Active clinical trials for "Myocardial Infarction"

Oxygen treatment is widely used in acutely ill patients, both pre-hospital and in hospital. The indication for oxygen is sometimes unquestionable, such as in many hypoxic patients, but in other situations its use is more of a practise and much less based on scientific evidence. In particular, oxygen treatment is routinely used in patients with a suspected heart attack and variably recommended in guidelines, despite very limited data supporting a beneficial effect. Indeed, a few studies even indicate that oxygen treatment might be harmful. Immediate re-opening of the acutely blocked artery to the heart muscle is the treatment of choice to limit permanent injury. However, the sudden re-initiation of blood flow achieved with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the reopening and stenting of the blocked vessel, can give rise to further endothelial and myocardial damage, so-called reperfusion injury. Ischemia and reperfusion associated myocardial injury (IR-injury) involves a wide range of pathological processes. Vascular leakage, activation of cell death programs, thrombocytes and white blood cells leading to extended inflammation and formation of clots are examples of those effects. The role of oxygen treatment on these pathological processes, on the extent of IR-injury and the final infarct size in patients with acute myocardial infarctions (AMI) has not previously been studied. In an ongoing national multicentre, randomized, registry based clinical trial, the DETO2X-AMI trial (NCT01787110), the effect of oxygen on morbidity and mortality in ACS patients is being investigated. The present DETO2X-biomarkers study is a substudy of the DETO2X-AMI trial, evaluating the effect of oxygen treatment on biological systems involved in the pathogenesis of reversible and irreversible myocardial damage and cell death in ACS.

Patients with heart attacks caused by blocked coronary arteries are usually treated with a technique called primary angioplasty. Although this treatment is very successful it can result in damage to the heart muscle when the artery is opened due to reperfusion injury. Cooling the entire body has been shown to reduce heart muscle damage during heart attacks in some patients but not in others, however it is uncomfortable due to the shivering, expensive and can result in delays in opening the blocked artery. We are investigating a simpler way to cool the heart muscle directly using cooled fluid passed through the catheter without the shortcomings of entire body cooling. This pilot will address safety and feasibility considerations.

The primary objective of the RIC-STEMI trial is to assess whether remote ischaemic conditioning (RIC) as an adjunctive therapy during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) can improve clinical outcomes as assessed by death from cardiac-cause or hospitalization for heart failure (HF) for a minimum follow-up period of 12 months.

The purpose of the IMPRESSION study is to determine whether intravenous administration of morphine prior to ticagrelor administration in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients and in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients alters the plasma concentrations of ticagrelor and its active metabolite and whether it is associated with any negative impact on the antiplatelet effect of ticagrelor.

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of reduced doses (10 mg and 20 mg) of intra-coronary alteplase compared with placebo as an adjunct to PCI in reducing MVO and its consequences in high risk patients with STEMI.

Outcomes of patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are directly related to reperfusion time. Effect of transradial approach (left vs right) on reperfusion time has not been fully studied for SETMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of this study was to randomly investigate the efficacy and safety of left radial approach for primary PCI in STEMI patients compared with right radial approach.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of death worldwide. Dietary patterns and functional foods may play an important role in the management of cardiovascular risk factors such as overweight and dyslipidemia, as well as inflammation and oxidative stress. However, little is known regarding the effect of diets or specific nutrients on these parameters in individuals with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The Brazilian Cardioprotective Diet (DicaBr) is based on Brazilian nutritional guidelines and also in a unique and ludic nutritional strategy. In a pilot study, this diet was effective in reducing blood pressure (intragroup comparison) and body weight (intergroup comparison) in individuals with established cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, the effectiveness of this dietary pattern supplemented with different kind of nuts is unknown. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of the DicaBr supplemented or not with 30g/day of different nuts on cardiometabolic parameters in patients with recent AMI. In this parallel randomized controlled trial, 388 patients ≥40 years with a recent diagnosis of AMI (60 to 180 days) will be allocated to one of two study groups: 1) DicaBr group (DCB, control group); or 2) DicaBr group supplemented with mixed nuts (DCBN, intervention group). All patients will receive the same dietary prescription, the DCBN group also will receive 30g/day of nuts (10g of peanuts, 10g of cashew nuts and 10g of Brazilian nuts). A pilot study including 100 individuals who will receive only peanuts (30g/day) will be conducted. The primary outcome will be LDL-cholesterol (LDL-c) levels after 16 weeks. In the baseline and at the end of the study (16 weeks), lipid and glycemic profile and anthropometric indexes will be evaluated in both groups; inflammatory and oxidative stress markers, and adipokines will be evaluated in a subsample. It is expected that DicaBr supplemented with nuts will be superior to DicaBr alone to benefit patients with AMI regarding cardiometabolic parameters.

The objective of the present study is to establish the safety and efficacy of MiSaver® Stem Cell Treatment After a Heart Attack (Acute Myocardial Infarction)

Brief Summary: This study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial aimed to compare the reperfusion strategy and clinical outcomes of STEMI patients treated by angiography-guided vs. OCT-guided PCI. Patients presenting STEMI with coronary artery diameter stenosis ≤70% and TIMI blood flow grade 3 at index or after thrombus aspiration are randomly assigned to either an OCT-guided group or an angiography-guided group. In OCT-guided group, stent implantation or conservative medical treatment is determined based on OCT findings. Conservative non-stenting strategy will be recommended in those with culprit plaque erosions, certain ruptures without dissection and hematoma, SCAD without obstructive stenosis. In the angiography-guided group, reperfusion strategy is decided by the operators according to the local practice. The rate of stenting during primary PCI and clinical outcomes at 1-month and 1-year are collected.

The objective of this study is to assess efficacy and safety of Pressure-controlled intermittent Coronary Sinus Occlusion (PiCSO) therapy started post flow restoration but prior to stenting during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared to standard PCI in the setting of acute ST-segment elevation anterior myocardial infarction (STEMI).