Active clinical trials for "Lymphoma, Follicular"

This is an open-label study of safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of Auriхim multiple doses in patients with recurrent/ refractory В-cell, CD20-positive non-Hodgkin lymphoma of low tumor grade or with follicular lymphoma, as well as in patients non-treated before for В-cell, CD20-positive non-Hodgkin lymphoma of low tumor grade. The study will be carried out in 4-6 Russian and Belarussian sites. The study will be consisted of screening period, induction (obligatory) phase and supporting (non-obligatory) phase of the investigational therapy and post-treatment follow-up period.

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common subtype of indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and is often diagnosed in advanced incurable stage. In our previous trail, Lymvac-1, patients were treated with sequential intratumoral injections of low-dose rituximab and autologous dendritic cells, combined with local radiotherapy at the same site. The aim was to overcome tumor tolerance. In this trial, clinical responses correlated strongly with systemic anti-tumor CD8+ T-cell responses detected in blood after therapy. The primary aim of the planned study (Lymvac-2) is to significantly improve rates of immunological and clinical responses by adding iv anti-PD-1 antibody (Pembrolizumab) relative to the cohort of patients previously treated with intranodal immunotherapy without Pembrolizumab (Lymvac-1). The study includes 10 patients with untreated or relapsed FL.

This study will evaluate the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of induction treatment consisting of atezolizumab in combination with obinutuzumab plus lenalidomide in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (FL), followed by maintenance treatment with atezolizumab plus obinutzumab plus lenalidomide in patients who achieve a complete response (CR), a partial response (PR), or stable disease at end of induction.

This study will evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of long-term maintenance therapy with rituximab in participants with advanced follicular lymphoma who have had a positive response to first-line treatment with a rituximab-containing regimen. The anticipated time on study treatment is 2 years, and the target sample size is 124 individuals.

This study will evaluate the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of induction treatment with obinutuzumab, polatuzumab vedotin, and venetoclax in participants with relapsed or refractory FL, and with rituximab, polatuzumab vedotin, and venetoclax in participants with DLBCL. Participants with FL who achieve complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) at the end of induction therapy will receive post-induction treatment with obinutuzumab and venetoclax, and participants with DLBCL who achieve CR or PR at the end of induction (EOI) will receive post-induction treatment with rituximab and venetoclax.

This study will evaluate the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of induction treatment with obinutuzumab, polatuzumab vedotin, and lenalidomide in participants with relapsed or refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) and rituximab in combination with polatuzumab vedotin and lenalidomide in participants with R/R diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), followed by post-induction treatment with obinutuzumab in combination with lenalidomide in participants with FL who achieve a complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) at end of induction (EOI) and post-induction treatment with rituximab plus lenalidomide in participants with DLBCL who achieve a CR or PR at EOI.

This study will compare the safety and effectiveness of PF-05280586 versus rituximab-EU in patients with CD20-positive, low tumor burden follicular lymphoma. The primary hypothesis to be tested in this study is that the effectiveness of PF-05280586, as measured by the Overall Response Rate, is similar to that of rituximab-EU.

This study is a Phase 3 prospective, randomised, parallel-group, active controlled, double blind, multicentre, international study with 2 coprimary endpoints designed to demonstrate equivalence in pharmacokinetics (Part 1), as well as noninferiority in efficacy (Part 2), of CT-P10 to Rituxan when coadministered with CVP and to assess efficacy and safety in patients with advanced (stage III-IV) FL. Part 1 and Part 2 of the study will run in parallel.

This study will evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and anti-tumor efficacy of ocrelizumab in participants with progressive follicular NHL.

In the treatment of patient with lymphoma the most common high-dose chemotherapy regimen used prior to autologous transplantation (ASCT) is the BEAM regimen. It consists of four chemotherapy drugs together (BCNU, etoposide, cyclophosphamide, melphalan), whose initial letters are grouped together for BEAM regimen. One of the most common organ damage this intensive treatment is caused by the drug BCNU; it involves a lung injury, which manifests itself in the months after ASCT with increasing shortness of breath and cough, and can result in pulmonary fibrosis. The drug bendamustine is used successfully in different lymphoma types, and its efficacy in lymphoma therapy is well documented. Moreover bendamustine doesn't cause lung injury. Initially experience with bendamustine instead of BCNU - in the so-called BeEAM scheme - shows that this scheme is quite effective and well tolerated, without lung injury. In BeEAM scheme therefore bendamustine replace the BCNU, while the other three drugs are administered in the same dosage and order. The aim of the present study conducted at four centers (Bern and Zurich in Switzerland, Vienna and Linz in Austria) is to compare these two high-dose chemotherapy schemas and to show that the BeEAM scheme causes significantly less lung injury than the BEAM regimen.