric formula are tolerated by children with SAM and help to reduce intestinal inflammation. We also aim to learn more about the intestinal inflammation in general that occurs in SAM by observing carefully the effect of these specific formulae and to do in-depth metabolic analyses.

In France, patients with benign viral infections (ie: gastro enteritis and/or rhinopharyngitis, etc.) often receive several prescriptions from their doctors, although there is evidence that these medicines are not efficient. We hypothesize that patients could be reassured by health advices, especially if they are written. In addition, we believe that doctors would feel less guilty for not prescribing drugs if they could hand written consultation reports to patients, in these situations. We aim to assess the impact of handing to patients with viral gastroenteritis or upper respiratory tract infections, a copy of the consultation report on their medicine consumption.