Sequentional Immuno Apheresis Plasma Volume Escalation Cohort Study of Reduction of Soluble Tumor...
Stage IV Non-small Cell Lung CancerStage IV Melanoma2 moreSequential immune apheresis plasma volume escalation cohort study of reduction of soluble Tumor Necrosis Factors Receptors 1/2 (sTNFR1/2), with or without Nivolumab, in patients with inoperable or metastatic solid Tumors. This study evaluates Immunicom fs LW-02 device used with Spectra Optia apheresis system, aiming to answer two different study questions: Safety, tolerability and effectiveness of the device. Safety, tolerability and effectiveness of the device, employed as monotherapy, or combined with Nivolumab.
A Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability and Antitumor Activity of X4P-001 in Combination With...
Triple Negative Breast CancerObjectives Phase 1b Primary Objectives: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of X4P-001 combined with toriplimab in patients with locally advanced or metastatic TNBC Secondary Objectives: To characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) profile of X4P-001 alone or combined with toriplimab To characterize the antitumor activity of X4P-001 in combination with toriplimab in patients with locally advanced or metastatic TNBC(according to RECIST 1.1) To characterize the overall survival of X4P-001 in combination with toriplimab in patients with locally advanced or metastatic TNBC To characterize the immunogenicity of toriplimab when administrated in combination with X4P-001
Tislelizumab in Combination With Eribulin for Patients With Metastatic Previously heaviLy-treAted...
Triple Negative Breast CancerTriple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) lacks effective treatment options due to the absence of traditional therapeutic targets.This study is a multicentre, prospective trial. The primary objective of the trial was to evaluate the objective response rate to tslelizumab combined with eribulin in different subgroups(subgroup A: TMB High, B: PD-L1 positive,C, immunomodulatory (IM),D,NanoString superiority,E,other types)of relapse or metastasis TNBC after failure of second-line chemotherapy. Therefore, exploring new therapeutic options and identifying subgroups of patients who may benefit from special treatments has been a focal point of research. Doing so, we expect to guide new investigation efforts in this area.
A Study of TQB2450 Injection Combined With Anlotinib Hydrochloride Capsule Versus Paclitaxel for...
Triple Negative Breast CancerThis study is a randomized, positive parallel controlled, multicentre phase III clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TQB2450 combined with anlotinib versus paclitaxel for injection (albumin bound) in subjects with advanced triple negative breast cancer.
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Combined With Anti-PD-1 Antibody in Metastatic Triple Negative...
Metastatic Breast CancerThe objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerance of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Combined With Anti-PD-1 Antibody in Patients in Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer
Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation as Adjuvant Treatment for Triple Negative Breast...
Triple-Negative Invasive Breast CarcinomaResidual TumorTriple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) refers to any breast cancer that does not express estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) or Her2/neu. Its incidence is approximately 180,000 cases per year. TNBC are known to be more aggressive with poor prognosis specially when no pathologic complete response (pCR) is achieved after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with a higher risk of recurrence and a poor survival once that recurrence occurs. On the other hand, there is not a specific adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment for these patients. Since autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) allows the usage of higher doses of chemotherapy, which results in higher cellular destruction with a decrease of hematological toxicity, it is proposed that this procedure is able to improve prognosis in TNBC patients with no pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Carboplatin and Eribulin Mesylate in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Patients
Estrogen Receptor-negative Breast CancerHER2-negative Breast Cancer9 moreThis phase II trial studies how well giving eribulin mesylate and carboplatin together before surgery works in treating patients with stage I-III triple-negative breast cancer. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as eribulin mesylate and carboplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving chemotherapy before surgery may make the tumor smaller and reduce the amount of normal tissue that needs to be removed.
Safety and Tolerability of Everolimus in Combination With Eribulin in Triple-negative Breast Cancers...
