Olmesartan Medoxomil Versus Losartan in Elderly and Very Elderly
Essential HypertensionTo assess the efficacy of individually optimized doses of olmesartan medoxomil compared to losartan in elderly and very elderly patients with essential hypertension. The study hypothesis is non-inferiority of olmesartan medoxomil compared to losartan in lowering mean sitting diastolic blood pressure after 12 weeks of treatment compared to baseline. The study duration is up to 60 weeks, including a 52-week treatment period. After 12 weeks of treatment hydrochlorothiazide may be added to control blood pressure. Efficacy and safety measurements are carried out at up to 18 visits during the trial.
A Therapeutic Exploratory Clinical Study to Evaluate the Antihypertensive Efficacy of Fimasartan...
Essential HypertensionThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of Fimasartan (BR-A-657•K) during 24 hours by dose in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.
Efficacy/Safety of Amlodipine Plus Losartan Versus Losartan in Patients With Essential Hypertension...
HypertensionThe purpose of this study is to evaluate of efficacy and safety of amlodipine plus losartan and losartan alone in patients with essential hypertension inadequately controlled on losartan monotherapy.
Efficacy and Safety of Azilsartan Medoxomil and Chlorthalidone Compared to Olmesartan Medoxomil...
Essential HypertensionThe purpose of this study is to compare the antihypertensive effect of azilsartan medoxomil plus chlorthalidone, once daily (QD), to olmesartan medoxomil plus hydrochlorothiazide in participants with moderate to severe hypertension.
Efficacy and Safety of Aliskiren 300mg Compared to Irbesartan 300mg and Ramipril 10 mg in the Setting...
Essential HypertensionThe purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy (blood pressure lowering effect) and safety of aliskiren given to hypertensive patients after a missed dose.
Long Term Study of VAH631 in Patients With Essential Hypertension (Extension From B1303 Study)
HypertensionThis study is designed to provide long-term safety and efficacy data for the combination doses of VAH (VAL/ HCTZ) 40/6.25mg and 80/12.5mg in essential hypertensive patients. The 350 patients (approximately) who have successfully finished the core trial CVAH631B1303 and signed consent for the extension will be enrolled into this study.
Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and the Safety of Antihypertensive Tablets
Essential HypertensionThe purpose of this study is to determine the optimal dosage of the clinical trial which is evaluating the antihypertensive efficacy and the safety of OJP-2028 tablets in patients with the uncomplicated essential hypertension.
Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696A in Patients With Essential Hypertension
HypertensionThis study was a dose-ranging efficiacy study in patients with essential hypertension to assess the blood pressure lowering effect, and safety of LCZ696 compared to valsartan and placebo. The study will also evaluate the efficacy and safety of AHU377 as compared to placebo.
Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of a Vaccine Against Essential Hypertension
Mild Essential HypertensionModerate Essential HypertensionThe study medication CYT006-AngQb is a vaccine, consisting of angiotensin II (Ang II), the naturally occurring octapeptide coupled onto the surface of virus-like particles (VLP). This form of presenting Ang II to the immune system induces a B-cell mediated immune response characterized by the generation of specific antibodies (IgG and IgM) against Ang II. The CYT006-AngQb vaccine is administered by subcutaneous (s.c.) injection. Immunization against angiotensin II may offer a valuable alternative to conventional drugs for the treatment of hypertension.
To Assess the Effect of Naproxcinod Versus Naproxen and Ibuprofen on Arterial Blood Pressure in...
OsteoarthritisHypertensionTo assess the effect of naproxcinod vs. naproxen and ibuprofen on arterial blood pressure in patients with osteoarthritis and controlled essential hypertension