search

Active clinical trials for "Gingival Recession"

Results 121-130 of 278

Connective Tissue Graft Versus Mucograft Collagen Matrix for Coverage of Multiple Gingival Recession...

Gingival Recession

This study deals with coverage of multiple denuded roots. The current standard treatment requires surgical correction and uses soft tissue taken from the roof of the mouth to enhance results. The hypothesis of this trial is that a synthetic collagen matrix (called Mucograft) can be used to replace soft tissue taken from the subject. If the collagen matrix will prove to be equally as effective as the patient own tissue, it will be possible to avoid a more extensive surgery and decrease pain and discomfort.

Completed2 enrollment criteria

A New Therapeutic Approach for Root Coverage

Gingival Recession

Different surgical techniques have been proposed for root coverage, showing varying results especially in areas of deep recessions. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the newly forming bone technique (NFB)as an alternative treatment for Miller class I or II deep recessions, requiring regeneration of lost periodontal tissues. Sample should be comprised of patients aged 18-45 years, both genders, presenting at least one site with marginal tissue recession >4mm. Patients will be randomly assigned to either one of the groups, based on treatment technique: newly forming bone (NFB) or subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG). Clinical examinations will be performed by a single blinded examiner at baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 9 months after surgery. Intra-group analysis will be performed by one way analysis of variance for repeated measures. Inter-group analysis will be performed by unpaired t-test for each of evaluation periods.

Completed6 enrollment criteria

Mechanisms of LPRF Action in the Promotion of Wound Healing and Tissue Regeneration

Gingival Recession

This study evaluates the clinical and biological effects of leucocyte and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) on intraoral wound healing.

Completed11 enrollment criteria

Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix or Palatal Connective Tissue Graft With a Coronally Advanced Flap in...

Gingival Recession

The purpose of this multi-center study is to compare the effectiveness of Mucograft versus connective tissue graft in combination with coronal advanced flap for the treatment of Miller class III recessions The connective tissue graft in combination with coronal advanced flap is considered the gold standard for the treatment of gingival recession in terms of percentage of root coverage and complete root coverage. However connective tissue graft harvesting from the palatal mucosa is often associated with increased patient morbidity, prolonged surgical time and is limited supply. To overcome these inconvenients many efforts are made to develop new materials (healing modifiers, barrier membranes and grafts substitutes) Recently a new two-layer , xenogenic collagen matrix (Mucograft: Geistlich Pharma , Wolhusen Switzerland) has been proposed for regenerative therapy involving teeth and implants. The use of this porcine collagen matrix has obtained promising results for treatment of Miller class I and II recession defects (isolated and multiple recession defects) The mayority of root coverage studies in the literature treats Miller class I and II recession defects .Surgical treatment of class III recesión defects is more challenging due to loss of interproximal bone and soft tissues and complete root coverage may not be expected . But some recent studies demonstrate complete root coverage and high percentage of root coverage in class III recessions. Also a new classification system using the level of interproximal attachment level has been proposed to predict the final root coverage outcome. So ,the soft tissue substitutes should be used also in Miller class III recession, and because of that fact, the investigators are conducting this study, to evaluate the effectiveness of Mucograft in Miller class III recessions compared with connective tissue graft.

Completed9 enrollment criteria

Evaluation of Root Coverage by Connective Graft and Different Root Conditioning Adjunctive Therapies...

Gingival RecessionGingival Recession1 more

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of two different treatment agents used in conjunction with subepithelial connective graft technique on root coverage outcomes in multiple recession defects. Half of patients will receive root treatment with antimicrobial photodynamic therapy and the other half will receive photobiomodulation therapy by laser on surgery site.

Completed14 enrollment criteria

Hydroxyapetite Nanoparticles, Tricalcium Phosphate Nanoparticles, and PRF for Treatment of Gingival...

Periodontitis

The aim of the present study was to compare between nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate carried on PRP membrane in treatment of Miller's class 1 gingival recession in human.

Completed11 enrollment criteria

Flap Thickness Upon Root Coverage With the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix

Gingival RecessionPeriodontal Attachment Loss2 more

OrACell has been tested as a barrier in bone regenerative procedures showing promising results in new bone formation after socket preservation, but no data is available on root coverage procedures. Moreover, it has been suggested that keratinized tissue width (KTW) ≥2mm and gingival thickness (GT) ≥1.2 mm at 6 months of the surgical procedures are two important predictors for long term stability of gingival margin Therefore, it was hypothesized that soft tissue thickness and keratinized tissue width may influence the percentage of root coverage. By means of a prospective case series (12 patients in total), the aim is to study the performance of the OrACell dermal matrix in the treatment of multiple and adjacent gingival recessions, determining the amount of complete root coverage obtained at 6 months of follow-up. At the same time, it is intended to evaluate the effect of initial gingival thickness, by means of digital scanning, upon the success of root coverage procedure with OrACell.

Completed12 enrollment criteria

PRF for Treating Maxillary Gingival Recession

Gingival Recession

This is a split-mouth, randomized, controlled clinical trial that aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) membranes in conjunction with coronally advanced flap (CAF) in treating maxillary gingival recession defects.

Completed5 enrollment criteria

Effect of Dose-dependent Platelet Rich Fibrin(PRF)

Gingival Recession

Miller Class I Gingival Recessions (GR) have been treated by using Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF) with Platelet Rich Fibrin membrane (PRF membrane) or Connective Tissue Graft (CTG). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different multiple layers of PRF membranes for the treatment of GR and compare the results with CTG procedure.

Completed9 enrollment criteria

Titanium Prepared Platelet Rich Fibrin for Multiple Gingival Recessions

Gingival Recession

Objective: Titanium-prepared platelet-rich fibrin (T-PRF) is activated with titanium, which results in a more mature and aggregated form than PRF. In our previous studies, we established that the fibrin carpet formed with titanium had a firmer network structure, and longer resorption time in the tissue than the fibrin carpet formed with glass. The purpose of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to compare the effects of autogenous T-PRF and CTG. Materials and methods: A total 114 Miller Class I/II gingival recessions with abrasion defects will be treated either T-PRF (63 teeth) or CTG (51 teeth) using a modified tunnel technique. Clinical periodontal indexes, keratinized tissue (KTW), gingival thickness (GT) and recession depth (RD) will be recorded before surgery and at 6 and 12-month follow-up examinations. The Visual Analog Scale and healing index scores will be assessed.

Completed10 enrollment criteria
1...121314...28

Need Help? Contact our team!


We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs