Active clinical trials for "Gingival Recession"

BACKGROUND: Several procedures have been reported for the surgical correction of gingival recession (GR), including the laterally positioned flap (LPF) and the coronally advanced flap (CAF), performed as single or two-stage procedures without or with, respectively, the preceding placement and healing of a free gingival graft (FGG). The objective of the present report was to compare the efficacy of single-stage LPF and CAF techniques in the treatment of localized maxillary GR defects. METHODS: Thirty-six patients with Miller class I GR defects were randomly assigned to be treated by either a CAF (n=18) or LPF (n=18). Clinical parameters, including recession height (RECH), the width of keratinized tissue (WKT), probing depth (PD) and vertical clinical attachment level (VAL) were assessed at the mid-buccal site. Visual plaque score (VPS) and bleeding on probing (BOP) were also assessed dichotomously. Clinical recordings were performed at baseline, 6 months and 5 years later. Inter-measurements differences were analyzed with a Chi-square or a Wilcoxon test, with significance set at α<0.05.

A randomized controlled trial of 12-month duration to compare gingival margin location, buccal horizontal ridge dimensions, and interproximal crestal bone levels following two surgical approaches for immediate placement of implants in the esthetic zone: one involving flap elevation and another using a flapless protocol.

The aim of the trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of coronally advanced flap (CAF)+connective tissue graft(CTG)+platelet-rich fibrin(PRF) combination in Miller I and II recession treatment by comparing with CAF+CTG. 40 patients were surgically treated either with CAF+CTG+PRF (test group) or CAF+CTG (control group). Clinical parameters of plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), vertical recession (VR), probing depth (PD), attachment level (AL), keratinized tissue width (KTW), horizontal recession (HR), MGJ localization (L-MGJ), tissue thickness (TT) were recorded at baseline, 3 months (PS1) and 6 months (PS2) post-surgery. Root coverage (RC), complete RC (CRC), attachment gain (AG), and keratinized tissue change (KTC) were also calculated.

The benefits of microsurgical approaches in periodontal therapy have been described. The main focus of this study is to determine if using microsurgical LMCAF technique would improve the outcomes of the therapy for the Miller Class III isolated recession-type defects. Six months results of this study showed that LMCAF with microsurgical approach offered better complete and mean root coverage results over macrosurgical LMCAF technique. The superior effect of microsurgical approach on post-operative morbidity can make this technique more preferable for the patients who expected comfortable postoperative period. This study supports that using the microsurgical aproach with LMCAF procedure significantly affects the clinical and patient-centered success of treating Miller Class III isolated typed defects.

Smoking has a negative effect on the predictability and stability of root coverage procedures because of decreased blood supply and fibroblast activity. Long-term evaluation of this procedure in smokers is important for clinical decision making, because it provides information about the stability of results over time. In smokers, enamel matrix derivative (EMD) used at acellular dermal matrix graft (ADMG)/ soft tissue interface could be an alternative to improve the deficient healing potential, since EMD has the capability of stimulating angiogenesis. At the ADMG/ root surface interface, it could improve the deficient fibroblast activity in smokers and therefore reduce the presence of a long junctional epithelium. The aim of this randomised controlled clinical study was to investigate whether EMD contributes to the root coverage of gingival recessions performed with ADMG in smokers during a 12-month follow-up. Twenty smokers with bilateral Miller Class I or II gingival recessions ≥ 3 mm will be selected. The test group will be treated with an association of ADMG and EMD, and the control group with ADMG alone. Some clinical parameters as: probing depth, relative clinical attachment level, gingival recession height, gingival recession width, keratinized tissue width and keratinized tissue thickness will be evaluated before surgery and after twelve months.

To evaluate the effect of Connective Tissue Graft and Pediculated-Connective Tissue Graft for extraction socket closure on soft tissue landmarks and ridge dimensions.

This studies evaluate the efficacy of the coronally advanced flap (CAF) with or without connective tissue graft (CTG) for the treatment of single maxillary recession associated to non carious cervical lesion (NCCL).

Is PriMatrix wound dressing capable of regenerating gum tissue inside the mouth?

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of dental root coverage using the tunnel technique with connective tissue graft (CTG) and the same technique with collagen matrix for treatment of multiple gingival recessions Miller Class I and II. This study is a randomized-controlled clinical trial of 6 months duration.

The main objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of platelet-rich fibrin membrane used in combination with a coronally advanced flap and to compare it with the use of a subepitelial connective tissue graft in combination with a coronally advanced flap in Miller class I-II bilateral gingival recession treatment