Active clinical trials for "Esophageal and Gastric Varices"

The primary objective of the study is to demonstrate the superiority of an "early tips" strategy over standard treatment by glue obliteration (G0) in preventing bleeding recurrence or death at one year after a non GOV1 gastric variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients initially treated by GO.

Carvedilol versus endoscopic band ligation for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients with arterial hypertension

Carvedilol has been shown to be more potent in decreasing portal hypertension to propranolol. But the efficacy of carvedilol to delay the growth of esophageal varices in chronic hepatitis B patients was unclear.

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of 2-days versus 5-days octreotide infusion after endoscopic therapy in preventing early esophageal varices rebleed in patients with cirrhosis.

Aim: To test if MRI can detect meaningful changes in portal pressure in the liver to assess whether treatment with beta-blockers has worked. Liver Disease: Most people with liver disease do not have symptoms. Over time they develop 'cirrhosis' - severe liver scarring. In the United Kingdom deaths due to cirrhosis have doubled over the last decade, because of increasing rates of alcohol consumption and obesity, while heart, kidney, lung diseases, strokes and cancer fatalities have fallen. Portal pressure: Cirrhosis causes increased pressure within the liver and changes in the circulation leading to the development of varicose veins in the gullet and stomach called 'varices'. Varices bleed easily, leading to emergency situations that can be life threatening. However, if the increased pressure within the liver (portal pressure) is detected early, then treatment can prevent variceal bleeding. The only test we have to predict prognosis and treatment success in someone with cirrhosis is by measuring the portal pressure. Measuring portal pressure: Currently the only existing test to measure portal pressure is to pass a pressure sensor through a vein in the neck, down into the liver. This is called the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement. The HVPG measurement is disliked by patients because it is an invasive procedure. It is also expensive and not widely available. Hence, patients with cirrhosis need to have regular camera tests (endoscopies) to look for varices. How can you treat varices? Two options; With tablets to lower the pressure (beta-blockers) Endoscopy treatment (banding) Both have advantages and disadvantages; Beta-blockers only lower the portal pressure in about half of those that take them, with some evidence they may also have a protective effect against infections from the bowel by increasing the speed of bowel motion Treating the varices with endoscopy requires several endoscopies and can lead to life-threatening bleeding. Most patients are therefore given beta-blockers and monitored closely to see if they work. Why does it matter? Beta-blockers can cause side effects (e.g. fainting) that are unpleasant enough to make up to one third of patients stop taking them. Beta-blockers only reduce the portal pressure in half of patients. The remaining patients are exposed to potential side effects and possible harm in those with the most advanced liver disease. These patients may still have a life-threatening bleed as the varices have not been adequately treated. There is a desperate need to discover whether the portal pressure changes with treatment (such as with beta-blockers) without invasive tests across the NHS. Proposed study: Researchers in Nottingham have shown MRI can be used as an accurate marker of portal pressure with just one scan. To be useful to patients, doctors and researchers, this study will investigate whether MRI can detect meaningful changes in portal pressure after treatment with beta-blockers. This study has been designed with patient and public involvement (PPI) integrated throughout. A focus group shaped the study design and committed to collaborate in developing patient materials, recruitment, retention and dissemination. All patients who have HVPG will be given information about the study. Study Visit 1 One hour MRI scan Endoscopy to identify varices If varices are present the patient will be started on beta-blockers and invited to visit 2 If there are no varices, patients will return to regular follow up with the liver team Study Visit 2 (after one week) Assess side effects, blood pressure and pulse Increase dose of beta-blocker as appropriate Study Visit 3 (after 4-12 weeks) One hour MRI scan Repeat HVPG measurement Treatment success is determined by the second HVPG measurement. If beta-blockers are working they will be continued. If not, the patient will have treatment with endoscopy. This represents the ideal pathway which is more personalised than current standard care.

