Active clinical trials for "Fractures, Bone"

This pragmatic multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) includes adult participants with an acute humeral shaft fracture to compare surgical fixation of humeral shaft fracture to non-surgical treatment with early identification and treatment of delayed union by a patient-reported outcome after 52 weeks. The trial population of 287 participants The trial population is divided in two age-groups due to the changes in DASH score by age. The definition of delayed union differs in the young and elderly population to consider dissimilarity in bone healing rates and the timepoint for crossover is therefor different between the groups. Participants will be randomized 1:1 between non-surgical treatment and surgical treatment. The primary outcome is the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score at 52 weeks, and is assessor blinded. The secondary outcomes are DASH score earlier than 52 weeks, EQ-5D-5L, pain assessed by visual analogue score, Constant-Murley score including elbow range of motion and anchor-questions collected at all timepoints throughout the trial. All complications will be reported including; infection, nerve or vascular injury, surgical revisions (implant malpositioning, hardware failure, aseptic loosening and peri-implant fracture), major adverse cardiovascular events, other major adverse events and mortality. SHAFT will provide information on the effectiveness of two standard treatments for humeral shaft fractures, while taking the dilemmas within the population into account.

The ADAPT system is a software that calculate a virtual 3D reconstruction of the femoral head without additional radiation. It automatically detects the used implant and its position relative to the femoral head, helping the surgeon to achieve an optimal proximal screw positioning in the femoral head. The investigators want to verify if with the addition of the ADAPT system the investigators can improve screw placement and reduce surgery time and radiation exposure.

The objective of the present study is to assess whether specific cognitive intervention will influence rehabilitation outcomes of post-acute hip fracture patients.

Patients with a fragility fracture are twice as likely to have future fractures compared to their non-fractured peers. Furthermore, the 30% who suffer a fragility fracture do not regain the level of functioning in terms of activities of daily living after one year. A recent ecological study, in several European countries, estimates that if fracture patients were enrolled in fracture follow-up services, at least 19,000 fractures could be prevented each year. Clinical trials carried out in the research group have shown that the prescription of physical exercise in severe underlying pathologies is effective in improving physical function, quality of life and long-term results. Hypothesis: The implementation of a motivational intervention and physical exercise program, in a staggered manner, taking into account the basic exercise capacity, improves the functional status of the patient (basic activities of daily life), adherence to interventions and the level of physical activity, and therefore reduces the number of hospital admissions, refractures and other associated complications. Objective: To evaluate the effect of a rehabilitation intervention based on physical exercise and motivation, applied in a staggered manner and according to the functional capacity of patients with fragility fracture.

Background Pediatric diaphyseal forearm fractures are common and one of the most frequent reasons for orthopedic care. Fractures in need of surgery are often treated with metal Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nails (ESIN). Nail removal after 6-12 months is generally advocated. Surgical hardware removal has few complications; however, it is a substantial burden on the child, the family and healthcare economy. Bioabsorbable Intramedullary Nails (BIN) have been developed for the same indications as metal ESIN. The use of bioabsorbable implants would deem hardware removal unnecessary and relieve the child of further surgery and reduce healthcare costs. Methods The investigators aim to recruit all children in the catchment area of Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital (Copenhagen, Denmark) with acute unstable diaphyseal forearm fractures. Participants will be operated with BIN and followed consecutively for 2 years with interim analysis of data after 6 months. The investigators will report radiological healing using the Radiographic Union Score (RUS) 3 months after surgery together with any adverse events during follow-up. Discussion This study will provide important preliminary data and asses the feasibility of using the bioabsorbable Activa IM-Nail™ in pediatric diaphyseal forearm fractures. This study is a pilot study for initiating an RCT comparing BIN to metal ESIN hypothesizing that BIN is not an inferior treatment.

Ultrasound-guided nerve blocks are an important tool for treating pain due to orthopedic injury in the ED. They provide long lasting, opioid-sparing pain relief that is generally safe and well-tolerated by patients1. Elderly patients with hip fractures commonly present to the ED, and their injury can be painful. Commonly used opioid pain regimens can have deleterious side effects, especially in elderly patients, like somnolence, delirium, hypotension and respiratory depression. The fascia iliaca compartment (FIC) block has become a familiar technique to emergency physicians as a pain control treatment for hip fractures. The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block has recently been proposed as a novel method to treat pain due to hip, acetabular and pelvic fracture by targeting the terminal sensory articular nerve branches of the femoral nerve (FN), obturator nerve (ON), and accessory obturator nerve (AON). At this time there has been no study comparing the efficacy of the two nerve blocks, PENG and FIC. This aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of the PENG block (20mL of Bupivacaine 0.50%) to that of the FIC block (40mL of Bupivacaine 0.25%) for patients with hip fractures in the ED. Our hypothesis is that PENG will demonstrate analgesia that is non-inferior to FIC. Subjective pain scores on a scale of 0 to 10 will be assessed before and after the block. All subjects will receive 4mg of morphine after consent and prior to the block.

This is a multicenter, single-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of the AGN1 LOEP SV Kit for the treatment of painful vertebral compression fragility fractures (VCFs). The objective of this study is to demonstrate non-inferiority of the AGN1 LOEP SV Kit for the treatment of VCFs to standard of care vertebroplasty treatment using bipedicular injection of PMMA bone cement.

This study is a multicenter pragmatic, prospective, assessor-blinded, randomized independent clinical trial in which we compare locking plate fixation to standard tension band fixation in patients with patella fractures.

A randomized control trial, including two intervention arms with different methods for rehabilitation after hip fracture, conducted among persons with the need of rehabilitation in their own home.

The Duration of External Neck Stabilisation (DENS) study is a randomised controlled trial comparing early removal of a hard collar with treatment in a hard collar for 12 weeks in older or frail adults with odontoid (dens) fractures. The primary outcome measure is QoL assessed using the EQ-5D-5L at 12 weeks following injury. The aim of the study is to determine whether management without a collar improves outcome, compared to management with a collar. Cost efficiency will be assessed over the observed 6 months using standard NICE reference case methodology.