SPG Block for Acute Pediatric Migraine
Migraine in ChildrenSphenopalatine Neuralgia1 moreThis is a randomized double blind trial comparing an intranasal sphenopalatine block with 2% lidocaine to intravenous (0.15 mg/kg, max 10mg) prochlorperazine in patients greater than 10 years of age presenting to a pediatric emergency department with an acute frontal migraine headache.
Botulinum Toxin A in Patients With Myofascial Pain Syndrome With and Without Zinc Supplementation...
Myofacial Pain SyndromeBotulinum ToxinResearch question: Dose the use of oral zinc supplement improve the effects of botulinum toxins injection in patients with myofascial pain dysfunction syndrome? Statement of the problem: MPDS Patients treated with botulinum toxin A injection usually suffers from return of the symptoms which requires successive injections almost every (3-4M) Rationale for conducting the research: The concept of adding the zinc supplementation prior to BTXA injection is contributed to the fact that botulinum toxin is a zinc-dependent metalloprotease; therefore, every botulinum toxin molecule must be accompanied with a zinc molecule to effectively paralyze a muscle. However, commercially available BTXA preparations exclude zinc from their preparations, and BTX clinical efficiency and duration varies according to the zinc levels of the patient. Although the BTX effect could remain for several months, its zinc-dependent proteolytic activity befalls within hours of administration before the toxins are degraded in the tissues. Therefore, for achieving better results from BTX, the recipients should have adequate zinc levels at the time of administration. Therefore, oral zinc supplement intake prior to BTXA injection may enhance its clinical efficiency and duration. botulinum neurotoxins are the most potent toxins known. They bind to nerve cells, penetrate the cytosol and block neurotransmitter release. Comparison of their predicted amino acid sequences reveals a highly conserved segment that contains the HExxH zinc binding motif of metalloendo peptidases. The metal content of tetanus toxin was then measured and it was found that one atom of zinc is bound to the light chain of tetanus toxin. Zinc could be reversibly removed by incubation with heavy metal chelators. Zn2+ is coordinated by two histidines with no involvement in cysteines, suggesting that it plays a catalytic rather than a structural role. Bound Zn + was found to be essential for the tetanus toxin inhibition of neurotransmitter release in Aplysia neurons injected with the light chain. The intracellular activity of the toxin was blocked by phosphoramidon, a very specific inhibitor of zinc endopeptidases. Purified preparations of light chain showed a highly specific proteolytic activity against synaptobrevin, an integral membrane protein of small synaptic vesicles. The present findings indicate that tetanus toxin, and possibly also the botulinum neurotoxins, are metalloproteases and that they block neurotransmitter release via this protease activity. So The use of zinc supplementation prior to BTXA injection has been suggested by several previous studies to prolong its duration of action as well as improve its efficacy
Evaluation of 3D Michigan Appliance
Myofacial Pain Syndromes20 patients will be divided into 2 groups Group 1 : in which conventional appliance will be constructed after alginate impression Group 2 : in which 3d printed appliance will be constructed after intra-oral scanning
A Comparative Study of Two Dry Needling Interventions for Plantar Heel Pain
Plantar FascitisMyofacial Pain Syndromes2 moreThis is a clinical trial that will be done in the state of Kuwait, at the physical rehabilitation medicine hospital. the participants will be recruited from all over Kuwait, there is a clinical registry upon the ethical committee in Kuwait assigned by the ministry of health.
The Efficacy of Low-level Laser on Cervical Myofascial Pain Syndrome
Myofacial Pain SyndromesObjective: To compare the effectiveness of application of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) to trigger points and traditional acupoints for patients with cervical myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). Design: A single-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial Setting: University rehabilitation hospital Participants: One hundred and twenty one patients with cervical MPS Intervention: The investigators performed this experiment using low level 810-nm gallium aluminum arsenide (Ga-Al-As) laser. One hundred participants were randomly assigned to four treatment groups, including (1) acupoint therapy (2) acupoint control (3) trigger point therapy and (4) trigger point control groups. Main Outcome measures: The investigators evaluated the patient's visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, pressure pain threshold and cervical range of motion (ROM) before and after the therapy.
Studies of Dextromethorphan and Topiramate to Treat Oral and Facial Pain
Facial NeuralgiaPain1 moreThis study will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of two drugs-dextromethorphan and topiramate-in treating orofacial (mouth and face) pain. Dextromethorphan, a commonly used cough suppressant, and topiramate, an anti-seizure medicine, block certain receptors on brain and spinal nerve cells that may cause the cells to produce electrical discharges and pain. Patients 18 years of age and older with oral and facial pain with trigeminal nerve damage and who have had pain daily for at least 3 months may be eligible for this study. Candidates will be screened with a medical history, physical examination, blood tests and psychiatric evaluation. These results will serve as baseline values for participants. Those enrolled in the study will take either dextromethorphan or topiramate in a 2-part study as follows: Dextromethorphan In Part 1, patients will take dextromethorphan and lorazepam (a commonly used anti-anxiety drug) separately in two 6-week periods. (Lorazepam is used in this study as an "active placebo" for comparison with dextromethorphan. An active placebo is a drug that does not work for the problem being studied but whose side effects are like those of the test drug.) They will take dextromethorphan for 4 weeks to determine the maximum tolerated dose (the highest dose that does not cause troubling side effects) and will stay on that dose for the remaining 2 weeks. Then they will repeat this process with lorazepam. Patients who respond to either drug may continue with Part 2 of the study, which compares these two drugs four more times to confirm the response seen in Part 1. In Part 2, the maximum tolerated dose will be determined in a 2-week period and that dose will be continued for another 2 weeks. This procedure will be repeated eight times. Throughout the study, patients will keep a daily pain diary. They will be contacted by telephone 2 to 3 times a week during dose escalation to check for side effects. At the end of each of the two 6-week periods in Part 1 and at the end of each 4-week period in Part 2 of the study, patients will have a 1-hour clinic visit. Participants who live more than a few hours' drive from NIH will have a full telephone follow-up evaluation instead of the clinic visits. Topiramate Patients who receive topiramate will follow a plan similar to that described above for dextromethorphan, with the following exceptions. They will take topiramate and an inactive placebo (a look-alike pill that has no active ingredients) in two separate 12-week periods. Patients' maximum tolerated dose will be determined in the first 8 weeks and they will stay on that dose for the remaining 4 weeks of each period. Patients who respond to the medication in Part 1 may continue with Part 2 to confirm the response. Part 2 consists of six 6-week periods. The first 4 weeks of each will be used to determine the maximum tolerated dose and the patient will remain on that dose for the next 2 weeks. Patients will keep a daily pain diary and will be contacted by phone 2 to 3 times a week while doses are being increased. Patients who complete Part 2 of the topiramate study may participate in another phase of the study that will last for 2 years. Those who continue for this phase will take topiramate for the 2-year period. They will be followed regularly by a study nurse and will come to NIH every 6 months for a follow-up visit.
