Active clinical trials for "Carpal Tunnel Syndrome"

The objective of the study is to evaluate in patients suffering from carpal tunnel syndrome resistant to medical treatment, clinical course after percutaneous treatment under ultrasound guidance. 40 patients will be included in the study. The following parameters will be evaluated: patient satisfaction, pain, functional disability, quality of life and time to return to work. The medico-economic aspect will be analyzed.

Prospective controlled clinical trial in which a minimally invasive microsurgical approach was used following the keyhole principle in 55 patients and 65 hands under local anesthesia and ambulatory strategy. All patients included in the study had an average of 3 months disease course and were considered refractory to conservative treatment. Patients were evaluated with stringent inclusion criteria with the Levine severity and functional status scale with a 2 year follow-up. Descriptive outcomes on the efficiency of this procedure are reported.

Carpal tunnel syndrome is a common peripheral entrapment neuropathy, this study aims to investigate if, and to what extent local ozone therapy could offer symptom improvement in scleroderma patients with Carpal tunnel syndrome

This pilot study will evaluate the latency of onset and duration of sensory-motor block in patients undergoing hand surgery. Patients will be randomized to receive nerve blocks of the distal forearm or of the distal and proximal forearm. Local anesthetic will be injected to anesthetise the median and ulnar nerves in the distal forearm (1-injection site group) or the median and ulnar nerves in the distal and proximal forearm (2-sequential injection sites group) to accomplish anesthesia for surgery on the hand.

Hypothesis: When comparing superficial infiltration of local anesthetic to superficial and deep infiltration of local anesthetic in the setting of carpal tunnel release, the null hypothesis is that there will be no significant difference between the two techniques. Background and study rationale: Carpal tunnel syndrome is a very common clinical problem with significant patient burden that can be reliably treated with surgical carpal tunnel release. To minimize operating room time burdens and to improve patient recovery time, this procedure is generally performed with the patient wide awake using local anesthetic. While the majority of patients are able to tolerate this type of procedure, there is always a possibility of some discomfort or pain experienced during the procedure. The investigators would like to compare two local anesthetic infiltration techniques to determine which is best to provide the least amount of pain or discomfort during a carpal tunnel release. The two methods are subcutaneous infiltration alone (superficial) and subcutaneous infiltration with infiltration into the carpal tunnel (deep). Research Design: This study design is a prospective randomized control trial. Methodology: Patients will be recruited and randomized on the morning of their surgery to undergo either superficial or superficial and deep local anesthetic infiltration using 10cc of 1% lidocaine with epinephrine buffered with 8.4% sodium bicarbonate. They will be blinded as to which group they are in. Participants will complete the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire as a baseline for comparison as well as a brief questionnaire on demographics. After the procedure, participants will complete a short questionnaire about any pain experienced during the administration of the local anesthetic and during the procedure. Presence and intensity of pain during the procedure are the primary outcome of this study. Secondary outcomes include pain rating at 2, 8, and 24 hours post-procedure and a follow up Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire score at 3 months. The surgeon will also make note whether there is any visible evidence of damage to the median nerve from deep infiltration at the time of surgery. Statistical Analysis: The two groups (superficial vs. deep) will be compared directly for each of the outcomes listed in the methodology.

This is a randomized controlled trial in a cohort of Egyptian patients suffered from mild to moderate idiopathic carpal tunnel. They were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1: patients received ultrasound-guided platelet-rich plasma injection and group 2 patients received ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection. The outcome measures were assessed via Visual Analogue Scale, the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire, electrophysiological findings in sensory and motor function of the median nerve and morphological changes of median nerve detected by ultrasound.

This study will propose a novel approach to treat pregnant women with mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) using the recently introduced High intensity laser therapy with its deep penetration and high-power characteristics. It's hopeful that the results of this study can fill the gap of knowledge surrounding the conservative treatment options for CTS in order to help patients restore their nerve function properly and promote new ways of addressing CTS.

carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common compression syndrome in the upper extremities, CTS is characterized by typical anatomic changes, the most probable swelling of the median nerve in the proximal part of the CT. Local infiltration of corticosteroids easily leads to atrophy of the median nerve, subcutaneous fat, and systematic complications, surgical treatment decision is always taken by the patient who sometimes wants to delay or avoid the surgery because of psychological or medical concerns, It would be interesting if low molecular weight sodium hyaluorinate injection is used as an alternative conservative treatment of CTS. This study aims to investigate if, and to what extent, hydro-dissection using 1% lidocain followed by injection of Sodium hyaluronate versus 1% lidocain followed by injection of 40 mg of triamcinolone acetonide, under ultrasound guidance.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the use of bupivacaine and lidocaine as local anesthetics in carpal tunnel release surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are: Are there any differences in pain after surgery? Are there any differences in postoperative analgesic consumption?

The purpose of this study is to determine if any difference exists among 3 different postoperative splinting regimens- no splint, removable splint, and plaster non-removable splint- following mini-open carpal tunnel release (CTR) surgery.