Active clinical trials for "Myocardial Infarction"

Background: Bilberries from Sweden, rich in polyphenols, have shown cholesterol-lowering effects in small studies, and the cholesterol-lowering properties of oats, with abundant beta-glucans and potentially bioactive phytochemicals, are well established. Both may provide cardiometabolic benefits following acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but large studies of adequate statistical power and appropriate duration are needed to confirm clinically relevant treatment effects. No previous study has evaluated the potential additive or synergistic effects of bilberry combined with oats on cardiometabolic risk factors. Design: This is a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Our primary objective is to assess cardioprotective effects of diet supplementation with dried bilberry and with bioprocessed oat bran, with a secondary explorative objective of assessing their combination, compared with a neutral isocaloric reference supplement, initiated within five days following percutaneous coronary intervention for AMI. Patients will be randomized 1:1:1:1 to a three-month intervention. The primary endpoint is the difference in LDL cholesterol change between the intervention groups after three months. The major secondary endpoint is exercise capacity at three months. Other secondary endpoints include plasma concentrations of biochemical markers of inflammation, metabolomics and gut microbiota composition after three months. Implications: Secondary prevention after AMI has improved during the last decades but readmissions and death following AMI remain large health care challenges. Controlling hyperlipidemia and inflammation is critical to preventing new cardiovascular events, but novel pharmacological treatments for these conditions are expensive and associated with negative side effects. If bilberry and/or oat, in addition to standard medical therapy, can lower LDL cholesterol and inflammation more than standard therapy alone, this could be a cost-effective and safe dietary strategy for secondary prevention after AMI.

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is an emergent disease to treat as soon as possible. 2017 ESC guidelines for the management of STEMI recommend using radial approach (RA) rather than femoral approach (FA) to reduce mortality and bleeding complications if the operators are expert for RA. Recently, Ferdinand Kiemeneij reported that distal radial approach (DRA) could be a feasible and safe route for coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in 70 patients. The right-handed patient could feel more comfortable in left DRA than right RA. Left DRA also could provide a better comfortable position for the operator compared to left RA. Distal radial artery is located around the anatomical snuffbox, which doesn't contain nerve and vein beside artery. Therefore, the possibility of procedure-related complications such as nerve injury or arteriovenous fistula is very low. Also, the superficial location of DRA could make easier hemostasis. There were no vascular-related complications from the report of Kiemeneij. But, the rate of puncture failure was 11%, which was higher than RA-based study (5.34% in STEMI patients of RIVAL trial, 6% in RIFLESTEACS trial and 5.8% in MATRIX trial). Nevertheless, this study was a pilot study with a small number of patients. There is no clinical study to compare the feasibility and safety for CAG and PCI between DRA and RA in patients with STEMI. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate whether DRA is feasible and safe compared to RA in STEMI setting.

The study is a multi-centre, Open-label, Randomized Controlled, 1:1 trial comparing Prasugrel-based short DAPT (30-45 days) followed by Prasugrel monotherapy versus standard DAPT regimen in STEMI patients in terms of safety and efficacy endpoints. In the subgroup of STEMI patients with MVD, a sub-randomization will allow a comparison between a complete revascularization OCT-guided versus complete revascularization angiography-guided stent in terms of efficacy and safety endpoints.

The present study is planned to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the Booster Balloon catheter when applied to STEMI patients. The Booster Balloon is a spiral balloon intended to be positioned in the coronary sinus, enabling continuous venous draining while reducing flow and increasing the pressure inside the venous capillaries, and redistributing blood and oxygen to the border zone of the ischemic myocardium. This pilot, first-in-human study is designed to evaluate (in addition to safety and feasibility) the treatment modality in the setting of acute STEMI, as adjunctive therapy after restoring blood blow through the infract-related artery.

The aim of the study is to determine whether discontinuation of β-blocker after at least 1 year of β-blocker therapy is noninferior to continuation of β-blocker in patients without heart failure (HF) or left ventricular systolic dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Prospective, open-label, randomized, multicenter, noninferiority trial to determine whether discontinuation of β-blocker after at least 1 year of β-blocker therapy is noninferior to continuation of β-blocker in patients without HF or left ventricular systolic dysfunction after AMI.

Rationale: Heart attacks are a major cause of death and result from coronary blood clots that require acute coronary intervention and antithrombotic drugs to restore blood flow and prevent new heart attacks. Over time, more potent antithrombotic drugs have been introduced like prasugrel and ticagrelor. These drugs have replaced the older drug, clopidogrel, as approximately 30% of patients are low-responders to clopidogrel for genetic reasons. However, the newer drugs introduce a significant risk of serious bleeding. Aim: The aim of this trial is to assess a reduced antithrombotic strategy for high bleeding risk patients with heart attacks to reduce bleeding safely. Hypothesis: Significantly reduced bleeding with a similar preventive effect are expected. Design: The Dan-DAPT trial include high bleeding risk patients with heart attacks from Danish hospitals (Rigshospitalet, Aarhus, Odense, Aalborg, Roskilde, and Gentofte hospital) and randomize them to standard-of-care or shorter and individualized antithrombotic therapy based on responsiveness to clopidogrel after genetic testing.

