search

Active clinical trials for "Polycythemia"

Results 31-40 of 227

An Efficacy and Safety Study of Luspatercept (ACE-536) Versus Placebo in Subjects With Myeloproliferative...

Myeloproliferative DisordersMyelofibrosis3 more

The purpose of this Phase 3 study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Luspatercept compared with placebo in subjects with myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN)-associated Myelofibrosis (MF) and anemia on concomitant Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) inhibitor therapy and who require red blood cell count (RBC) transfusions. The study is divided into Screening Period, a Treatment Phase (consisting of a Blinded Core Treatment Period, a Day 169 Response Assessment, a Blinded Extension Treatment Period, and an Open-label Extension Treatment Period), and a Posttreatment Follow-up Period. Following the Day 169 Response Assessment, subjects who did not show clinical benefit will have the option to unblind. Subjects who were on placebo during the Blinded Core Treatment Period will have the opportunity to crossover into the Open-Label Extension Treatment Period and receive Luspatercept.

Recruiting47 enrollment criteria

The TAPS Trial - Fetoscopic Laser Surgery for Twin Anemia Polycythemia Sequence

Twin Anemia Polycythemia Sequence

This multicenter open-label randomized controlled trial is set up to evaluate the effect of fetoscopic laser surgery on the gestational age at birth for monochorionic twin pregnancies diagnosed with twin anemia-polycythemia sequence. Half op the patients will be treated with fetoscopic laser surgery, while the other half will be managed with standard treatment. The hypothesis is that fetoscopic laser therapy will improve neonatal outcome by prolonging pregnancy.

Recruiting8 enrollment criteria

INCB000928 Administered as a Monotherapy or in Combination With Ruxolitinib in Participants With...

AnemiaPost-essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis1 more

This Phase 1/2, open-label, dose-finding study is intended to evaluate the safety and tolerability, PK, PD, and efficacy of INCB000928 administered as monotherapy or in combination with ruxolitinib in participants with MF who are transfusion-dependent or presenting with symptomatic anemia. This study will consist of 2 parts: dose escalation and expansion.

Recruiting18 enrollment criteria

Effect of Dose Fractionation of Testosterone Cypionate on Transgender Men With Erythrocytosis

TestosteroneTranssexualism1 more

A transgender man is someone with a male identity who were born with a vulva and vagina. The acquisition of masculine characters can come from surgery or from the use of testosterone. Despite the benefit of using this hormone in relation to hair development, muscle mass gain and changes in voice timbre, its use can cause an increase in the hematocrit (Ht) level. When erythrocytosis occurs (Ht ≥ 50%), the currently proposed conduct is the suspension of cross-hormonization for 3 months, which has negative effects on the affirmation process. This project aims to assess whether reducing the dose of testosterone cypionate by half (100mg/15d) can mitigate the negative outcomes caused by the suspension with the benefit of reducing the hematocrit level in trans patients who developed erythrocytosis using testosterone. This is a pilot study that will compare the intervention (testosterone cypionate 100 mg, fortnightly) to the suspension of the drug, both for 3 months, with the main outcome being the hematocrit level. Hormonal and biochemical levels and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HAD) will also be evaluated in patients treated at the Gender Incongruence Outpatient Clinic of the Hospital das Clínicas of the Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto.

Recruiting5 enrollment criteria

Evaluation of HU-resistance in Adult Patients With Polycythemia Vera Who Meet PV-AIM Predictors...

Polycythemia Vera

The purpose of this study is to confirm the predictive factors for hydroxyurea (HU) failure (hemoglobin (HGB) <15.5 g/dL (9.62 mmol/L) and red cell distribution width (RDW) ≥17%) identified by machine learning in the polycythemia vera advanced integrated model (PV-AIM) project in the real-life setting

Recruiting22 enrollment criteria

An Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase 1b/2 Study of the Safety and Efficacy of KRT-232 Combined With...

Myelofibrosis

This is a phase 1b/2 study of KRT-232 combined with ruxolitinib in subjects with MF who have a suboptimal response after at least 18 weeks of treatment with ruxolitinib. The primary objective of the study is to determine a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of KRT 232 in combination with ruxolitinib.

Recruiting10 enrollment criteria

AVAJAK: Apixaban/Rivaroxaban Versus Aspirin for Primary Prevention of Thrombo-embolic Complications...

