Active clinical trials for "Fecal Incontinence"

Fecal incontinence (FI), defined as the involuntary passage of stool for more than 3 months and is a devastating disease. The negative impact on quality of life has been consistently demonstrated. The prevalence of FI is probably underestimated in most studies. Currently conservative treatment is only modestly effective and surgical treatment is complex and expensive with less than optimal efficacy. The investigators developed an "anal tape" using a commercially available elastic band with a special adhesive that is approved for use in the skin. A special design of the tape can be applied to the skin surrounding the anus providing support and additional pressure forces to the anal sphincter. This is a 4 week, prospective, non blinded, cross-over study to explore the efficacy and safety of this device in patients with FI. The primary endpoint will be improvement in quality of life.

This is a healthy volunteer three-way crossover study. A total of 12 subjects will receive three single administrations of 1 g rectal suppositories (containing either 5 mg NRL001, 10 mg NRL001 or matching placebo), with a washout period of at least 7 days between dosings. A further 12 subjects will receive three single administrations of 2 g rectal suppositories (containing either 5 mg NRL001, 10 mg NRL001 or matching placebo), again with a 7 day washout period between dosings. The pharmacodynamic response, pharmacokinetics and safety profile will be determined.

The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness and safety of NASHA/Dx when used as an injectable bulking agent in the treatment of fecal incontinence. The study includes a 6-month blinded sham-controlled phase, followed by an open-label phase.

A short presentation of a randomized clinical trial of biofeedback and anal injections as a first treatment option of faecal incontinence. Background: Faecal incontinence affects mainly women who have suffered sphincter disruption from vaginal delivery, but individuals of all ages can be affected. The treatment of this debility is not uniform between institutions or internationally. Often is surgical reconstruction of the anal sphincter performed, or other invasive, costly treatment options. The study: We intend to conduct a randomized, controlled, clinical trial where we compare the effect of two less invasive, less costly treatment options as a first alternative: biofeedback and anal injections. Our hypothesis is that anal injections will give a better and more lasting effect than biofeedback. The primary endpoint will be change in faecal incontinence assessed by the St. Marks incontinence score. Secondary endpoints will include change in quality of life and several physiological parameters. We intend to include 62 patients in both groups, 124 all together, from 2 centres in Norway. The observation time is 2 years. We plan to include the first patient April 2006, and conclude the study by December 2010. This study can contribute to a more appropriate treatment-algorithm for these patients. Study group: Barthold Vonen MD PhD, Department of gastroenterological surgery, University Hospital of North Norway Rolv-Ole Lindsetmo MD PhD, Department of gastroenterological surgery, University Hospital of North Norway Arvid Stordahl MD PhD., Department of Surgery, Østfold Hospital Fredrikstad Ylva Sahlin MD PhD, Department of Surgery, Innlandet Hospital Hamar Trond Dehli, MD, Department of gastroenterological surgery, University Hospital of North Norway Kjersti Mevik, Stud. Med, University of Tromso Project manager: Trond Dehli Funding, approvals, publication: This study is funded from Northern Norway Regional Health Authority and The Institution of Norwegian Health- and rehabilitation-organizations. It has been approved by the Regional Committee for Medical Research Ethics and Norwegian Social Science Data Services. The results will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal after the Vancouver-convention's guidelines. The results will also be presented at national and international conferences. Contact: Trond Dehli, Department of gastroenterological surgery, University hospital North Norway, Breivika, 9038 Tromsø trond.dehli@unn.no tlf: +47 776 26 000

Fecal incontinence affects 2% of adults in the United States. Biofeedback has been recommended for the treatment of fecal incontinence because uncontrolled studies over the past 25 years suggest that these treatments are as effective as medical or surgical management and involve no risk. However, placebo-controlled trials are still lacking. The aims of this study are: (1) to compare biofeedback to alternative therapies for which patients have a similar expectation of benefit; (2) to identify which patients are most likely to benefit; and (3) to assess the impact of treatment on quality of life.

This study will investigate if citalopram, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, is reducing the opening pressure of the urethra and possibly causing or worsening stress urinary incontinence. Reboxetine, a norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, is known to increase urethral opening pressure through actions on adrenoceptors in Onuf´s nucleus and will act as an active control. Furthermore, this study is performed to explore the effects of reboxetine and citalopram on the opening pressure of the anal canal.

This is a RCT aimed to assessing efficacy of kegel exercises,biofeedback, electrostimulation and transcutaneous neuromodulation on women with fecal incontinence, measuring its impact on anorectal physiology, cortical plasticity, clmical severity and the quality of life.

Fecal incontinence is one of the most psychological frustrating problems. It occurs in children due to many causes. There is a wide range of non-invasive therapeutic approaches like Kegel exercise, Biofeedback, and posterior tibial nerve stimulation. However, up till now, there are no established guidelines for treatment. the objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the early effect of Biofeedback therapy versus bilateral transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (TPNS) as non-invasive methods in the treatment of functional non-retentive fecal incontinence (FNRFI) in children.

Fecal incontinence (FI) is the inability to control bowel movements, causing stool to leak from rectum it ranges from an occasional leakage of stool while passing gas to a complete loss of bowel control after the age of 4 years1. Functional non-retentive fecal incontinence (FNRFI) is fecal incontinence in a child with a mental age of more than 4 years with no evidence of metabolic, inflammatory, or anatomical cause2. The long-term result of biofeedback therapy is one of the most important subjects of controversy, and few studies have extended to 2 years of follow-up 11. So, the purpose of this study was to evaluate quantitatively the short-term and long-term efficacy of biofeedback training as a treatment tool designed to control functional non-retentive fecal incontinence in children and its long term impact on the quality of life.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare treatment with fiber and loperamide for fecal incontinence.