Rationale: Patients with acute coronary syndromes are at an increased risk for recurrent adverse coronary events, particularly during the early period following their initial presentation. Early (in-hospital) initiation of high-intensity statins reduces the risk of recurrent events and is therefore recommended by the best current practice guidelines.(1,2) However, the delayed onset of action of statin therapy and given the frequent failure of patients to achieve the recommended LDL-C targets using statins alone (as per the current practice guidelines recommendations), might be placing large number of patients at increased risk during such a vulnerable period early after an ACS.(3) More rapid and effective reduction of LDL-C levels using combination therapy from the outset may therefore be beneficial in these patients. This hypothesis has been tested with combining Evolocumab and a statin in the recent EVOPACS study, in which this combination after ACS has shown to be safe and more effective in achieving LDL-C targets at 6 weeks compared to statin monotherapy.(4) However, Evolocumab (a PCSK9i) is an expensive drug which is not affordable by many healthcare systems in low- and middle-income countries. Ezetemibe, on the other hand, is a safe and a cheap drug that can prove to be extremely cost-effective if a meaningful and timely reduction in LDL-C levels can be achieved when combined with a statin early after an ACS. Study population Patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction, with baseline LDL-C levels not likely to achieve recommended targets on statin monotherapy. This is assumed to be with LDL-C level > 125 mg/dl for those not on lipid lowering therapy; or with LDL-C > 100 mg/dl on moderate intensity statin therapy at the time of presentation. Study design Prospective randomized controlled single-blinded trial. A sample size of 500 patients, 250 in each arm, was calculated to provide a power of 0.9 and an adjusted type 1 error as 0.05. Primary outcomes Percentage of patients achieving target LDL-C levels (<70 mg/dl) at 6 weeks interval. (Efficacy endpoint) Freedom from alanine transaminase elevation (ALT) more than 3 folds upper reference limit "URL" or statin associated muscle symptoms associated with CK elevation more than 4 folds URL. (Safety endpoint) Secondary outcomes Percentage of patients achieving > 50% reduction of LDL-C and to levels below 70mg/dl at 6 weeks interval. Percentage of LDL-C reduction at 6 weeks interval. Reduction of high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) from baseline to 6 weeks interval. Correlating statins efficacy to reduce LDL-C and likelihood to cause statins related adverse effects to genetic alleles of ABC [ATP Binding Cassette] types A1, G5 and G8, and of CYP450 isoenzymes. MACE free survival at 1 year, (CV death; non fatal-MI; hospitalization for ACS, urgent unplanned revascularization and stroke).

Many patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) have multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD), which is associated with poor clinical outcomes. However, there have been few studies regarding revascularization strategy in patients with NSTEMI and MVD. Therefore, we planned to perform prospective, open-label, randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of immediate complete revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI] for both infarct-related artery [IRA] and non-IRA during index PCI) compared to staged PCI strategy of non-IRA (PCI for IRA followed by non-IRA PCI after several days). PCI procedure at non-IRA with diameter stenosis between 50 and 69% should be conducted with the aid of fractional flow reserve (FFR), and non-IRA with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% will be revascularized without FFR.

The objective of this randomized, controlled pilot study is to determine the efficacy of Deferiprone to reduce the amount of free unbound iron inside the hemorrhagic zone of myocardial infarction among hemorrhagic myocardial infarction patients.

Results from recent clinical trials on bone marrow mononuclear cell (BM-MNC) transplantation show that this intervention can help reduce the incidence of heart failure (HF) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, no study has evaluated the effect of the transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) on a clinical endpoint such as HF. This single-blinded, randomized, multicenter trial aims to establish whether the intracoronary infusion of umbilical cord-derived Wharton's jelly MSCs (WJ-MSCs) helps prevent HF development after AMI. The study will enroll 240 patients 3 to 7 days following an AMI treated with primary percutaenous coronary intervention (PPCI). Only patients aged below 65 years with impaired LV function (LVEF < 40%) will be included. They will be randomized to receive either a single intracoronary infusion of WJ-MSCs or standard care. The primary outcome of this study is the assessment of HF development during long-term follow-up (four years). Since the efficacy of MSCs is higher than BM-MNCs after AMI in the improvement of LVEF, it would be probable that these cells may have a better clinical effect as well. However, no study has evaluated the impact of the transplantation of MSCs on a clinical endpoint such as HF. This study will help determine whether or not the infusion of intracoronary WJ-MSCs in patients