Effect of Complex Weight-reducing Interventions on Rhythm Control in Obese Subjects With Atrial...
Atrial FibrillationObesityObesity is a well-established risk factor for the development of atrial fibrillation (AF), while the reduction of body weight was shown to reduce the risk of AF. However, little is known about the effect of different weight-reducing interventions on AF burden. The study will evaluate the effect of a complex program aimed at weight reduction on AF burden in subjects after catheter ablation for AF and at least 1st degree obesity. This will be investigated in randomized study design and compared with patients receiving standard care without specific obesity-related intervention. The weight loss program will consist of diet, lifestyle and exercise counselling and, in selected subjects, also bariatric surgery in order to achieve a sustained weight loss of >10% of initial body weight. Secondary aims include identification of patient phenotypes with the most benefits from weight reduction as well as elucidation of potential pathomechanisms linking obesity and AF, with the main focus being on low-grade inflammation. The project will help to define the optimal weight-reducing regimen in AF and to tailor the interventions to individual patient needs.
ABLATE Versus PACE: PVI or AV Node Ablation and PM Implantation for Elderly Patients With Persistent...
Atrial FibrillationAs patients age, symptom control and treatment of atrial fibrillation become equally difficult, often leading to increased hospitalization. ABLATE versus PACE is a prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing pacemaker implantation with AV node ablation with pulmonary vein isolation in terms of rehospitalization and quality of life in patients with persistent AF aged 75 years and older.
The Efficacy and Safety of Non-vItamiN K antaGonist oraL Anticoagulants for intermEdiate Stroke...
Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Intermediate Stroke RiskThe purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) in atrial fibrillation patients with intermediate stroke risk (CHA2DS2-VASc score 1 for male, 2 for female). A. Major safety results include major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding. B. Major efficacy results include strokes, systemic embolism and mortality. C. Other results include myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, transient ischemic attack, hospitalization, drug compliance, quality of life questionnaire (AFEQT), cognitive function (KDSQ), aging questionnaire(K-Frail) and hand grip strength.
Ablation of Fibrotic Areas in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.
Atrial FibrillationBrief summary: The objective of this study is to compare two different ablation strategies in participants with persistent atrial fibrillation and fibrotic areas in the left atrium. The participant will be randomized to pulmonary vein isolation or pulmonary vein isolation plus ablation of fibrotic areas.
Left Atrial Posterior Wall Additional Isolation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Trial
Persistent Atrial FibrillationCatheter Ablation2 moreThe purpose for this study is to determine whether left posterior wall isolation (PWI) in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is effective as ablation strategy for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF).
Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Balloon Cryoablation in Elderly Patients With Atrial Fibrillation...
Atrial FibrillationThis study compares the procedural characteristics and effectivity of radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation in patients with atrial fibrillation that are 75 years or older.
Cryoballoon Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Atrial Fibrillation With Heart Failure
Atrial FibrillationHeart Failure1 moreThe combination of atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) is common and implies a poor prognosis. Pulmonary vein isolation is an established method for the treatment of symptomatic AF in patients with normal heart function and has been shown to be more effective than drug therapy. Recently, radiofrequency ablation has shown a positive effect in patients with AF and HF. POLAR-HF has been designed to investigate efficacy and safety of cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF and severe HF (LVEF ≤ 40%).
Personalized Atrial Fibrillation Ablation With QDOT
Atrial FibrillationCircumferential pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has become a mainstay in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF), particularly in symptomatic patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF) intolerant or refractory to medical treatment. The safety and short-term performance of the novel QDOT® catheter (Biosense Webster, Irvine, CA, USA), that allows for a high-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation, has already been evaluated in the QDOT-FAST clinical study, with favorable data on feasibility and safety, and lowered fluoroscopy and procedure times needed to achieve complete PVI. HPSD ablation was based on immediate heat formation during the resistive phase, affecting a small tissue depth at 90 W/4 s (irrigation at 8 ml/min) with a temperature limit of 65ºC. However, up to date there are no randomized studies evaluating the real usefulness of the QDOT® catheter. Longer-term follow-up is still required to verify the long-term effectiveness and correlations between short-term follow-up and arrhythmia recurrence when using this catheter. The impact of this novel catheter, when used in conjunction with a personalized ablation protocol that uses the information of left atrial wall thickness (LAWT) to modulate the AI target at each ablation point, compared with a standard ablation protocol following the published CLOSE study criteria is already unknown.
