Active clinical trials for "Essential Hypertension"

The purpose of this study is to evaluate efficacy and safety of Irbesartan and Amlodipine combined therapy in patients with essential hypertension inadequately controlled on Irbesartan monotherapy

Phase 3 study to examine the relation between antihypertensive effect and baseline factors exploratively, compared to olmesartan medoxomil in patients with essential hypertension.

Randomized, Double-Blind, Multi-Center, Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Telmisartan/Amlodipine/Hydrochlorothiazide Combination in Comparison with Telmisartan/Amlodipine Combination for Essential Hypertension Patients not Controlled by Telmisartan/Amlodipine Combination

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of Arotinolol Hydrochloride and Metoprolol succinate on morning blood pressure, heart rate and target organ damage in patients with essential hypertension. To provide evidence for hypertension treatment. A group: Arotinolol Hydrochloride, oral, 5-15mg, bid for 12 weeks. B group: Metoprolol succinate sustained-release tablet, oral, 23.75-71.25mg, qd for 12 weeks.

The main objective will be to evaluate the dose-response of ACT-132577 (aprocitentan) on diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in participants with grade 1 or 2 essential hypertension. Secondary objectives will be to evaluate the dose-response of ACT-132577 on: systolic blood pressure (SBP); control and response rate of blood pressure; 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and to evaluate the safety and tolerability of a once daily oral regimen of 4 doses of ACT-132577.

A multi-center, randomized, double-blind, phase IV clinical trial to compare the efficacy and safety of OROSARTAN® tablet 5/160mg versus CODIOVAN® tablet 160/12.5mg in patients with essential hypertension uncontrolled with valsartan 160mg monotherapy

Refractory hypertension is defined as failure to reach goal blood pressure control in patients who are adherent to full doses of the appropriate drug regime. Hypertension results in 7.6 million deaths annually and 92 million disability adjusted years worldwide, making it the number one attributable risk for death throughout the world. Conventional treatment involves lifestyle modification and antihypertensive drug therapy; however blood pressure can remain uncontrolled despite these treatment options. Previous studies have demonstrated a reduction in blood pressure in adults with essential hypertension with the use of various homoeopathic complexes. There has been no research done to date on the effect of the homoeopathic combination of Amylenum nitrosum 6cH, Crataegus oxyacantha 6cH, Natrum muriaticum 6cH and Scutellaria lateriflora 6cH in adults with refractory hypertension. The aim of the study is to investigate the effect of a homoeopathic complex Amylenum nitrosum 6cH, Crataegus oxyacantha 6cH, Natrum muriaticum 6cH and Scutellaria lateriflora 6cH on blood pressure in adults with refractory hypertension, by means of blood pressure readings.

Children are increasingly being diagnosed with essential hypertension and the absence of comparative effectiveness research in antihypertensive therapies has contributed to considerable differences in prescribing practices among physicians treating children with essential hypertension. This study will consist of a series of systematically-administered n-of-1 trials among children to verify the need for ongoing antihypertensive treatment and if so, to identify the preferred single drug therapy.

Compare the safety and efficacy of amlodipine besylate and candesartan cilexetil combination therapy on patients of essential hypertension who are not properly controlled by candesartan cilexetil monotherapy.

Compare the safety and efficacy of amlodipine besylate and candesartan cilexetil combination therapy on patients of essential hypertension who are not properly controlled by amlodipine besylate monotherapy.