search

Active clinical trials for "Gingival Recession"

Results 231-240 of 278

Use of Scaffolds for Treatment of Gingival Recession Associated With Interproximal Tissue Deficiency...

RecessionPeriodontal Diseases

This study will seek to evaluate the predictability and efficacy of a Computer Aided Design-Computer Aided Manufacturing and additively manufactured polycaprolactone and hydroxyapatite scaffolds in these defects compared to traditional guided tissue regeneration. 40 gingival recessions associated with interproximal tissue deficiency will be divided into two groups: control group (autogenous bone + collagen membrane; n = 20) and test group (autogenous bone + scaffold; n = 20).

Unknown status12 enrollment criteria

TECHNIQUES USED IN EVALUATION OF GINGIVAL PHENOTYPE

Gingival Recession

This study evaluates the 4 different techniques used in clinical measurement of gingival phenotype. 1) Tranclusency of UNC-15 Periodontal Probe, 2) Transgingival probing with Endodontic file (#20), 3)Transgingival Probing with Modified Florida Probe and 4) Translucency Colorvue Biotype Probe. The aim of our study is to evaluate the reliability and applicability of the current examination methods recommended in order to improve the deficiencies of the traditional examination methods used in the evaluation of the gingival phenotype.

Completed10 enrollment criteria

Efficacy of a Modified Technique of Free Gingival Graft in Volumetric Changes of the Graft: Randomized...

Gingival Recession

This study will compare a new technique of free gingival graft to the original one, in order to evaluate the stability of the graft volume over one year and other variables. Twenty patients will receive the original technique of free gingival graft (controls) and twenty patients will receive the modified technique, in which the free gingival graft is submerged (tests), at the inferior incisors area.

Unknown status14 enrollment criteria

Treatment Off Gingival Recession Defects Using a Xenogenic Acellular Dermal Matrix Compared to Connective...

Gingival Recession

Limitation of donor site and significant postoperative morbidity are often described in connective tissue graft harvesting. We want to show if mucoderm used in tunnel technique to recover miller class I and II recessions defects could be an alternative to connective tissue graft.

Unknown status27 enrollment criteria

Patient Satisfaction After Root Coverage Using VISTA Technique Compared to MCAF Technique With PRF....

Gingival Recession

VISTA technique with PRF compared to MCAF technique with PRF to treat gingival recession

Unknown status2 enrollment criteria

Mucoderm or Connective Tissue Graft for Treatment of Gingival Recessions

Gingival Recession

Coronally advanced flap plus connective tissue graft (CTG) is the gold standard therapy for root coverage. The bioabsorbable porcine collagen matrix (CM) has been widely used in periodontal and mucogingival surgery as a substitute for CTG and has achieved similar results. The CM has the advantage of no need of a second surgical area and availability overcoming the limitations of donor site in autograft. The aim of this study is to investigate the use of Mucoderm® in root coverage procedures combined with extended coronally positioned flap (ECAF), test group (TG), in comparison to the connective tissue graft associated with the ECAF, control group (CG).

Unknown status6 enrollment criteria

Ultrasonic vs Radiographic Measurement of Gingival Biotype. A Novel Method

Gingival Recession

This clinical study consists on taking 2 different records of the upper and lower incisors area : 1) a perpendicular x-ray and 2) an ultrasonic measurement of gingival thickness on the labial plate. Both measurements are used in order to measure gingival and bone thickness. The aim was to verify the reliability of the tissue measurements of an ultrasonic technique compared with the radiographic technique and to verify whether the biotype has correlation between the maxillary and mandibular biotype in the same patient.

Completed9 enrollment criteria

Tuberosity Versus Palatal Donor Site for Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft in Root Coverage...

Gingival Recession

Gingival recessions are characterized by the apical migration of the marginal gingivae toward the cemento-enamel junction. Our team in France reported that 84,6% of the population exhibited gingival recession. Other epidemiologic data report that 25% of an american population exhibit recessions deeper than 3mm. Recessions may be associated with thermic or mecanic related pains and increased wear of the roots. It may causes aesthetic prejudice on smiling. It may also complicate prosthetic reconstruction when the volume of tissue are insufficient. A study on a Brazilian population reported that recessions negatively impacted the quality of life in terms of esthetics and root sensitivity. Many surgical procedures have been created to treat these recessions. Most of them include a gingival graft by mean of a sub-epithelial connective tissue graft. Usually it is harvested in the hard palate. However, the early healing of the palate may be associated with important pain and discomfort. Another harvesting site is the retromolar tuberosity. It seems to be of higher tissular quality and lower healing complications. However its limited volume prevent the harvesting of large graft. Almost no studies have compared the clinical outcome between palatal and tuberosity graft. A retrospective study of our team reported higher rate of complet root coverage with tuberosity graft versus palatal graft (OR=3,78 IC95%). After this observational study, our work introduce a interventional comparison between the two harvesting sites.

Unknown status19 enrollment criteria

Guided Creeping Technique (GCT) in Treating Gingival Recession

Gingival Recession

A novel minimally invasive guided creeping technique (GCT) is suggested to treat gingival recessions.

Unknown status9 enrollment criteria

Use of Leucocyte- and Platelet-rich Fibrin Membranes in Single Implant

Tooth LossRecession1 more

The objective of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to evaluate the increase of soft tissue thickness around single implants installed in maxillary esthetic area with the use of Leucocyte-Platelet rich Fibrin (L-PRF) membranes. The sample is of 42 individuals, where the control group (n = 21) will receive single implant placement only, while the test group will receive single implant placement with L-PRF membranes.

Unknown status13 enrollment criteria
1...232425...28

Need Help? Contact our team!


We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs