Active clinical trials for "Atrial Fibrillation"

To compare the efficacy and safety of circumferential pulmonary vein isolation without contact force with the pulmonary vein antrum modification for patients of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

There are insufficient data on the safety and efficacy of edoxaban therapy in subjects with AF following catheter ablation. This phase 3b study is designed to evaluate the safety and to explore the efficacy of an edoxaban-based antithrombotic regimen versus a VKA-based antithrombotic regimen in subjects with AF following catheter ablation. Bleeding is a central safety outcome in cardiovascular clinical trials, especially for antithrombotic strategies and invasive procedures.

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety, acute and long term effectiveness, during standard RF ablation procedures while using Ablation Index and VISITAG™ software in combination with a Thermocool SmartTouch® (ST) or SmartTouch Surroundflow® (STSF) catheter. Furthermore, the role of Ablation Index and VISITAG™ workflow in creating contiguous ablation lines is assessed. The study is a prospective, non-randomized, post-market clinical evaluation. Up to 330 patients will be included in this study. All patients who qualify based on the study specific requirements will be invited to participate. The total duration of the study is estimated to be about 24 months (12 months enrollment period and 12 months of follow up). The clinical investigation population include subjects undergoing RF ablation for treatment of drug resistant symptomatic paroxysmal AF. Prior to enrollment in the clinical investigation, all subjects must meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria and are suitable candidates for enrollment in a clinical investigation in the opinion of the investigator. Subjects must have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) (Type I or III, including β-blocker) as evidenced by recurrent or are intolerant of the AAD.

Previous evidence indicated that the outcomes of both video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical ablation and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation therapy for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) were unsatisfied. Recently, hybrid ablation therapy for AF had encouraging outcomes. However, there were no randomized, controlled clinical studies to prove the effectiveness of this new strategy. This study is aimed to compare the outcomes of hybrid ablation with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical ablation for persistent AF with enlarged left atrium.

This study aims to explore the feasibility of a novel, patient-specific algorithm for adjusting warfarin doses during chronic anticoagulation therapy. Specifically investigators are interested in determining whether patients can use this algorithm to assume responsibility for managing their own warfarin therapy including making independent decisions about their warfarin dose and when to retest their next international normalized ratio (INR) test based on the result of their current INR result obtained using a point-of-care INR monitor.

This is a multi-site, randomized, investigator-initiated pilot study to evaluate the efficacy of investigational techniques to reduce fluoroscopy time or radiation dose and the amount of radio opaque contrast used during a cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation procedure for atrial fibrillation. One group of subjects will have the procedure performed with intracardiac echo maneuvers to assess cryoballoon occlusion of the pulmonary vein and will be compared to a group of subjects who will receive the standard medical treatment with fluoroscopy and angiography.

Aim. To compare changes in cardiac autonomic tone caused by radio-frequency versus cryoballoon ablation and to assess their value in predicting the outcome. Study group. In this prospective randomized study 126 consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing first ablation of AF using radio-frequency (RF) or cryoballoon (CB) technique will be recruited. Patients will undergo several ECG and autonomic tests before and after the procedure. The follow-up will last one year. Measurements: Standard 12-lead ECG a day before and 1-2 days after the procedure will be performed. The SR and P wave duration as well as the difference (∆) in SR and P wave duration before and after ablation will be analyzed. A 24-hour Holter ECG will be performed at baseline (1-2 days before ablation) and 7-day Holter ECG will be performed 3, 6 and 12 months after the procedure. Minimal, maximal and mean heart rate (HR) as well as HRV parameters will be analyzed. The differences (∆) in these variables between baseline and post-ablation Holter ECG recordings will be analyzed. Autonomic parameters (HR, HRV parameters and baroreceptor reflex sensitivity as well as hemodynamic parameters (stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), total peripheral resistance (TPR)) will be also examined before and after orthostatic stress. This will be performed using tilt table test and non-invasive measurement of autonomic and hemodynamic parameters before and shortly after (1-3 days) the procedure. Quality of life will be assessed using the AFSS scale and EHRA scale at baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months after ablation. Follow-up will last 12 months. Efficacy of ablation will be assessed during outpatients visits and using 7-day Holter ECG recordings 3, 6 and 12 months after the procedure. The analyzed outcomes will include symptomatic recurrences of AF, hospitalizations due to AF, redo procedures i occurrence of asymptomatic AF on Holter ECG monitoring. All the above listed parameters and ablation efficacy will be compared between the RF and CB groups. Anticipated results. Ablation significantly effects the parameters of cardiac autonomic control These effects are more pronounced in the CB group compared with the RF group Changes in autonomic indices have value in predicting ablation efficacy in both analyzed groups.

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has become a common and effective treatment for paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), particularly in patients with drug-refractory disease. Intense endurance exercise is a known risk factor for atrial fibrillation. In general, these athletes poorly tolerate most common antiarrhythmic drugs used for atrial fibrillation control and often PVI is recommended for durable management. While the efficacy of PVI in athletes is similar to the general AF population, some athletes with lone atrial fibrillation report a reduction in subjective exertional capacity following PVI, despite maintenance of sinus rhythm and absence of pulmonary vein stenosis on imaging. The investigators hypothesize that PVI may alter pulmonary vein function and affect peak exercise performance. The investigators propose a small, prospective study of endurance athletes undergoing antral PVI for treatment of lone atrial fibrillation. Peak metabolic performance and pulmonary vein function will be assessed pre- and post-PVI by metabolic stress testing and cardiac MRI, respectively.

The WAVECREST PMCF Study is a prospective, non-randomized, multicenter study to confirm safety and performance of the Coherex WaveCrest Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) Occlusion System in the current medical practice setting in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who are at increased risk for stroke. Up to 65 subjects may be enrolled at up to 15 study sites in Europe. Patients will be followed through 45 days post-procedure.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia affecting over 3 million Americans and about 33.5 million individuals globally. The lifetime risk of developing AF is 1 in 4 for adults over age 40 years. AF is associated with a major medical and socioeconomic burden including high cost, increased risk of stroke, heart failure, dementia, myocardial infarction, and death. Numerous studies have demonstrated that modifiable risk factors including hypertension, obesity, sleep apnea, diabetes, and sedentary lifestyle predict the development of AF. Recent studies have reported that secondary prevention interventions through aggressive risk factor modification can reduce the burden of AF. Structured, physician and nursing-led interdisciplinary AF programs have been shown to improve patient adherence to guideline recommendations and improve long term prognosis. Previous data, however, are derived mainly from white European and Australian cohorts and it is unclear whether such interventions can be effectively implemented in a racially diverse, safety net hospital in the U.S. This study is a randomized hybrid implementation-effectiveness study designed to investigate feasibility and effectiveness of an evidence-based innovative AF program, focusing on risk factor modification and AF education in a racially mixed population receiving care in a safety net hospital.