Triple Negative Breast CancerTreatment of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) relies heavily on different regimes of chemotherapeutic agents but remains one of the most challenging subtypes to treat because of the lack of specific therapies. Despite being sensitive to chemotherapy, many women with TNBC relapse quickly, developing locoregional recurrence or visceral metastasis. Toxicity and chemotherapy resistance are still major limitations in the treatment of patients with TNBC. Despite current trend of targeted therapy development, cytotoxic agents are a mainstay of treatment of patients with breast cancer. Further research into new combination of different compounds is needed in order to maximise benefit, whilst minimising toxicity. The phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway is associated with resistance to a variety of anti-tumor agents. This has been described pre-clinically with cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents with varying mechanisms of action including taxanes, and DNA-damaging agents. In the clinic, activated PI3K in tumors has been correlated with decreased response to therapy and worse clinical outcomes. The recent biological findings suggest that a PI3K/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors may increase the efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents which are considered standard of care (SOC) for the treatment of several solid tumors. The study by the Unitaed state Oncology Research of Huston and the Sarah Cannon Cancer Center randomized 1830 patients with high risk breast cancer to the standard adjuvant treatment with adriamicin cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel versus the experimental adjuvant treatment with adriamicin taxotere (AT) followed by paclitaxel. At 5-years of follow up, the AT followed by paclitaxel produced significantly better overall survival (p=0.054) and improved disease free survival (DFS) (p=0.19). Among TNBC patients both DFS (74% versus 79%, p=0.1) and overall survival (OS) (79% versus 84%, p=0.037) were better in experimental arm. However, the main reasons for patients being taken off study treatment were toxicity (85 patients in the control arm and 128 in the experimental arm) and consent withdrawal (18 patients in the control arm and 30 patients in the experimental arm). For this reason, research into alternatives has intensified, thus resulting in the discovery and development of new compounds with a more tolerable profile as compared with paclitaxel. Among the total of 762 patients enrolled into Eisai Metastatic Breast Cancer Study Assessing Physician's Choice Versus E7389 (EMBRACE) trial, 19% had TNBC. Of note, eribulin was most effective in hormone receptor-negative patients and in TNBC patients, who had a 29% risk reduction. Treatment with eribulin was well tolerated. Neutropenia, leucopenia, peripheral neuropathy, and asthenia/fatigue were the most common adverse events reported at Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grades 3 and 4. Neutropenia was the most common adverse events reported at CTCAE grade 4 in the eribulin group (24.1%). Based on findings to date, eribulin is an attractive agent, and its role in combination with new compounds such as everolimus deserves further investigations. Their combination might lead to more profound effects on tumor cell biology of triple negative metastatic breast cancer. During the course of the trial, dose reductions for each combination will be permitted in patients who cannot tolerate the starting dose
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Docetaxel With or Without SELUMETINIB in Patients With Triple Negative...
Triple Negative Breast CancerThe purpose of this study is to increase survival of patients with early and locally advanced triple-negative breast cancer adding selumatinib to standard preoperative chemotherapy regimen.
Trial of Afatinib With Paclitaxel for Neoadjuvant Therapy of TNBC and Research of Biomarkers of...
Triple Negative Breast Cancer[Background]: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is defined by a lack of expression of both estrogen and progesterone receptor as well as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2). TNBC is characterized by distinct molecular, histological and unfavorable clinical features despite the high rates of response to chemotherapy. Based on the above reasons, it is important to emergently develop novel therapies and/or treatment strategies to increase treatment efficacies and the survival rate of TNBC. [Rationale]: Overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR/ErbB1) and EGFR mutation have been reported in TNBC and may therefore be a valid target for anti-tumor therapy in TNBC. Afatinib (BIBW 2992) is an ErbB-family blocker that irreversibly inhibits signaling from all relevant ErbB-family dimers. Afatinib has demonstrated preclinical activity in triple-negative breast cancer cell lines and xenograft models of breast cancer, and clinical activity in phase I studies. Based on the assumption that uncontrolled ErbB-signaling is directly related to an increased oncogenic potential in TNBC, the studying afatinib in the neoadjuvant treatment of TNBC patients is important and provides a novel therapy. [Aims] The primary endpoint is to evaluate the pathologic complete response of the combination of afatinib and weekly paclitaxel in TNBC patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment. The secondary endpoints are to evaluate the clinical response and safety of afatinib with and without paclitaxel, and to explore the different afatinib-affecting downstream molecular pathways as well as potential biomarkers predicting the response of afatinib with and without paclitaxel. [Patients and methods]: Patients with TNBC (clinical T2-T3, N0-N1, M0; clinical T1-3, N1-2, M0; or any T4a tumor) and received neoadjuvant treatment will included in this open, label, multi-center phase II study. Our schema is as follows: (1) Afatinib 40 mg per day for 14 days, then evaluation, every subject will go into the following phase no matter whether she had response or not (2) the following phase (the combination with afatinib and paclitaxel): Afatinib 40 mg per day, day 1 to day 21, in combination with paclitaxel 80 mg/m² on days 1, 8, 15 in a 3-weekly course. In addition to the clinical assessment, we will evaluate the potential predictive biological markers of activity of Afatinib with and without paclitaxel and dynamic changes of molecular makers ([serum and tissue samples: before treatment, 2 weeks after treatment, and operation timing]; potential molecules, such as EGFR, EGFR-signaling, FGFR, FGFR-signaling, ERK, p53, NF-κB, and etc. were evaluated through the immunohistochemical stains, mutation analysis, mRNA [RT-PCR], single nucleotide polymorphism analysis, and FISH analysis). In addition, the genetic expression profiles will be compared between afatinib-responsive and afatinib-unresponsive samples. [Expected Results]: The promising clinical activity, tolerable toxicity, and potential biomarkers of afatinib with and without paclitaxel in TNBC patients receiving neoadjuvant setting will be demonstrated. The results from this study can be used to conduct a larger trial that would allow us to confirm or validate the hypotheses generated.