Polycythemia VeraEssential Thrombocythemia3 more

Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are frequent and chronic myeloid malignancies including Polycythemia Vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF) and Prefibrotic myelofibrosis (PreMF). These MPNs are caused by the acquisition of mutations affecting activation/proliferation pathways in hematopoietic stem cells. The principal mutations are JAK2V617F, calreticulin (CALR exon 9) and MPL W515. ET or MFP/PreMF patients who do not carry one of these three mutations are declared as triple-negative (3NEG) cases even if they are real MPN cases. These diseases are at high risk of thrombo-embolic complications and with high morbidity/mortality. This risk varies from 4 to 30% depending on MPN subtype and mutational status. In terms of therapy, all patients with MPNs should also take daily low-dose aspirin (LDA) as first antithrombotic drug, which is particularly efficient to reduce arterial but not venous events. Despite the association of a cytoreductive drug and LDA, thromboses still occur in 5-8% patients/year. All these situations have been explored in biological or clinical assays. All of them could increase the bleeding risk. We should look at different ways to reduce the thrombotic incidence: Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOAC)? In the general population, in medical or surgical contexts, DOACs have demonstrated their efficiency to prevent or cure most of the venous or arterial thrombotic events. At the present time, DOAC can be used in cancer populations according to International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) recommendations, except in patients with cancer at high bleeding risk (gastro-intestinal or genito-urinary cancers). Unfortunately, in trials evaluating DOAC in cancer patients, most patients have solid rather than hematologic cancers (generally less than 10% of the patients, mostly lymphoma or myeloma). In cancer patients, DOAC are also highly efficient to reduce the incidence of thrombosis (-30 to 60%), but patients are exposed to a higher hemorrhagic risk, especially in digestive cancer patients. In the cancer population, pathophysiology of both thrombotic and hemorrhagic events may be quite different between solid cancers and MPN. If MPN patients are also considered to be cancer patients in many countries, the pathophysiology of thrombosis is quite specific (hyperviscosity, platelet abnormalities, clonality, specific cytokines…) and they are exposed to a lower risk of digestive hemorrhages. It is thus difficult to extend findings from the "general cancer population" to MPN patients. Unfortunately, only scarce, retrospective data regarding the use of DOAC in MPNs are available data. We were the first to publish a "real-life" study about the use, the impact, and the risks in this population. In this local retrospective study, 25 patients with MPN were treated with DOAC for a median time of 2.1 years. We observed only one thrombosis (4%) and three major hemorrhages (12%, after trauma or unprepared surgery). Furthermore, we have compared the benefit/risk balance compared to patients treated with LDA without difference. With the increasing evidences of efficacy and tolerance of DOAC in large cohorts of patients including cancer patients, with their proven efficacy on prevention of both arterial and venous thrombotic events and because of the absence of prospective trial using these drugs in MPN patients, we propose to study their potential benefit as primary thrombotic prevention in MPN.

Recruiting17 enrollment criteria

A Study of Ruxolitinib in Combination With Abemaciclib for the Treatment of Myelofibrosis

Myelofibrosis Due to and Following Polycythemia Vera

The study is being done to see if the combination of ruxolitinib and abemaciclib is a safe and effective treatment for people with primary or post-polycythemia vera/essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis.

Recruiting36 enrollment criteria

A Trial of Fedratinib in Subjects With DIPSS, Intermediate or High-Risk Primary Myelofibrosis, Post-Polycythemia...

Primary MyelofibrosisPost-Polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis2 more

This is Single-Arm, Open-Label Efficacy and Safety Trial of Fedratinib in Subjects with DIPSS (Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System)-Intermediate or High- Risk Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF), Post-Polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis (post-PV MF), or Post-Essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis (post-ET MF) and Previously Treated with Ruxolitinib. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the percentage of subjects with at least a 35% reduction in spleen size and one of the secondary objectives is to evaluate the safety of fedratinib.

Active51 enrollment criteria

A Study of Momelotinib Versus Danazol in Symptomatic and Anemic Myelofibrosis Patients (MOMENTUM)...

Primary MyelofibrosisPost-polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis1 more

MOMENTUM is a randomized, double-blind, active control Phase 3 trial intended to confirm the differentiated clinical benefits of the investigational drug momelotinib (MMB) versus danazol (DAN) in symptomatic and anemic subjects who have previously received an approved Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) therapy for myelofibrosis (MF). The purpose of this clinical study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of MMB to DAN in treating and reducing: 1) disease related symptoms, 2) the need for blood transfusions and 3) splenomegaly, in adults with primary MF, post-polycythemia vera MF or post-essential thrombocythemia MF. The study is planned in countries including, but not limited to: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Italy, New Zealand, Poland, Romania, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, UK, and US. Subjects must be symptomatic with a MFSAF v4.0 Total Symptom Score of ≥ 10 at screening, and be anemic with Hgb < 10 g/dL. For subjects with ongoing JAKi therapy at screening, JAKi therapy must be tapered over a period of at least 1 week, followed by a 2-week non-treatment washout interval prior to randomization. Subjects will be randomized 2:1 to orally self-administer blinded treatment: MMB plus placebo or DAN plus placebo. Subjects randomized to receive MMB who complete the randomized treatment period to the end of Week 24 may continue to receive MMB in the open-label extended treatment period to the end of Week 204 (a total period of treatment of approximately 4 years) if the subject tolerates and continues to benefit from MMB. Subjects randomized to receive DAN may cross-over to MMB open-label treatment in the following circumstances: at the end of Week 24 if they complete the randomized treatment period; or at the end of Week 24 if they discontinue treatment with DAN but continue study assessments and do not receive prohibited medications including alternative active anti-MF therapy; or at any time during the randomized treatment period if they meet the protocol-defined criteria for radiographically-confirmed symptomatic splenic progression. Subjects randomized to receive DAN who are receiving clinical benefit at the end of Week 24 may choose to continue DAN therapy up to Week 48. The comparator treatment, DAN, is an approved medication in the US and in some other countries and is recommended by national guidelines as a treatment for anemia in MF.

Active48 enrollment criteria
1...345...23

Need Help? Contact our team!


We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs