search

Active clinical trials for "Esophageal Neoplasms"

Results 51-60 of 1263

Neoadjuvant Therapy of Camrelizumab Combined With Chemotherapy for Resectable Locally Advanced Esophageal...

Esophageal Carcinoma

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant therapy of camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy for resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Recruiting42 enrollment criteria

Rhomboid Intercostal and Subserratum Plane Block for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy

Esophagus Cancer

The objective is to investigate the safety and effectiveness of rhomboid intercostal and subserratum plane (RISS) block for postoperative analgesia after minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy (MIE-McKeown).

Recruiting12 enrollment criteria

Phase 2 Futibatinib in Combination With PD-1 Antibody Based Standard of Care in Solid Tumors

Locally Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic Esophageal Cancer

This is a nonrandomized, uncontrolled, open-label, multicenter Phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of futibatinib in combination with PD-1 antibody-based SoC therapy in adult patients with solid tumors.

Recruiting21 enrollment criteria

Utidelone and Anlotinib in Advanced Recurrent Metastatic Esophageal Cancer

Esophageal Cancer

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the safety, tolerance and efficacy of Utidelone combined with Anlotinib in patients with Advanced or Recurrent Esophageal Carcinoma who failed Standard first line therapy.

Recruiting34 enrollment criteria

Visualization Versus Intraoperative Neuromonitoring of the Recurrent Laryngeal Nerves During Thoracoscopic...

Esophageal Cancer

The clinical value of intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM) in thoracoscopic esophagectomy remains uncertain. The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to compare the impact of RLN visualization versus IONM on their morbidity following thoracoscopic esophagectomy.

Recruiting10 enrollment criteria

AN0025 and Chemoradiotherapy Combination in Esophageal Cancer

Esophageal Cancer

This is an open-label, multicenter, phase Ib study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of AN0025 in combination with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with locally advanced/locally recurrent esophageal cancer.

Recruiting13 enrollment criteria

Safety and Efficacy of Personalized Neoantigen Vaccine in Advanced Gastric Cancer, Esophageal Cancer...

Gastric CancerEsophageal Cancer1 more

This trial is an investigator-initiated, single-center, open-label, single-arm exploratory study of mRNA neoantigen tumor vaccine in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, esophageal cancer, and liver cancer, including two phases: dose escalation and dose expansion. To evaluate the safety and tolerability of neoantigen tumor vaccine in subjects with advanced gastric cancer, esophageal cancer and liver cancer by conducting dose escalation trial in subjects diagnosed with advanced gastric cancer, esophageal cancer and liver cancer, and preliminarily evaluate the efficacy of neoantigen tumor vaccine in subjects with advanced gastric cancer, esophageal cancer and liver cancer. According to the characteristics of safety and efficacy data in the dose escalation phase, the dose expansion is performed at the intended clinical dose based on the investigator's judgment, and the treatment is performed in combination with PD-1/L1 to further evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of neoantigen tumor vaccine at a specific dose. Both the dose escalation phase and dose expansion phase include a screening period (Week -4 ~ Week -2), a baseline period (Week -1 ~ Day -1), a treatment period (Day 1 ~ Week 8 or 16), and a follow-up period. Subjects who signed and provided the formal informed consent entered the screening period. The treatment period included the initial treatment period (Day 1 ~ Week 8) and the enhanced treatment period (Week 12 ~ Week 16). The investigator determined whether to enter the enhanced treatment period based on the comprehensive judgment of the subject's efficacy, safety, compliance and other factors from Week 8 to Week 12. The dose escalation phase follows standard 3+3 design. 12-18 subjects are expected to be enrolled at 3 given dose level. The investigator will choose the optimal clinical dose for dose expansion, which can be one dose group or multiple dose groups. PD-1/L1 drugs are used in parallel to further confirm the efficacy and safety of neoantigen tumor vaccine, with about 18 subjects. The usage and dosage of PD-1/L1 should aligned with the package insert.

Recruiting30 enrollment criteria

CPI-613 (Devimistat) in Combination With Hydroxychloroquine and 5-fluorouracil or Gemcitabine in...

