Active clinical trials for "Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma"

The purpose of this study is to analyze esophageal cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant immunotherapy with chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy to determine whether additional adjuvant therapy is associated with improved survival outcomes.

This study is a phase III, multicenter, prospective randomized controlled clinical study comparing the efficacy of non-surgical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with radical chemoradiotherapy and radical chemoradiotherapy combined with consolidation chemotherapy. The survival time and side effects of patients were observed and compared.

Whether the introduction of immunotherapy can transform unresectable esophageal cancer into resectable, or even achieve R0 surgical resection, has not been reported yet. We plan to conduct a prospective, single-center, single-arm phase II clinical study of the safety and efficacy of tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

This study will test the safety of a drug called SGN-PDL1V in participants with solid tumors. It will also study the side effects of this drug. A side effect is anything a drug does to your body besides treating your disease. Participants will have solid tumor cancer that has spread through the body (metastatic) or cannot be removed with surgery (unresectable). This study will have three parts. Parts A and B of the study will find out how much SGN- PDL1V should be given to participants. Part C will use the dose found in Parts A and B to find out how safe SGN-PDL1V is and if it works to treat solid tumor cancers.

NEEDS is a pragmatic open-label, randomised, controlled, phase III, multicenter trial with non-inferiority design with regard to the first co-primary endpoint overall survival and superiority for the experimental intervention definitive chemoradiotherapy. A second co-primary endpoint is global health related quality of life (HRQOL) one year after randomisation. A third co-primary endpoint is eating restictions one year after randomisation. The aim is to compare outcomes after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with subsequent esophagectomy to definitive chemoradiotherapy with surveillance and salvage esophagectomy as needed in patients with resectable locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the esophagus, with the aim to provide generalisable guidance for future clinical practice.

The primary objective of this study is to assess the feasibility of treatment with bintrafusp alfa combined with definitive chemoradiation (carboplatin, paclitaxel and radiation) in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction.

The primary objective is to compare docetaxel plus cisplatin (DP) versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin (NP) in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, in terms of the overall survival and toxicity in patients with Stage IIB or III squamous cell esophageal carcinoma.

This is a randomized noninferiority multicenter trial. Patients will be stratified according to the participating hospital. Patients will be randomized to one of the treatment arms. Arm A: Patients will receive surgical resection, including Ivor Lewis esophagectomy or McKeown esophagectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy. Arm B: Patients will receive 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin-based chemotherapy concurrently with radiotherapy. Patients will receive cisplatin (45~60mg/m2) intravenously over 1 hour on day 1 and receive 5-FU (3,200 ~ 4,000mg/m2) intravenously for 4 to 5 days. Treatment will repeat every 3 weeks for 2 courses. Patients will receive a total of 45 Gy irradiation (5 days a week for 5 weeks). Patients will be followed at 3 and 6 months after randomization, then every 6 months for following 2 and half years (up to 3 years after randomization), and 4 and 5 years after randomization. After 5 years, annual follow-up is scheduled up to 10 years after randomization. We will analyze the results primarily with the intention-to-treatment(ITT) analysis, and then secondarily with the per-protocol(PP) analysis as well.

The aim of our study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NALIRI plus 5FU versus paclitaxel as a second-line therapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic ESCC who had failed to cisplatin- or oxaliplatin-based first-line chemotherapy. The hypotheses are as follows: H0: the percentage of patients alive at 9 months of 40% is not useful. H1: the percentage of patients alive at 9 months of 60% is expected.

This is a prospective single-arm study of endoscopic resection (ER) following concurrent chemoradiotherapy for stage I esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, to find if the treatment combination is useful by assessing its safety and efficacy.