Active clinical trials for "Fractures, Bone"

Limb fracture is a common pathology in children. It represents the first complaint in traumatology among children in developed countries. Failure to diagnose a fracture can have severe consequences in pediatric patients with growing bones, that can lead to delayed treatment, pain and poor functional recovery. X-ray is the first tool used by doctors to diagnose a fracture. However, the diagnosis of fracture in the emergency room can be challenging. Most images are interpreted and processed by emergency pediatricians before being reviewed by radiologists (most often the day after). Previous studies have reported the rate of misdiagnosis in fracture by emergency physicians from 5% to 15%. A tool to investigate in diagnosing limb fractures could be helpful for any emergency physicians exposed to this condition

The primary goal of this study is to compare functional outcomes (range of motion [flexion, extension, supination, pronation], return to work, of patients with distal radius fractures who receive intraoperative glucocorticoids to those that do not. Secondary goals include comparison of pain control (number of pain pills consumed, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores) between patients with distal radius fractures who receive intraoperative glucocorticoids to those that do not. The primary endpoint of this study will occur when 18 patients in each test-group complete the 6 month follow up visit for study.

A comparison of oral morphine equivalents between an opiate sparing cohort and an opiate based cohort following open reduction internal fixation of a distal radius fracture.

This project will test feasibility to deliver an online education and skill development program for family/caregivers of older adults recovering from a surgically repaired low-trauma hip fracture. We will also recruit health providers to review and provide feedback on the eCourse before we test its feasibility and acceptability with caregivers.

This project is structured in two distinct phases. The first phase deals with the recovery of the hip fracture in the acute phase up to ambulation, and the second is understood as the continuation of functional improvement of gait. In the first phase, the aim is to evaluate the effects of the use of the robotic device (SWalker) on the physical improvement of the patient. While in the second phase, the objective is to evaluate the effects of virtual reality technology combined with the use of the SWalker.Therefore, the following specific objectives are identified: Phase I: To analyze the effects of SWalker application in patients with acute hip fracture on clinical parameters of rehabilitation. Phase II: To study the effects of the application of the SWalker combined with immersive technology in people with impaired gait function after hip fracture.

Hip fractures (HF) are the most common and serious pathology affecting the hip and are associated with a high mortality risk in elderly patients. The prevalence of HF is increasing day by day and surgery is often required for its treatment. Perioperative anemia not only hinders the early recovery and rapid rehabilitation of elderly patients, but also adversely increases the need for blood transfusion, prolongs hospital length of stay (HLS) and even increases the risk of death. Although the blood transfusion threshold is restrictive, approximately one or two thirds of elderly patients with hip fracture surgery (HFS) require blood transfusion during hospitalization, and blood transfusion also has potential side effects.The most important factor in the development of anemia in HF is blood loss; however, there are other mechanisms (renal failure, inflammation, iatrogenic hemodilution) that lead to the selection of different therapeutic approaches.Oral or intravenous iron supplementation is a well-accepted alternative to counteract or prevent perioperative anemia, stimulate erythropoiesis and increase Hgb level in elderly patients. However, there are few studies addressing the relationship between iron therapy and clinical outcomes or mortality. Because ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) allows doses of 2 g in a single session (and can be administered by a short IV infusion of 15-20 minutes), and furthermore, FCM is excellently tolerated and safe for patients. This study was planned to investigate the relationship between FCM supplementation and blood transfusion volume, HLS, postoperative infection and mortality.

This project consists of a prospective case design. Study candidates will include all patients ages 18 and over who were evaluated at UCSD and found to have a critical-sized humerus, femur, or tibia segmental defect that would be fixed through surgery. Patients who consent to study participation will receive the TRUMATCH Graft Cage for their long bone segmental defect repair. Data on healing rates, complication rates, re-operation rates, time to return to normal activity, and pain levels will be collected for each participation. After 3 years of data collection, we will analyze this data to provide further insight on the utility of the TRUMATCH Graft Cage. Given the significant difficulty with repairing segmental long bone defects, it is imperative to evaluate novel systems to appropriately manage these injuries.

