Composite Resin Plus Connective Tissue Graft.
Gingival RecessionThe aim of the present study is to evaluate the clinical, aesthetic and patient-centered parameters of connective tissue graft associated or not with composite resin for the treatment of gingival recession.
Acellular Dermal Matrix Allograft Versus Free Gingival Graft
Gingiva AtrophyGingivitisThe present split-mouth controlled randomized clinical trial aimed to evaluate clinical and histological results of acellular dermal matrix allograft (ADM) compared to autogenous free gingival graft (FGG)
Use of Platelet Rich Fibrin in Addition to CAF and SCTG for Treatment of Gingival Recession
Gingival RecessionThis research will be conducted in an attempt to achieve complete root coverage with physiologic probing depth and a harmonious view with the adjacent tissues using Platelet rich fibrin in conjunction with Coronally advanced flap and subepithelial connective tissue graft.
OrACELL™ vs. Connective Tissue in Miller Class 3 Defects
Gingival RecessionThe purpose was to compare root coverage outcomes between autogenous connective tissue graft (CTG) and decellularized human dermis (OrACELL™) in areas of facial gingival recession.
Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions
Gingival RecessionGingival recession (GR) is frequently associated with deterioration in dental esthetics and dental hypersensitivity. Outcomes from recent systematic reviews have demonstrated that when the root is covered and the gain in the width of keratinized tissue (KT) is expected, the use of subepithelial connective tissue grafts (SCTGs) associated with coronally advanced flaps (CAF) appears to be more predictable, and may be considered the gold standard procedure. However, the SCTGs may increase patients' morbidity (e.g., pain). This occurs because of the need for a donor surgical area, which may increase the risk of surgical complications like bleeding, as well as increases post-operative discomfort and the period of the surgical procedure. Another biomaterial, a new collagen matrix (CM) has been used as a substitute for the SCTG. The use of CM was associated with a significant reduction in post-operative morbidity, less post-operative pain and discomfort in the patient, and more esthetic satisfaction.
Comparison of Two Flaps for Root Coverage
Gingival RecessionThe aim of this study was to compare clinical, esthetic and patient-centered outcomes of coronally advanced tunnel (TUN) and coronally advanced flap (CAF) both associated with connective tissue graft (CTG) in the treatment of gingival recession.
A New Surgical-restorative Approach to Treat Gingival Recessions Associated With Non-carious Cervical...
Gingival RecessionTooth AbrasionThe aim of the present study is to evaluate the clinical, aesthetic and patient-centered parameters of connective tissue graft associated or not with partial resin composite (RC) for the treatment of gingival recession with NCCL, performed before the surgical procedure.
Evaluation of Two Types of Matrix (Mucograft® and Mucoderm®) Associated With Coronally Advanced...
Gingival RecessionThe aim of this study is to evaluate clinically the results of two types of matrix (Geistlich Mucograft® and Mucoderm®) associated with CAF technique for the treatment of gingival recessions.
Comparative Evaluation of CTG With and Without rhPDGF- BB Using Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel...
Gingival RecessionThe present study is a human, prospective, single centre, single blind, comparative controlled randomized clinical trial for the treatment of Miller's Class I, II or combination of class I and II mandibular recession and comparing the clinical outcomes prior to and 6 months after treatment. The trial is in accordance to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) criteria, 2010.
Patient Morbidity After Palatal Free Gingival Grafts With or Without PRF Membranes Coverage
Postoperative PainPostoperative Complications1 moreThis study evaluates postoperative morbidity of patients that undergo free gingival graft harvesting from palate with or without use of autogenous PRF (Platelet Rich Fibrin) membranes to cover the donor site.In the Test Group venous blood sampling was done in order to prepare PRF membranes used to cover the donor site, whereas in Control Group hemostatic agents with oxidized and regenerated cellulosa were used.