Advanced Biliary Tract CarcinomaAdvanced Colorectal Carcinoma31 more

This phase II trial tests how well CPI-613 (devimistat) in combination with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or gemcitabine works in patients with solid tumors that may have spread from where they first started to nearby tissue, lymph nodes, or distant parts of the body (advanced) or that have not responded to chemotherapy medications (chemorefractory). Metabolism is how the cells in the body use molecules (carbohydrates, fats, and proteins) from food to get the energy they need to grow, reproduce and stay healthy. Tumor cells, however, do this process differently as they use more molecules (glucose, a type of carbohydrate) to make the energy they need to grow and spread. CPI-613 works by blocking the creation of the energy that tumor cells need to survive, grow in the body and make more tumor cells. When the energy production they need is blocked, the tumor cells can no longer survive. Hydroxychloroquine is a drug used to treat malaria and rheumatoid arthritis and may also improve the immune system in a way that tumors may be better controlled. Fluorouracil is in a class of medications called antimetabolites. It works by killing fast-growing abnormal cells. Gemcitabine is a chemotherapy drug that blocks the cells from making DNA and may kill tumor cells. CPI-613 (devimistat) in combination with hydroxychloroquine and 5-fluorouracil or gemcitabine may work to better treat advanced solid tumors.

Recruiting65 enrollment criteria

NUC-3373 in Combination With Other Agents in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumours

Advanced CancerAdvanced Solid Tumor15 more

This study is an open-label, multi-arm, parallel cohort, dose validation and expansion design. The study is modular in design, allowing evaluation of the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics (PK) of NUC-3373 in combination with other agents for the treatment of patients with different tumour types. Each module is designed to evaluate a different NUC-3373 combination and consists of a dose-validation phase (Phase Ib) and a dose-expansion phase (Phase II). Phase Ib of each module will determine the safety and tolerability of the combinations for further clinical evaluation in Phase II. Approximately 6-20 evaluable patients will be enrolled in the Phase Ib stage of each module to determine safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of NUC-3373 in combination with other agents. Each module will then move into Phase II to enable a further assessment of safety and efficacy in approximately 20-40 patients. Module 1 will assess NUC-3373 + leucovorin (LV) in combination with pembrolizumab for the treatment of patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumours who have progressed on ≤2 prior therapies for metastatic disease, that may have included 1 prior immunotherapy-containing regimen (either monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy) or who have not progressed but where addition of NUC-3373 + LV to standard pembrolizumab monotherapy may be appropriate (e.g., patients who could not tolerate post- immuno-oncology (IO) standard of care therapy). Module 2 will assess NUC-3373 + LV in combination with docetaxel for the treatment of patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or pleural mesothelioma who have progressed on, or were unable to tolerate, 1 or 2 prior lines of cytotoxic chemotherapy-containing regimens for advanced/metastatic disease. The opening of each module will be at the discretion of the Sponsor. Further modules may be added as non-clinical and clinical data become available to support additional NUC-3373 combinations and tumour types.

Recruiting66 enrollment criteria

mFOLFIRINOX Versus mFOLFOX With or Without Nivolumab for the Treatment of Advanced, Unresectable,...

Advanced Esophageal AdenocarcinomaAdvanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma13 more

This phase III trial compares the effect of modified fluorouracil, leucovorin calcium, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (mFOLFIRINOX) to modified fluorouracil, leucovorin calcium, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX) for the treatment of advanced, unresectable, or metastatic HER2 negative esophageal, gastroesophageal junction, and gastric adenocarcinoma. The usual approach for patients is treatment with FOLFOX chemotherapy. Chemotherapy drugs work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Fluorouracil stops cells from making DNA and it may kill tumor cells. Leucovorin is used with fluorouracil to enhance the effects of the drug. Oxaliplatin works by killing, stopping, or slowing the growth of tumor cells. Some patients also receive an immunotherapy drug, nivolumab, in addition to FOLFOX chemotherapy. Immunotherapy may induce changes in body's immune system and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Irinotecan blocks certain enzymes needed for cell division and DNA repair, and it may kill tumor cells. Adding irinotecan to the FOLFOX regimen could shrink the cancer and extend the life of patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancers.

Recruiting31 enrollment criteria
1...567...127

Need Help? Contact our team!


We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs