Active clinical trials for "Diabetic Foot"

Objective: investigate The effect of combined red and infrared lasers on histopathology collagen formation in diabetic foot ulcer Participants: The forty five patients will assigned randomly into three equal groups, each group consist of 15 patients, group A received laser therapy in sequential mode, group B received laser therapy in separate mode and the control group C receive conventional wound care treatment

This pilot study examined the effects of ELO water, a commercially-available oxygen-enriched drinking water, on wound healing in patients with diabetic foot ulcers over 12 weeks.

Diabetic foot ulcers are one of the complications of diabetes mellitus. These wounds are often the result of diabetes-related neuropathy and/or an ischemic foot. Even with great care, recurrent ulcers are common. To mediate the damage and societal costs that come with DF there is a need for applications to detect ulcers before they come apparent. Two of these promising techniques are Laser Speckle Contrast imaging and thermography. This study is part of 4 specific clinical studies and is aimed at determining Laser Speckle Contrast imaging and thermography features, the provocations that are needed to optimize imaging and the correlation between these features and the IWGDF risk stratification category system for the diabetic foot.

Background: People with diabetes and either current or previous diabetic foot ulcer disease (DFUD) are at very high risk for adverse cardiovascular events including heart attacks and strokes. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are a class of medications that have shown to be very effective in reducing heart disease and event risk. However, one recent study found that SGLT2i's may increase minor amputation risk in those with DFUD, though this finding has not been replicated in other similar studies. However, as a result, there has been limited further investigation into this issue and as such the use of SGLT2i's in those with DFUD remains a contentious issue, despite their potential for significantly reducing cardiovascular disease risk in this population. In the absence of further randomised controlled trials investigating the use of SGLT2is in these populations, there is a need for clinical guidelines advising on their use based on expert clinical consensus, including specific criteria or scenarios in which they should or should not be used. The Delphi methodology is an iterative survey technique that uses expert opinion from various relevant backgrounds and experiences to generate a consensus based upon various statements and/or scenarios. Aim: The aim of this study is to use the Delphi technique to generate expert consensus-based clinical guidelines on the use of SGLT2i's in those with diabetes and DFUD. Methods: This is a Delphi technique-based study using a purposive sample of convenience. Consensus development methods will be used to generate clinical guidelines, endorsed by key clinical groups, on the use of SGLT2i's in patients with diabetic foot ulcer disease, including acknowledgement of specific scenarios or patient characteristics that may influence these guidelines. The consensus group will consist of n=20 healthcare practitioners, including GPs, secondary care diabetologists, foot care specialists, cardiologists and pharmacists in order to ensure a breadth of expertise and input. Two rounds of the Delphi consensus process will take place, in order to iteratively develop the consensus-based clinical guidelines. This process is expected to take 4-6 months. The analysis will be on-going throughout the study and completed within 3 months of the last questionnaire round of the Delphi process.

The objective of this single-arm feasibility study is to investigate the safety and impact of the topical EPC Silver Wound Gel (EPC-123) in the management of diabetic foot ulcer wounds not progressing under the current standard of care.

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) are challenging to treat with complicated healing processes and require advanced wound care. Piscean collagen has the potential to promote the regenerative process while remaining cost-effective and with minimal side effects. In this study, the efficacy of a piscean collagen matrix dressing was compared with a standard dressing of saline-moistened gauze for wound healing in patients with neuropathic DFU. This is a double-blinded, randomised clinical trial.

Remedor has developed a patented technology (RMD-G1), which comprises erythropoietin (EPO) as the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) in a carbopol-based hydrogel with an FN matrix. RMD-G1 was designed to maintain EPO stability and activity over long periods and to optimize the administration of EPO onto the wound bed. RMD-G1 is indicated for treating DFUs in adult patients with diabetes mellitus and aims to accelerate the healing of diabetic foot ulcers. RMD-G1 is an adjunct treatment, and not a substitute for good diabetic wound care, which includes initial debridement, wound cleansing, pressure relief, and infection control. In this trial, RMD-G1 is applied daily onto a clean wound at 0.25g per sq. cm. wound surface. After its application, the wound will be covered with a dressing in order to prevent leakage of the hydrogel and contamination of the wound area.

The primary objective of these case series is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the KLOX BioPhotonic System as adjunctive therapy to Standard Of Care (SOC) in patients with diabetic foot ulcers.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether pl-vegf165 (Neovasculgen) is effective in the treatment of ulcers related to diabetic foot syndrome

This is a phase 3, randomized, controlled, blinded, multicenter study conducted in 3 parallel cohorts of diabetic patients with at least 1 infected foot ulcer. Patients will be randomized to receive 1 of 3 study treatments; systemic antibiotic therapy and standard ulcer care with either (A) daily application of a gentamicin-sponge, (B) daily application of a placebo-sponge or (C) no-sponge, in the ratio 2:1:1. Patients will be treated for approximately 28 days and return to the clinic weekly for safety and efficacy assessments. After completing treatment, patients will return to the clinic for scheduled follow-up visits approximately 10, 30, 60 and 90 days after treatment is stopped.