Active clinical trials for "Fecal Incontinence"

Fecal incontinence is a frequent pathology which concerns 10% of the general population and severely alters patients quality of life. The cost of urinary and faecal incontinence has been estimated to be $16 billions a year. Several treatments exist depending on the aetiology of the faecal incontinence: medical treatments, biofeedback and sacral nerve stimulation. Nevertheless, these treatments are not always effective (50-70% of success) and are not without side effects, particularly the sacral nerve stimulation (pain, infection, electrode displacement..). The intravesical injections of botulinum toxin have been used for several years for the treatment of urinary incontinence with overactive bladder. Several randomized trials have demonstrated the efficacy of these injections in patients with neurological disorders and overactive bladder, as well as in idiopathic overactive bladder. The toxin injections in the detrusor muscle increase the compliance and the bladder capacity and delay the initial appearance of detrusor uninhibited contraction. Furthermore, botulinum toxin decreases the urinary urgency. It maybe secondary to the reduction of the amplitude of the detrusor uninhibited contraction as well as to a direct effect of toxin on sensory pelvic nerve afferents. The botulinum toxin should play a role on motor afferents as well as on the sensory function of efferent nerves. The hypothesis is to demonstrate a decrease of active faecal incontinence and/or urgency episodes with improvement in quality of life, without any major side effects, in the patients included in this study. Nevertheless, the benefit of toxin injections are known to be temporary because of nerve re-growth. If we obtain similar results for fecal incontinence, it would be possible to schedule one to two injections a year because of the limited side-effects and invasiveness of the rectal injections.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether tibial nerve stimulation is an effective treatment for faecal incontinence.

The ForConti Contix Fecal Incontinence Management System (FIMS) is indicated for the management of accidental bowel leakage due to bowel incontinence. The ForConti Contix FIMS is designed to seal and help prevent the involuntary leakage of stool, liquids and gases from the rectum. ForConti Contix FIMS is for an individual with fecal incontinence that has impaired quality of life, is responsive and mentally capable to participate in their own treatment. This study is designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the ForConti Contix FIMS for its intended use utilizing a baseline period of 2 weeks followed by an on-device period of using the device for 4 weeks and completed with a followup period of 2 weeks.

CSAR Trial's aim is to determine whether the transverse coloplasty pouch or the side-to-end anastomosis as rectal reservoir reconstruction offers the best functional results.

Background: Fecal incontinence (FI) affects 2-13% of an adult general population. The prevalence increases with age, and after 50 years of age prevalence rates up to 26% in women have been reported. Quality of life in patients with FI is decreased considerably, in a similar extent as in patients with ulcerative colitis in relapse. Management of FI usually involves a stepwise approach; beginning with more conservative strategies and moving on to more appropriately tailored medications, bowel-retraining, biofeedback and psychosocial support. Although a combination of these treatment alternatives often improves symptoms they are not always successfully. Neuromodulation is a relatively new treatment modality for FI that is based on recruitment of residual anorectal neuromuscular function pertinent to continence by electrical stimulation of the peripheral nerve supply. Sacral Nerve Stimulation (SNS) is one type of neuromodulation and it employs direct electrical stimulation of the sacral nerves. Recently an alternative neuromodulation technique to SNS has been developed in treating FI i.e. tibial nerve stimulation. The tibial nerve contains afferent and efferent fibers originating from the forth and the fifth lumbar nerves and the first, second and third sacral nerves. Thus, stimulation of the tibial nerve may lead to changes in anorectal neuromuscular function similar to those observed with SNS but without the need of a permanent surgically implanted device. Tibial nerve stimulation is therefore an attractive treatment alternative for FI patients since the treatment is well-tolerated and treatment results have been very promising. Aim: The overall aim is to measure the effect of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) in combination with biofeedback on symptoms in consecutive FI patients compared with biofeedback alone. The investigators also aim to study which FI patients have most profit of the addition of PTNS. Methods: The study will take place at the Pelvic Floor Unit, department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Linköping. Prior to the first visit to the hospital a symptom diary will be mailed to the FI patients and they are instructed to record their FI symptoms, bowel habits and gastrointestinal symptoms prospectively on a 24-hour diary during 2 weeks. Before consideration of enrolment into the study, gastroenterologists assess all the patients' medical history and perform a physical examination. Subjects will also have an endoanal ultrasonography and the investigators will measure rectal volumes, sensational thresholds and anal sphincter function. FI patients who fulfil inclusion criteria will then be randomly assigned to either PTNS in combination with biofeedback or biofeedback alone. The treatment will be performed by physiotherapists.

Fecal incontinence is the complaint of involuntary loss of feces. Fecal incontinence affects 2-12% of the adult population. It is a hidden problem - less than one third of the affected persons discuss the problem with their doctor. The condition has a negative effect on quality of life. It is associated with shame and limitation in social life, leisure, occupational and sexual activities. Pelvic floor muscle exercises with or without the use of biofeedback has been recommended and used for the treatment of fecal incontinence over the last decades. Several uncontrolled trials and some controlled trials have shown a positive effect of this training, but most of the trials are small and/or have methodological problems. Therefore there is to day still a lack of sufficient evidence for the effect of pelvic floor muscle exercise as a treatment of fecal incontinence. The aim of this study is to compare the effect of an individual physiotherapeutic supervised pelvic floor muscle training program with a control physiotherapeutic treatment (massage of the neck and back). Both treatments will be given parallel with standard information and guidance given by a nurse specialized in anal incontinence issues. Study hypothesis: Pelvic floor muscle exercises given parallel with standard advice and guidance by a specialized nurse, provides better effect to reducing fecal incontinence than control treatment and standard advice alone.

This is a prospective clinical study on the efficacy of Gore-BioA fistula plug in high transsphincteric fistulas. Follow-up time is six months

The anorectal manometry is the gold standard in the evaluation of anorectal function. Several techniques are currently used (balloons, perfused catheters) and are always performed in the supine position. Few studies have reported the evaluation of sphincter function in the upright position, whereas symptoms of fecal incontinence occur in this position. Recently developed, high-resolution manometry, thanks to its many mechanical sensors, allows topographic analysis and evaluation of anorectal function more acurate. In addition, the rigid nature of the probe should allow stability measures / recording, which is not possible with probes perfused catheters example. We therefore propose to compare anal sphincter pressure in supine and standing, measured in high-resolution manometry.

Anal incontinence is frequent and treatment is difficult. One of the most important reasons is traumatic delivery. 10 % of women develop anal incontinence after first delivery. This incidence is higher after second vaginal delivery, particularly if the first delivery caused break in the anal sphincter. One possibility to avoid anal incontinence is the caesarean section. So, do the investigators have to recommend caesarean section for second delivery if the first was traumatic? But caesarean section had a morbidity. Actually, the choice between the delivery modalities is very subjective.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether biofeedback exercises improve anal continence after anterior resection for rectal cancer.