Treatment of Chronic Myofascial Pain Syndrome Over Neck by Using Intravascular Laser Irradiation...
Myofacial Pain SyndromesMyofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is characterized by single or multiple trigger points (TrP) in taut bands within the affected muscles. Chronic MPS over neck is prevalent and responsible for markedly loss of work-day and a reduction of quality of life. Intravascular laser irradiation of blood (ILIB) involves in vivo illumination of the blood by low-level laser light through an optical fiber inserted in a vein. Researches disclosed that ILIB reduced blood viscosity, enhanced erythrocyte deformity, and increased oxygen saturation in blood. However, no research studies the effectiveness of ILIB to treat MPS. Real-time sonoelastography (RTS) and shear wave velocity (SWV) are used to detect the stiffness of skeletal muscles. RTS is displayed as a color-coded graphic to represent the relative stiffness of structures. For a given material, faster SWV indicates the greater stiffness. To our knowledge, only one research using RTS and SWV to study MPS. To elucidate the effectiveness of ILIB to treat chronic MPS over neck, and the validity of RTS and SWV for MPS, we conducted this study.
The Effect of Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) in Myofacial Pain Syndrome
Myofacial Pain SyndromeTemporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are the major cause of non-dental pain in orofacial area. Laser therapy can be considered as one of the most recent treatment approaches in the field of physiotherapy. The special features of laser light such as coherence, monochromaticity, and collimation can result in the ability of laser light to modify cellular metabolism, increase tissue repair and reduce edema and inflammation. Several studies demonstrated successful results regarding the use of low level lasers in releasing pain of musculoskeletal conditions, but there are also contradictory reports in this field, and the clinical effectiveness of this treatment modality has been debated in some review articles. A few studies evaluated the efficacy of low level laser therapy in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders and the associated myofacial pain. There are remarkable variations in the methodology of these researches and some reported insufficient data regarding the physical properties of the laser used. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of low level laser therapy in improving the sign and symptoms of patients suffering from myofacial pain syndrome.
The Importance of Gluteus Maximus Muscle in Patients With Preliminary Diagnosis of Piriformis Syndrome...
Piriformis Muscle SyndromeMyofacial Pain Syndromes1 moreLiterature shows different pathologies or combination pathologies can cause gluteal region pain and it can be difficult to diagnose. Piriformis syndrome is one of the cause of gluteal region pain, symptoms of myofascial pain syndrome affected gluteus maximus muscle may masquerade as piriformis muscle syndrome or both syndrome can be seen together. The aim of this study is diagnosis myofascial pain syndrome of gluteus maximus muscle and piriformis syndrome by physical examination, special clinical tests and ultrasound guided diagnostic injection test in patients presenting with gluteal pain and evaluate the coexistence of both syndromes.
Effectiveness of Different Methods in Acute Myofascial Pain Syndrome
Myofacial Pain SyndromesThis study is a randomized controlled study. A total of 75 patients between the ages of 20-50 who have a diagnosis of acute myofacial pain syndrome in the trapezius muscle and have pain for a maximum of 5 days were included in the study. Patients were randomly divided into 3 groups. Group 1 patients received kinesio tape method (25 patients), group 2 patients received trigger point injection method (25 patients), and group 3 patients received neural therapy injection method (25 patients). A 10-15 cm sized I band was applied to the trapezius muscles of the first group patients with the patient's neck in lateral flexion. Then, while the patient's neck is flexed, a Y-shaped 15-20 cm tape will be affixed between C1-7 with the arms of the Y up, and I tape of 5-10 cm is attached on the arms. In group 2 patients, 1 cc lidocaine diluted with 4 cc saline (SF) was applied to the trigger points palpated manually in the trapezius muscles. After the trigger point was squeezed between the thumb and index finger, a few cc of local anesthetic mixture was applied into the trigger point with the injector and exited. In the 3rd group patients, a few cc local anesthetic mixture will be applied intradermally over the trigger point without entering into the trigger points palpated manually in the trapezius muscles. Patients were checked 72 hours and 1 week after the first applications. The pain at rest and during movement of the patients in all 3 groups were evaluated with a visual analog scale (VAS 10 cm). The number of trigger points was determined by the physician by hand palpation. Pressure pain threshold was evaluated with the algometer device. Disability assessment of the patients was made using the neck pain disability index. evaluations were made at the beginning of treatment, 72 hours after and 1 week after treatment.