The artificial intelligence (AI) software BoneView (GLEAMER Company, Paris, France) has been designed, tested and validated to detect and locate recent or semi-recent fractures on standard radiographs. The objective will be to assess the AI performance for the detection of bone fractures in children aged less than 2 years old in suspected child abuse setting. These patients benefit from a whole body radiography with a double blind reading by a "generalist" radiologist and a radiologist with expertise in child abuse. This readings will be compared with the AI results. Hypothesis is that AI is effective for child fractures detection and could be of help especially for radiologists who are not experts in child abuse.

FULL TITLE OF THE PROJECT Should we use post-operative antibiotics following surgery for patients with mandible fractures? The MANTRA trial (MANdibular TRauma and Antibiotic use) SUMMARY OF RESEARCH (ABSTRACT) Research Question: Are post-operative antibiotics required following surgery for patients with mandible fractures? Background: Mandible fractures are the commonest facial fractures needing surgery and account for a significant percentage of the acute workload in Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (OMFS) units. The UK records over 6000 new cases per year. Patients having surgery for mandible fractures have a theoretical risk of developing surgical site infection, due to the proximity of the fracture lines to the oral cavity microbes and the presence of foreign body (titanium fixation miniplates). For this reason, clinicians often prescribe antibiotics after surgery, to reduce the risk of infection. Previous systematic reviews and a multicentre cohort study performed by this team, revealed significant clinical variation in post-operative antibiotic prescription amongst UK OMFS clinicians and the presence of clinical equipoise. Antibiotic overuse can lead to antibiotic resistance and other antibiotic-related side effects; judicious antibiotic use and stewardship is of paramount importance. Aim: To determine whether post-operative antibiotics are required at all, following surgery for mandible fractures, and, if so, what is the most clinically- and cost-effective regimen Objectives: Primary Objective To conduct a Randomized Controlled Trial (MANTRA) in order to establish the non-inferiority (or not) of not giving post-operative antibiotics versus 2 other post-operative antibiotic regimens. An internal pilot phase will optimise recruitment and retention. Secondary Objectives Measure the cost-effectiveness of the proposed antibiotic pathways Assess patient and clinician acceptability to change clinical practice Process evaluation to inform dissemination and implementation Methods: The investigators designed and propose the MANTRA RCT to compare 3 post-operative antibiotic approaches to prevent Surgical Site Infections (SSIs) following surgery for mandible fractures. The MANTRA trial is a large open label, multicentre study in NHS OMFS units. The 3 study arms represent the most common clinical pathways in the UK based on previous work; the control group is the approach prescribed by most UK OMFS clinicians. All patients will receive 1 dose of IV antibiotics (co-amoxiclav 1.2g, if no penicillin allergy, which is the most commonly used prophylactic antibiotic currently) on induction of anaesthesia, prior to their surgery. The participants will be randomised to the following (1:1:1): Group A: No further antibiotics Group B: 2 further postoperative IV doses of co-amoxiclav 1.2g Group C: 2 further postoperative IV doses (as above), followed by a 5-day course of oral co-amoxiclav 625mg every 8 hours if no penicillin allergy (Control). Trial processes will be optimised by an internal pilot phase ensuring we recruit, randomise, and retain participants with clear progression criteria. We will also conduct cost-effectiveness analyses and process evaluation for dissemination and implementation Timeline: Start of grant: 1st July 2023 Start of RCT / pilot: 1st January 2024 End of pilot: 30th June 2024 End of recruitment: 31st December 2026 End of follow-up: 30th June 2027 Completion: 31st December 2027 Impact and dissemination: Practice changing outputs that standardise the use of antibiotics in mandible fractures in the NHS and provide a framework for other surgical prophylaxis research A bespoke clinical dissemination plan via an engagement and training legacy Cost-effectiveness data to inform policy making A research legacy and change of culture in the specialty of OMFS

Rationale: Patients with acute traumatic injury to the shoulder or chest wall in de Emergency Department (ED) usually have intense pain. The patient normally is treated with oral analgesics as standard care and in shoulder injury with a sling. Pain of the shoulder or chest wall increases with movement of the affected arm and chest. Kinesiotaping is offered regularly as an additional pain treatment, but there is no hard evidence about its effectiveness. A randomized pilot study in OLVG (Bakker 2022) showed the pain decreasing more when using kinesiotaping comparing to no tape. However, a placebo-effect could not be ruled out and the pilot data need confirmation in a large cohort of patients to study the effectiveness of additional treatment with kinesiotaping in terms of pain, comfort and patient satisfaction.