Active clinical trials for "Fractures, Closed"

aap001 is a randomized, controlled, subject and observer-blinded, multi-center study to show the safety of the LOQTEQ® antibacterial silver-coated system is non-inferior in comparison with the uncoated LOQTEQ® system

The purpose of this prospective study is to confirm safety and performance of the FastFrame External Fixation System and corresponding instrumentation.

This study is a multicenter prospective randomized control trial comparing hardware retention (HR) to removal of hardware (RH).

The purpose of this study is to investigate the post-operative pain control in pediatric patients with closed lateral condyle fractures who undergo open reduction and percutaneous pinning. Patients will be randomized into one of two groups. Group 1 will receive an infraclavicular nerve block to the affected extremity by a fellowship trained pediatric anesthesiologist prior to surgery. Group 2 will undergo the Orthopaedic Institute of Children's (OIC) standard preoperative protocol. Post-operative pain management will be the same for both groups per standard protocol. Pain level will be assessed post-operatively using the Wong-Baker FACES scale and parents will be asked to fill out a questionnaire regarding their satisfaction with the surgery and pain control. Parents will also fill out a medication log until the patient no longer requires pain medication. All patients in both groups will receive standard oxycodone solution prescriptions post-operatively as per typical protocol. The duration of participation in the study is approximately 1 week and requires 2 visits (time of recruitment at surgery and 1st post-op visit). This study is being conducted in hopes of developing comprehensive pain management protocols to reduce opioid consumption after surgical fixations of displaced lateral condyle fractures if the study can show that patients are more satisfied and require less opioid medication when receiving preoperative regional anesthesia.

Nearly 2 out of 10 women will sustain a distal forearm fracture throughout their lifespan.Recent longitudinal studies illustrate that as many as 1/3 of all persons who undergo closed reduction and casting for distal radius fractures (DRF) go on to develop type 1 complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). Graded motor imagery (i.e., motor imagery and mirror therapy), a movement representation technique, is strongly supported in the literature as a treatment of CRPS and has recently been suggested as a potential strategy to prevent its onset. Other complications include disability, wrist/forearm tightness and sensorimotor changes. The investigators propose that an early intervention protocol which includes graded motor imagery (GMI) will improve the pain, functional and upper limb sensorimotor outcomes of persons following closed reduction and casting of DRF relative to a standard of care intervention.

Psychological factors such as stress, distress, anxiety, depression, and poor coping strategies may be associated with ongoing pain following injuries such as fractures. To study this relationship, patients will undergo cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) which is designed to modify such thoughts with the goal of reducing ongoing pain and improving quality of life. The goal of this study is to determine if CBT, versus usual care, reduces the prevalence of moderate to severe persistent post-surgical pain (PPSP) over 12-months post-fracture in patients with an open or closed fracture of the appendicular skeleton, treated with internal fixation.

The investigators objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of hematoma block versus intravenous regional anesthesia (Bier block) during closed reduction of distal radius fractures.

It has been hypothesized that because music has the ability to motivate, promote relaxation, alleviate pain and anxiety levels, to distract, and facilitate positive emotional states; thus it will enable healing by reducing anxiety levels which are associated with expected pain, hence patients are more unperturbed. In addition, several studies in the past have also identified that music listening can reduce the need for analgesics before surgery and after surgery to alleviate pain, reduce the period of post-operative pain and aid in the recovery period. While most studies which had administered music listening in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU), had found significant findings compared to patients that did not listen to music; there are few others which found otherwise. Over decades, time and again, researchers have tried to understand how non-pharmacological interventions have been utilized in a spectrum of rehabilitation settings in populations to stimulate convalesces. This is because non-pharmacological interventions have been recognised as valuable, simple, safe, and inexpensive adjuvants to pharmacological approaches in pain management and therefore is valuable during post-operative rehabilitation especially. This research is necessary because it hopes to address the gap of knowledge concerning the effects of music in post-operative pain, anxiety objectively in a specific population, and during an explicit time frame in a public hospital setting in Malaysia and whether by listening to music, the patients will require lesser amount of opioids analgesics. The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of music on pain and anxiety during post-operative period in patients with closed shaft femur fracture at University of Malaya Medical Centre.

Recently, A novel surgical technique was illustrated by Elhassan BT et al. in 2016 utilizing the Hemi-hamate autograft for the reconstruction of scaphoid bone proximal pole non-union with avascular necrosis. The technique showed promising results but is still limited to case reports and anatomical studies In this study, we aim to: Evaluate the surgical technique steps and suggest any possible modifications to the original description of the technique. Assessment of clinical outcomes of this novel technique in terms of; bone union rate, time to union, and wrist function. Report any complications of the usage of the proximal hamate for the proximal pole of the scaphoid reconstruction.

Fractures of the humeral shaft (upper arm bone) account for approximately 1% of all adult fractures in the United Kingdom. Historically, these injuries have been treated using a cast and/or brace, with immediate surgical fixation reserved for severely- or multiply-injured patients. However, treatment with a brace is associated with several important problems, including poor alignment of the healed bones and shoulder/elbow stiffness. The brace is usually worn for up to 3 months, which interferes with patients' everyday activities and sleeping, and can predispose to skin problems. For 10-15% of patients treated with a brace, their fracture will not heal and will require surgery several months after the original injury, which is more difficult and carries a higher risk of complications. Recent studies suggest that undertaking immediate surgical fixation more often could improve healing and functional outcome for patients with humeral shaft fractures. The only published randomised controlled trial (RCT) to date showed no difference in clinical outcome between conservative and operative management; unfortunately, however, the operative technique used was unusual and would be considered highly suboptimal in most Western countries. This study will include adult patients (≥16 years), with capacity to consent and complete post-operative questionnaires in English, presenting to a single Orthopaedic trauma unit. Participants will be randomised to either non-operative treatment (with a brace) or operative treatment (i.e. surgical fixation). The investigators will assess whether there is a difference between the groups in terms of patient-reported outcome scores, fracture healing, complications, pain and return to work/sport over a one-year follow-up period. Participants will be enrolled into the study after obtaining informed consent. Following randomisation (to either non-operative treatment or surgical fixation), participants will then be reviewed at several defined timepoints, with a combination of clinical examination, X-rays and patient-reported outcome scores. The investigators hope that study results will enable surgeons to make better-informed decisions when managing patients with humeral shaft fractures.