Active clinical trials for "Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal"

The purpose of this study is to determine if two allergy medications (azelastine and fluticasone) are more effective than placebo or either medication alone (azelastine or fluticasone)

This study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a new drug on congestion in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis. This effect will be compared to placebo and to the decongestant, pseudoephedrine.

The primary objective of this study is to determine the efficacy and onsets of action of single-dose fexofenadine hydrochloride 180 mg and montelukast sodium 10 mg relative to placebo. Secondary objectives are to compare the safety and efficacy of fexofenadine hydrochloride 180 mg, montelukast sodium 10 mg, and placebo

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effect of nasal carbon dioxide in the treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

This study is in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) and will compare the effect versus placebo of repeat doses of intranasal GSK256066 using the Vienna Challenge Chamber. GSK256066 is a potent and highly selective phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) inhibitor, currently in development by GSK for the treatment of allergic rhinitis, asthma and COPD. Subjects will be selected on the basis that they display a defined moderate response to the pre-determined dose used. This study aims to explore the actions of repeat doses of intranasal GSK256066 in patients with Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis in the Vienna Challenge Chamber compared to placebo. 12-lead ECG, vital signs and adverse event enquiries will be made throughout the study. Nasal examination, symptom scores (TNSS), nasal lavage, nasal scrape and allergen challenge assessments will also be performed at various time points throughout the study.

Controlled conditions of the EEU allow a reliable assessment of the efficacy and a determination of the action onset, action intensity and duration of effect of levocetirizine and cetirizine in order to establish the relative efficacy of these two drugs available for the treatment of SAR.

This study is designed to assess the safety and tolerability of single, escalating oral doses and repeat oral doses (7 days, once daily) of GSK835726 in healthy male subjects

Various chemical modifications of allergens have been attempted to enhance efficacy, improve safety, and foster compliance with IT. These approaches have been unsuccessful - in that the allergenicity and immunogenicity have either decreased, or increased in tandem, with no resultant efficacy: safety benefit ratio. This study utilizes an adjuvant approach in which synthetic immunostimulatory DNA is conjugated to ragweed allergen in an attempt to modulate both the clinical and immunologic allergic response to ragweed exposure in ragweed-allergic patients with seasonal rhinitis.

To investigate the safety and tolerability of successive single rising doses of SLIT in subjects with allergic rhinitis and to investigate the safety and tolerability of multi high dose regimens of SLIT in subjects with allergic rhinitis.

Evaluate the relative efficacy of four dosing regimens of bilastine tablets (given either once or twice per day) versus placebo in patients with Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR) in the Mountain Cedar season in south Texas and Oklahoma based on the mean change from baseline in Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Scores (TNSS) assessed over 14 days of treatment.