Active clinical trials for "Gingival Recession"

The purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate the gingival margin changes resulting from the treatment with biologically oriented preparation technique (B.O.P.T.) of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL). In particular, the quantification of the cervical margin is carried out by an intraoral scanning device, both in length and width.

In a recent meta-analysis, Graziani et al. reported that despite the "ideal" treatment for multiple gingival recession defects is not yet identified, there are some indirect suggestions from the analyzed data that, in comparison to the traditional coronally advanced flap (CAF) approach, the use of additional grafting, modifications of the flap technique or tunnel variation with connective tissue graft (CTG) may improve clinical results. Furthermore, various allografts or replacement biomaterials have been developed instead of a connective tissue graft in order to reduce patient morbidity. A newly developed porcine-derived bio-resorbable collagen matrix (CM) (Fibro-Gide) has been recently introduced as an alternative to CTG in periodontal plastic surgery. The aim of this study will be to compare the outcomes of two muco-gingival surgery techniques, the modified coronali advanced flap (MCAF) for multiple recession defects and the modified coronally advanced tunnel technique (MCAT), performed in the Department of Periodontology of San Raffaele Hospital with the results reported in the literature. Secondarily, the study will evaluate whether patients report a preference in terms of discomfort and perception of aesthetics between the two surgical techniques.

The primary purpose of this protocol is to isolate, investigate and compare the regenerative and differentiation potential of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC's) in the gingival (gum) tissue harvested from two different locations from the roof of the mouth (palate), that is from the front part(premolar)and back part(molar). MSC's are known for their capacity to form different kinds of hard and soft tissue including bone, fibers for periodontal ligaments, cementum and dentin, thus this study can help in optimizing their clinical application and transplantation approaches in tissue regeneration.

Gingival recession is a common condition and its extent and prevalence increase with age. Majority of patients probably present with localized and shallow gingival recession that need a specific treatment because they are susceptible to further apical displacement of gingival margin. So if gingival recession is detected early, removal of causative factors and non surgical treatments initiated then it can prevent more advanced mucogingival defects. Studies have shown that non surgical periodontal therapy including proper oral hygiene instructions, periodic scaling and root planning obtained successful root coverage in shallow gingival recession. Minimal invasive non surgical periodontal therapy (MINST)uses the delicate instruments and magnifying loupes performing periodontal debridement with more effective calculus and biofilm removal and less soft tissue trauma , maintain the tissue architecture, benefit the healing phase, improve the clinical results and increase visibility. There is no study to evaluate efficacy of MINST versus conventional subgingival instrumentation in the restorative capacity of marginal gingival in RT1 gingival recession , so the present study will be conducted to compare and evaluate the efficacy of minimal invasive non surgical periodontal therapy (MINST) and conventional subgingival instrumentation in the restorative capacity of marginal gingiva involving RT1 gingival recession.

The objective of this project is to evaluate short-term and 1-year outcomes of treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recession defects (MAGRD) using the coronally advanced flap (CAF) with either conventional CTG (control group) or meshed CTG (mesh-CTG) (test group).

The overall objective of this project is to evaluate, over a period of 1 year, the outcomes of either conventional free gingival graft (FGG) or mesh-FGG to increase the width of keratinized mucosa (KM) at implant sites.

This study aims to assess the effect of micro-needling together with coronally advanced flap procedure on the gain of gingival thickness (GT) and keratinized tissue width (KTW) and compare it to Alloderm with coronally advanced flap procedure in the management of thin periodontal phenotype associated with recession type 1 (RT1)

Free gingival grafting surgeries require palatal grafts harvesting from the patient own palates . The donor sites pain , infection and retarded healing by secondary intension are the complication .

Comparison of the clinical effectiveness of self etch adhesive and fluoride varnish in reducing dentin hypersensitivity in patients with gingival recession. A Randomized Clinical Trial ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the clinical effectiveness of self etch adhesive and fluoride varnish in reducing dentin hypersensitivity in patients with gingival recession Study Design: Randomized Clinical Trial Place of Study: Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Peshawar Dental College, Warsak Road. Methodology: 142 diagnosed cases of Dentin hypersensitivity from outpatient department of nephrology, Prime Hospital Peshawar will be referred to operative department, Peshawar dental college for Comparison of the clinical effectiveness of self etch adhesive and fluoride varnish in reducing dentin hypersensitivity in patients with gingival recession. Results: Conclusion:

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the dimensional changes in the short and long-term in patients with thin gum tissues who have gum grafts placed on either denuded bone or gum grafts placed on a bone with some tissues remaining. The main question this study aims to answer is: - Does the placement of free-epithelized gingival grafts (gum grafts) on full thickness bed preparation (having all of the tissue removed from the bone) lead to similar clinical, digital, and patient-related outcomes and measurements over a period of 12 months versus split thickness bed preparation (where a small layer of tissue is left over the bone) in patients with thin gum tissue phenotypes (gum tissue is generally less than 1.5 millimeters) who are in need of soft tissue augmentation procedures? Participants will be asked to attend 8 visits, which include: (i) screening visit, (ii) prophylaxis visit, (iii) random assignment to Group A or Group B along with surgery and digital data collection, (iv) 2-week post-operative visit, (v) 6-week post-operative visit, (vi) 3-month follow-up visit, (vii) 6-month follow-up visit, (viii) 12-month follow-up visit. Also, Group A will have a free epithelialized gingival/mucosal graft (gum graft) placed on full thickness periosteal bed preparation where all of the tissue was removed (test group). Group B will have a free epithelialized gingival/mucosal graft (gum graft) on split thickness periosteal bed preparation where only a portion of the tissue was removed (control group). Researchers will compare Group A and Group B to see if there is a difference in clinical, digital, and patient-related outcomes and measurements over a period of 12 months.