Gastrointestinal bleeding is a common complication of liver cirrhosis which caused by esophageal and gastric varices. The risk of bleeding from gastric varices is relatively low. However, the bleeding is usually significant and severe. Current guidelines recommend endoscopic glue injection as the first line of treatment for gastric variceal bleeding. Although this technique has been shown to be effective, it is associated with many severe adverse events including systemic embolization, fever, chest pain, and even death. The rate of hemostasis has been reported to be as high as 91-100% but the rebleeding rate from gastric varices still present. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided therapy has recently been introduced as a more effective and safer option than endoscopic therapy for gastric varices. EUS-guided therapy includes EUS guided Cyanoacrylate injection alone or in combination with EUS-guided coiling. It offers the advantage of directly visualizing the varices and delivering targeted therapy. A standard endoscopic examination only allows the evaluation of superficial varices. The use of Endoscopic ultrasound facilitates evaluation of peri-gastric and perforating vessels, which are directly involved in variceal development. EUS also facilitates accurate placement of the coil and preserves the naturally formed splenorenal shunt. Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration(BRTO) has been reported to achieve satisfactory bleeding control rates for isolated gastric varices with High hemostasis rates and low rebleeding rate. Despite all these promising results, there are scarce studies describing and comparing the efficacy of EUS-guided therapy and BRTO in patients with gastric varices. Further prospective comparative studies are needed.

Variceal hemorrhage (VH) from gastric varices (GVs) results in significant morbidity and mortality among patients with liver cirrhosis. In cases of acute bleeding, refractory bleeding, or high risk GVs, the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation and transvenous variceal obliteration procedures have used to treat GVs. While these techniques are effective, each is associated with limitations, including non-trivial rebleeding and hepatic encephalopathy rates for TIPS and aggravation of esophageal varices, development of new or worsening ascites, and formation of difficult to treat ectopic varices for transvenous obliteration. Increasingly, however, TIPS and transvenous obliteration are viewed as complimentary procedures that can be combined to reduce bleeding risk and ameliorate sequelae of portal hypertension. Yet, despite a strong mechanistic basis for their combination, there are few studies investigating the combined effectiveness of TIPS plus transvenous obliteration. Thus, the aim of this single center prospective pilot study is to assess the effectiveness and safety of combined TIPS creation plus transvenous obliteration for the treatment of GVs, with the overall goal of improving the clinical outcomes of patients with VH related to GVs. The work proposed could lead to important advances in the treatment of bleeding complications due to liver cirrhosis.

The patients with GOV1 esophagogastric varices will be treated with gastric variceal tissue gel injection, at the same time, the esophageal varices were treated with ligation, sclerotherapy, or no treatment. A new method for the treatment of esophageal varices will be proposed to improve the effective rate and reduce the recurrence rates and mortality, shorter hospital stays, and lower treatment costs, while further expanding HVPG testing to develop the best strategy for secondary prevention of endoscopic treatment in patients with GOV1 type esophageal and gastric varices.

This seamless, adaptive, two-stage, Phase 2b/3, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, parallel-groups, placebo-controlled study will assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of belapectin compared with placebo in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) cirrhosis and clinical signs of portal hypertension but without esophageal varices at baseline.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is defined as accumulation of fat in the liver which is not related to either alcohol excess or other causes such viral infection, immune-mediated, or medication related which can lead to fibrosis and later-on, cirrhosis. Over the last years NAFLD related liver cirrhosis has become the commonest cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. Portal hypertension is the major complication caused by increased splanchnic blood flow which leads to development of oesophageal varices (OV). Almost all of the patients with portal hypertension can develop OV sometime in their life and one third of those will bleed, hence identifying the presence of OV is a an important aspect of diagnostic workup of these patients with portal hypertension. Upper digestive camera test/endoscopy is the only means to diagnose and grade OV but endoscopy is an invasive procedure and its cost effectiveness for screening is also questionable. These limitations and the ever-increasing workload on endoscopy units has led many researchers to identify some parameters that can non-invasively diagnose OV. Researchers have proposed use of platelet count/spleen diameter ratio, liver stiffness on Fibroscan among many non-invasive tools to predict OV in patients with portal hypertension with success. Recently criteria proposed in Baveno VI conference, (Baveno-IV Criteria) recommended that screening endoscopy can be avoided in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) with liver stiffness measurement (LSM) less than 20 kPa and a platelet count more than than 150,000/μL with an expanded Baveno-IV criteria suggesting platelet count >110 × 109 cells/L and LSM <25 kPa can spare even more endoscopies with a risk of missing varices needing treatment (VNT) being minimal.