Active clinical trials for "Hernia"

This is a RCT on drain versus no drain after laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal hernioplasty. We will assess the difference in seroma formation after surgery in 2 two groups by an independent assessor clinically and radiologist to document the size of seroma after surgery. Other secondary outcomes will be measured including post-operative pain, discomfort, analgesic used, patient satisfaction, recurrence of hernia, wound infection, etc.

Despite of technological advances in surgery, incisional hernia and bowel obstruction remain frequent surgical complications. To date, the relationship between these two types of surgery and the occurrence of incisional hernia remains unclear. This is an observational study to evaluate outcomes of incisional hernia with respect to the incision site and adhesion-related bowel obstruction after open and laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Hypothesis: TIGR mesh as a reconstruction material is a more effective mesh for the repair of the abdominal wall post lipectomy, transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) / deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap.

There are a variety of methods to repair inguinal hernias. Each has its advocate and may confer advantages to individual patients. Postoperative pain, convalescence, recurrence, and economics have all been evaluated however none in a randomized blinded fashion. Recently, investigators have attempted to address some of these concerns with new prosthetic materials. The preferred method of repair currently employs a tension free technique using mesh prosthesis. The approach as advocated by Lichtenstein involves reinforcing the floor of the inquinal canal with an onlay mesh. Newer approaches use a double layer mesh that reinforces the floor in a preperitoneal and onlay technique (Prolene Hernia System) while obliterating the internal inguinal ring or by the Mesh Plug repair (bioresorbable or permanent) which reinforces the inguinal floor with an onlay mesh while obliterating the internal inguinal ring. Currently no study has compared these techniques for ease of performance, postoperative pain, convalescence, quality of life, or cost in a randomized double blinded fashion. NMCP is uniquely qualified to compare these repairs prospectively and blinded to best assess the most cost effective approach which causes the least pain. A prospective double-blinded randomized trial comparing the Lichtenstein onlay mesh technique to Prolene Hernia Sytem (PHS), Mesh Plug Repair (MPR), or Gore Bioresorbable plug for postoperative pain, duration of convalescence, cost, impact on quality of life and ease of performance is proposed. Impact on quality of life will be assessed serially with the SF 12 which is a validated survey used with serial measures in the acute setting.

This study will determine whether laparoscopic and open hernia repair have the same recurrence and complication rates in the under 60yr old age group. The overall financial costs of each repair will also be compared.

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of HQ® Matrix Soft Tissue Mesh for the Treatment of Inguinal Hernia. Half of participants will receive HQ® Matrix Soft Tissue Mesh, while the other half will receive ULTRAPRO® Partially Absorbable Lightweight Mesh.

This study is comparing the outcomes patients undergoing LVHR, PFC as opposed to a bridged repair with assessment of patient reported satisfaction and function at 6 months of follow-up.

The aim of this RCT is to compare patient outcomes of inguinal hernioplasty under Local Anaesthesia alone versus Local Anaesthesia and Conscious Sedation Specific study objectives are to determine the effect of conscious sedation on: (i) patient satisfaction (ii) postoperative pain (iii) time to discharge (iv) intraoperative complications (v) postoperative functional status (vi) short-term postoperative complications (vii) long-term postoperative complications

This prospective randomized is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of hernia repairs using local anesthesia compared with those using general anesthesia for patients with incarcerated hernia.

In our study, a multicenter randomized controlled，single blind trial will be performed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of these three procedures for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation.