Active clinical trials for "Heart Failure"

The renin angiotensin system (RAS) plays an important physiological and pathophysiological role in the control of blood pressure and plasma volume. Inhibition of the RAS is useful in the treatment of hypertension, cardiac failure and in some patients with myocardial infarction. Several recent clinical trials with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) have shown that they also reduce the incidence of myocardial infarction, but the mechanisms underlying this anti-ischemic effect are poorly understood. ACEI reduce angiotensin II synthesis and prevent bradykinin degradation. Results from ongoing studies in the Cardiology Branch (Protocol 95-H-0099) designed to investigate the link between ACEI and the vascular endothelium indicate that ACEI improve both endothelial dysfunction and metabolic coronary vasodilation, an effect that is partially mediated by bradykinin. The current protocol is designed to investigate whether the beneficial effects of ACEI on endothelial function are also partly due to inhibition of angiotensin II. The recent development of selective angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonists allows us to specifically examine the effects of angiotensin II on vasomotor activity.

This pilot study is to assess the feasibility, preliminary utility and acceptance of a digital technology-based system for heart failure management.

Chronic heart failure (CHF) is a global pandemic which affects around 26 million people worldwide and develops in 10% of people over 70 years . According to the results of the EPOCHA-CHF study, CHF is detected in 7-10% of cases in the Russian Federation . Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in patients with both preserved (HFpEF) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) heart failure. The prognostic impact of AF on CHF is negative, including the significant increase in mortality and hospitalization. One of the common causes of decompensation of CHF is AF. The debut of AF in CHF is one of the markers of disease progression. Rapid development in interventional cardiology due to the invention of cardiac catheter technologies during the last decades provided a new option for non-pharmacological treatment of CHF. Nowadays the use of electrophysiological methods of treatment can significantly improve the prognosis of CHF. Pacemakers, cardiac resynchronization devices, and cardioverter defibrillators are the most commonly implanted devices in patients with CHF. In 2014, the European Society of Cardiology presented a report of the European Heart Rhythm Association on the use of new devices for CHF, including the Optimizer device for delivery of cardiac contractility modulation therapy (CCM) . It is worth noting that CCM is a new step in the CHF treatment. This device is of proven benefit to patients with symptomatic heart failure on optimal medical therapy who do not qualify for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Multiple studies of CCM show clinical improvement with this therapy, including metrics such as peak VO2, 6MW, and NYHA functional class. However, the vast majority of patients enrolled in these studies were patients in sinus rhythm. As the technology progressed and the need for the trial sensing led wanted, further experiences incorporated patients with AF. A new generation of devices (Optimizer Smart®), which does not require the implantation of an atrial electrode made it possible to implant CCM in patients with AF. The present trial demonstrates the results of a pilot study conducted in National Medical Research Center of Cardiology Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation which compares the efficacy of CCM in patients with AF and ischemic and non-ischemic CHF compared to patients who received only optimal drug therapy CHF

Evaluate the impact the application of the MESSI-AHF scale (a risk stratification scale specifically derived and validated in patients diagnosed with acute heart failure, AHF) in decision making (admission vs. discharge) by emergency physicians in emergency departments (ED) and its potential impact on on the short-term prognosis of patients with AHF.

This proof-of-concept, open-label non-randomized clinical trial was conducted at a tertiary care cardiac center in Karachi, Pakistan. Patients with HFrEF were prescribed Sacubitril/Valsartan and followed for 12 weeks for the assessment of safety and tolerability. Safety measures included incidence of hypotension, renal dysfunction, hyperkalemia, and angioedema

Dapagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i), increases natriuresis alone and synergistically when combined with loop diuretics in patients with AHF without increasing renin angiotensin- aldosterone activity. Thus, adding SGLT2i to the standard loop diuretic therapy might confer additional decongestive and natriuretic benefits while avoiding the adverse electrolyte abnormalities and neurohormonal activation associated with other diuretic combination. These potential benefits may help with improved clinical outcomes, but clinical evidence is still lacking.

Hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis CKD5 patients were randomly divided into Sacubitril/Valsartan and irbesartan treatment groups. Comparing the blood pressure, survival rates, the cardiac function, renal function,and adverse reactions of two groups, to evaluate whether the efficacy and safety of Sacubitril/Valsartan in the treatment of patients with CKD dialysis combined with heart failure is superior to that of irbesartan.

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Corheart 6 left ventricular assist system by conducting a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, target-value clinical trial.

Patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) will be randomized to either a moderate continuous (MCT, 50-60% of VO2peak) or interval training (IT, 80-90% of VO2peak) group for 6 weeks with 3 sessions per week, lasting for 20 minutes. An additional 10 minutes of resistance training will be performed in each group. Improvement of VO2peak and quality of life (KCCQ score) between the groups will be assessed.

Aim of the study is to assess the effects of abruptly increased afterload on left ventricular contractility and relaxation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF), patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFREF), and patients without HFPEF or HFREF.