Stroke Prophylaxis With Apixaban in Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 5 Patients With Atrial Fibrillation...
Chronic Kidney DiseasesAtrial Fibrillation8 moreObjective: To study the efficacy and safety of apixaban as stroke prophylaxis in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 5 and atrial fibrillation (AF) with or without dialysis treatment. The study hypothesis is that compared to no anticoagulation, apixaban reduces the incidence of ischemic stroke without causing an unacceptable increase in fatal or intracranial bleeding events. The secondary objectives are to evaluate the risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, and major bleeding in people with CKD stage 5 and AF treated with apixaban compared to standard of care without anticoagulation. Trial design: Pragmatic Prospective Open Label Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial, phase 3b over 12-72 months. Trial population: 1000-1400 patients at ≈50 sites in Sweden, Finland, Norway, Iceland and Poland Eligibility criteria: Adults ≥18 years with CKD stage 5 (ongoing treatment with any chronic dialysis treatment OR an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)* <20 ml/min/1.73 m2 at least twice 3 months apart of which at least one occasion is <15 ml/min/1.73 m2 due to CKD during the last 12 months) and a diagnosis of chronic, paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent AF or atrial flutter (AFL) with CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2 for men or ≥3 or more for women as an indication for oral anticoagulation. The exclusion criteria are AF or AFL due to reversible causes, rheumatic mitral stenosis or moderate-to-severe non-rheumatic mitral stenosis at the time of inclusion into the study, a condition other than AF or AFL that requires chronic anticoagulation, contraindications for anticoagulation, active bleeding or serious bleeding within 3 months, planned for surgery within 3 months, and current use of strong inhibitors of both CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein. Interventions: Randomization 1:1 to treatment with apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily and standard of care, or standard of care and no anticoagulation. Outcome measures: primary efficacy (time to first ischemic stroke); primary safety (the composite of time to first intracranial bleeding or fatal bleeding); secondary efficacy (time to all-cause mortality, time to cardiovascular event or cardiovascular death); secondary safety (time to first major bleeding according to International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) criteria)
Pulsed-field Ablation vs. Sham Ablation to Treat AF
Atrial FibrillationThe study is planned as a single-blind, multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Sixty sbjects will be randomized 1:1 to either: (i) EP study + PFA, or (ii) EP study + Sham ablation control. After informed consent is obtained, an implantable loop recorder (ILR) will be implanted within seven days, and an EP study will be scheduled for 30±5 days after ILR implantation. Patients in both groups will first undergo an EP study to rule out a concealed AV bypass tract and supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). Patients will not be randomized if SVT or concealed AV bypass tract is found during the EP study. Once an SVT or bypass tract is excluded, randomization will be performed. Patients randomized to Ablation will undergo PVI using the commercially-available pentaspline PFA catheter (Farawave, Farapulse-BSCI Inc). Patients randomized to the Sham-ablation Control group will simply undergo approximately 20-30 min of anesthesia with propofol and benzodiazepines in a similar manner as patients in the ablation arm. Primary endpoints will be assessed six months after the procedure. ECGs will be monitored using implantable ECG monitors (ILR) in all patients. There will be two co-primary endpoints (assessed at six months or at cross-over if Early Exit): Freedom from recurrent AF/AT/AFL (post 2-month blanking), assessed as time-to first recurrence; Quality of life according to Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy of life (AFEQT) score at 6 months (or at cross-over if Early Exit).