Active clinical trials for "Heart Failure"

This is a multi-center, randomized, double-blind , placebo parallel controlled, standard therapy based phase III clinical trial, to evaluate the efficacy of recombinant human neuregulin-1 on cardiac remodeling, as well as safety in patients with chronic heart failure.

This was a multinational, multicenter, randomized, open-label study to confirm and expand the efficacy, safety and tolerability evidence of 48 hours intravenous infusion of serelaxin (30 micrograms/kg/day) when added to Standard of Care (SoC) in patients admitted to hospital for Acute Heart Failure (AHF).

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of intracoronary SERCA2a Gene transfer on cardiac volumes and function using multimodality cardiac imaging.

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of intravenous infusion of serelaxin, when added to standard therapy, in acute heart failure (AHF) patients.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate efficacy of rhNRG-1 in reducing the death rate of heart failure.

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of an intravenous infusion of serelaxin on top of standard of care therapy, in pediatric patients with acute heart failure (AHF)

The pilot study aims to compare the results of using a new respirator (OPTIFLOW TM-High-Flow-Machine) with those from Standard-Oxygen-Therapy during the stabilization of patients who have been hospitalized due to acute heart failure. We expect a faster and more effective stabilization after acute cardial decompensation among the patients with the High-Flow-machine. The study should show whether the use of High-Flow-Therapy leads to a relevant improvement in terms of objective clinical parameters of heart failure like those for cardial-renal syndrome, changes in the nt-pro-BNP, weight loss, changes in the diameter of the inferior vena cava, in terms of the degree of shortness of breath and decompensation, and whether subjective clinical symptoms like dyspnea and quality of life differ between the two groups of patients. The investigators see the primary outcome of the study as the improvement of the cardial-renal syndrome as a sign of the more effective stabilisation compared to the standard therapy. Furthermore, the investigators expect a quicker decrease in serum creatinine and an improvement in the creatinine clearance through therapy with the High-Flow-Machine. In terms of secondary outcomes of the study, the investigators are interested in also comparing e.g., the duration of hospital stays, 90-day mortality, and rehospitalisation within three months. Here, the investigators expect a quicker improvement in the subjective shortness of breath of the patients who are treated using the Hifh-Flow-Machine. Moreover, we believe that along with the individual subjective improvements (quality of life survey), the patients will experience a quicker release from the hospital and in this way, lead to a healthcare economic improvement among patients with repeated hospitalizations who usually have chronic problems. It is also of great interest to us, whether the biomarker BNP is an appropriate parameter for determining the faster stabilization of the patient and whether the degree of improvement of subjective dyspnea is correlated with the time needed until the patient has been stabilised.

The primary objective is to determine the efficacy of a strategy of biomarker-guided therapy compared with usual care in high risk patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

The design of this study is a multi-center, prospective, single-arm clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Parachute percutaneous left ventricle partitioning system. The purpose of this trial is to use the Parachute percutaneous left ventricular partitioning system to isolate the malfunctioning portion of the left ventricle in patients with symptoms of heart failure due to ischemic heart disease and provide the data required to gain Chinese regulatory approval.

The study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of LCZ696 compared to enalapril on morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure (NYHA Class II - IV and EF =< 35%).