Active clinical trials for "Feeding and Eating Disorders"

This study aims to develop and evaluate the efficacy of a behavioral weight loss treatment approach for individuals with binge eating disorder to both reduce their binge eating behaviors and lose weight.

Eating disorders (ED) are insufficiently detected and belatedly or not treated during pregnancy. There are many screening questionnaires for eating disorders in the literature, but we note the absence of a specific and validated tool for their screening during pregnancy, which would make it possible to differentiate maternal dietary concerns related to pregnancy from symptoms linked to a proven eating disorder. The main objective of the study is to evaluate which items of the Sick Control One stone Fat Food (SCOFF-F) and Eating disorders examination questionnaire (EDE-Q) questionnaires could be specific to an ED during pregnancy and not related to the simple state of pregnancy, by comparing the answers of pregnant women, for whom the diagnosis of ED has been made, to those of pregnant women without an ED.

The purpose of this study is to test if imaginal exposure therapy can decrease symptoms of eating disorders and anxiety.

This trial aims at comparing three group treatments designed for eating disorders: a Cognitive-dissonance, a Mindfulness and a Person-centered based programs. Women with eating disorders will be recruited and randomized to one of the three programs. Participants will complete a pretest, a posttest, a 3-months follow-up and a 1-year follow-up. This trial aims to compare the programs to analyze the specific dimensions upon which each program acts. The investigators therefore made hypotheses according to the programs' theory: participants in the Cognitive-dissonance based program should experience a greater decrease in eating disorders symptoms, thin-ideal internalization and body dissatisfaction and a greater improvement in quality of life than other participants. Participants in the Mindfulness-based program should show a greater improvement in negative affect and in equanimity than other participants. Participants in the Person-Centered based program should report a greater increase in congruence than other participants.

Amongst psychiatric illnesses, eating disorders (EDs) are notoriously difficult to treat and have a high mortality rate. The average duration of an ED is 6 years and for a majority of ED patients, the disorder will become chronic. Comorbid personality pathology such as negative core beliefs and early maladaptive schemas (EMS) are strongly related to ED severity and chronicity. Enhanced cognitive-behavioural therapy for eating disorders (CBT-E) is used as the first line transdiagnostic treatment for EDs. However, CBT-E is mainly symptom-focused and does not tap into these underlying core beliefs and EMS. Given the limited treatment effects of existing ED treatments, and the importance of comorbid personality pathology, there is an urgent need to examine more effective treatments for EDs. Group-schematherapy (GST) overcomes the limitations of CBT-E and preliminary results for treatment-resistant EDs are promising. However, robust evidence regarding the clinical and cost-effectiveness of GST for patients that do not benefit from CBT-E is not yet available. The central aim of this project is to investigate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of GST for EDs in patients with comorbid personality pathology, who do not show a clinically significant response in the first phase of CBT-E. This is relevant and important as studies examining the effectiveness of GST for EDs are scarce. This project is a joint research initiative of three academic centers (Dutch Universities), four large nation-wide mental health organizations, and two foundations for client empowerment and participation. Eligible patients will be randomized to either GST or continuation of their CBT-E treatment after failing to show a significant treatment response in the first phase of CBT-E. Based on encouraging findings from previous studies and our own pilot data, a statistically and clinically significant better outcome in terms of ED symptoms, negative core beliefs, EMS, schema modes, and quality of life is expected in the GST group compared to the CBT-E group. GST is also expected to be more cost-effective compared to CBT-E as GST may in the long run prevent chronicity in terms of long treatment trajectories and delayed recovery. Finally, with the proviso of good results for GST, we will disseminate and implement GST in the standard of care for EDs. This project thereby has great potential to improve clinical and cost-effectiveness of treatment for chronic EDs.

The research team would like to test how efficacious an artificial intelligence chatbot is in delivering supportive behavioral interventions in populations with anxiety, depression, or eating concerns.

This present study will compare the efficacy of in-person versus virtually-delivered Body Project groups. It will also evaluate whether this body acceptance class produces greater reductions in eating disorder risk factor symptoms (pursuit of the thin ideal, body dissatisfaction, dieting, dietary restraint, negative affect, eating disorder symptoms, and the future onset of eating disorders over a 3-month follow-up in this population. It will also evaluate the effectiveness of this body acceptance class's ability to impact social appearance anxiety, body compassion, and self-stigma surrounding attaining help.

Current treatments for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with eating disorders (EDs) do not effectively address a central ED symptom - anxiety about weight gain - which contributes to poor outcomes. The proposed study evaluates the feasibility, acceptability, efficacy, and underlying mechanisms of an enhanced version of "open weighing," a cognitive-behavioral intervention designed to target anxiety about weight gain in AYAs with EDs. Understanding how to better treat AYAs with EDs, and identifying the mechanisms by which interventions lead to improvement, will aid in the development of more effective and personalized treatments, ultimately improving the lives of AYAs with EDs.

Current literature has demonstrated that transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) has some efficacy in treating binge eating disorder. The investigators believe that TMS may be beneficial in the treatment of binge eating disorder. The purpose of this study is to determine whether TMS has efficacy for binge eating disorder and if symptom provocation affects treatment. This study will be conducted as a pilot study in the Keck Hospital clinics. 32 adult patients with a clinical diagnosis of binge eating disorder will be recruited, The primary aim of this study is to elucidate the impact of disorder provocation on the efficacy of TMS for the treatment of BED. In order to meet this objective, the investigators propose to evaluate this relationship in using a crossover study. Secondary objectives of this study include determining whether TMS with or without BED symptom provocation has effects in altering neurophysiology as detected by fMRI.

This research; The Turkish validity and reliability study of the "Reward-Based Eating Impulse Scale-13" developed by Ashley E. Mason was conducted to provide a new measurement tool for our country. At the same time, the study will provide a database for intervention studies to eliminate the effects of reward-based eating urge. Identifying reward-based eating in the middle and lower ranges of the eating disorder spectrum may contribute to halting the growing obesity epidemic. The Reward-Based Eating Impulse Scale will help researchers and clinicians to identify individuals who lack control over eating, cannot feel full, and are constantly preoccupied with eating.