Active clinical trials for "Enterobacteriaceae Infections"

Enterobacterales resistant to carbapenem are cause of severe concern in hospital-acquired infections since therapeutic options are limited. Recently approved drugs, such as bela-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor, have been the drug of choice. However, its use is limited in low- and middle-income countries. Thus, therapy of these infections mostly relies on polymyxins and other old drugs. The role of adjuvant carbapenem therapy in combination with polymyxins, aminoglycosides and other drugs is under investigation. From a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD), there is an elevated probability that high-dose, extended infusion administered meropenem reach the PK/PD target of 40% above the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the pathogen when the MIC is 32mg/L or lower (non-susceptible isolates have MICs of 4mg/L or higher). However, the MIC is not routinely determined in clinical laboratories. In addition, high-level (above 32mg/L) resistance to carbapenems have been reported in many studies. This open-label, randomized clinical trial aim to assess if the addition of meropenem to the best available therapy can increase the number of days alive and free of hospitalization in patients with bloodstream infections by Enterobacterales with MIC of meropenem above 32mg/L.

This is a prospective multi-center study. Bacterial isolates from hospitalized patients with CA-HRE will be compared to those from hospitalized patients with healthcare-associated HRE (HA-HRE). In addition, community spread of CRE will be determined.

Open-label, single center, prospective interventional non-comparative study for CRE carriers.

The aim of this study to predict carbapenem resistant Klebsiella spp. earlier in our patients monitored in our Intensive Care Unit in the future, using artificial intelligence. Patients with bloodstream infection and pneumonia caused by Klebsiella spp. will be comparatively examined in two groups, as sensitive and resistant. Resistance will be attempted to be predicted with deep machine learning.

The antimicrobial crisis is a real problem. Infections produced by multiresistant bacteria are becoming more and more frequent, and available antimicrobial agents are usually scarce. Reducing the duration of antimicrobial treatments is one of the most efficient measures to control the antibiotic pressure and to optimise the use of these agents. Bloodstream infections produced by Enterobacteria (EB) are very frequent, but the optimal duration of antibiotics to treat them is unknown, as long as no clinical trials have been specifically developed to answer this question. Basing on expert opinions, the Infectious Diseases Society pf America (IDSA) recommends the bacteremia by EB secondary to vascular catheter infections to be treated for 7 to 14 days. This represents a variability of up to 100%. No recommendations have been published regarding the duration of treatment of bacteremia from other sources. The objective of this project is to prove that the 7-day course of treatment for EB bacteremia is more efficient and equally safe than the 14-day scheme.

2:1, open-label, single center, randomized controlled trial comparing FMT vs. no intervention for CRE carriers,

The continuous increase in the bacterial resistance rate and the slow arrival of new therapeutic options have turned into an antibiotic crisis. One of the strategies proposed by stewardship programs to try to change this situation described worldwide is the use of antibiotics with the lowest possible antimicrobial spectrum. Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia is a good example of how this strategy would be applied. The empirical treatment of nosocomial bacteremia by Enterobacteriaceae comprises in several cases one or two antibiotics with antipseudomonal activity, being much less common than desirable a subsequent change to narrower spectrum antibiotics based on susceptibility data ("de escalation"). This is because the safety of de escalation is based only on expert advice and some observational studies, so their efficacy and safety is questioned by many clinicians and therefore its use is lower than desired. In fact, a recent systematic review of the Cochrane Library concluded that randomized studies to support this practice are needed. Investigators propose a "real clinical practice-based" randomized trial to compare the efficacy and safety of continuing with an antipseudomonal agents vs. de-escalation according to a pre-specified rule, in patients with bacteraemia due to Enterobacteriaceae.

Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) are bacteria that have become resistant to carbapenems by producing enzymes that break down carbapenems. The prevalence of CRE continues to rise globally but the treatment options are extremely limited. In case series, isolation of CRE from any site, whether there is clinical infection or not, has been associated with all-cause hospital mortality ranging from 29% to 52%. There are no known methods for reliably decolonizing gastrointestinal (GI) CRE. In rare case reports, fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) has successfully eradicated gastrointestinal colonization of CRE, but there has been no larger study further investigating this. FMT via oral capsules is the least invasive method and has demonstrated efficacy and short-term safety in treating patients with recurrent Clostridium difficile infections. Therefore, the investigators propose this pilot study to determine the effectiveness of oral capsule fecal transplantation in the decolonization of gastrointestinal CRE.

This is an observation study comparing prospective use of Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam (IMI/REL) to retrospective data using Meropenem/Vabobactam (MVB)and Ceftazidime/Avibactam CZA) in treatment of Klebsiella Producing Carbapenemase Enterobacteriaceae infections at a tertiary care hospital. The objectives of the study are to demonstrate successful treatment of KPC containing Enterobacteriaceae infections with IMI/REL including in bacteremia, and to analyze treatment outcomes in use of IMI/REL for KPC-producing infections compared to historical clinical outcome data with CZA and MVB use at the same institution.

Multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae producing extended-spectrum β-lactamases (hereafter called ESBLs) have emerged as an important cause of bloodstream infection in hospitalized patients and urinary tract infections in the community. As is the case with other multidrug-resistant organisms chronic colonization is frequent, in the case of ESBLs mostly intestinal and urinary carriage. To the investigators knowledge no randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial has been performed to study the efficacy of a systematic ESBL eradication strategy. Eradication of ESBL carriage would cause benefits for the individual patient - by reducing the risk of infection - and for the community - by reducing transmission. Even if eradication turns out to be impossible, transient suppression of ESBL might reduce the likelihood of transmission and thus still be beneficial from an ecologic perspective. The purpose of the proposed study is to test the hypothesis that the administration of a 10 day course of oral antibiotics active against ESBLs can lead to decolonization of ESBL carriage in hospitalized patients.