Active clinical trials for "Heart Failure"

Exercise interventions alone or as a component of a comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation program for patients with heart failure (HFrEF and HFpEF) have already shown to reduce the risk of hospitalisations due to HF and improved exercise capacity and health-related quality of life. Two meta-analyses have confirmed the beneficial effects in cardiorespiratory fitness and quality of life. The effects of exercise training on systolic and diastolic function remain inconclusive. Due to the positive results of exercise training in HFpEF, cardiac rehabilitation is recommended (Class I, level A) to be integrated into the overall provision of HF care. However, none of these studies focused on concomitant PH in HFpEF. Exercise training in patients with pulmonary hypertension has already shown to improve exercise capacity, quality of life and peak oxygen consumption, which was confirmed by three meta-analyses and a Cochrane review. Though different diagnostic subgroups have already been enrolled in PH exercise training studies, they mainly included pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Data on combined PH and HFpEF is still lacking. As recently pointed out by Arena et al. there may thus be an exercise training volume/intensity which may be detrimental to the RV in patients with HF and concomitant PH. This study is sought to investigate whether a specialized training program is safe and tolerable and may improve exercise capacity, quality of life, hemodynamics, diastolic dysfunction and biomarkers in patients with PH and HFpEF.

To evaluate the role of exercise hemodynamic testing in the diagnostic workup for patients with dyspnea on exertion referred to the catheterization lab.

This study is a multicenter, prospective, randomized study to assess if cardiac dysfunction patients with LVEF <50% and the estimated ventricular pacing percentage >40% with LBBP have the non-inferior safety and efficacy than CRT on patients' cardiac function and prognosis

Heart failure (HF) is a chronic disease with weakened heart muscles or abnormal pressure within the heart chambers result in breathlessness, leg edema, or fatigue. A subclass of HF shows reduced heart muscle contractility, which is represented by the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Valsartan is an angiotensin II receptor blocker, a major drug class for heart failure. Sacubitril/valsartan is a combination of 2 drugs, classified as a new class of drug called angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI). Although these medications are both first-line treatment in HF with reduced LVEF, recent guidelines encourage the use of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with ongoing symptoms. After successful treatment, some patients experience recovery of LVEF. In these patients, otherwise called heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFiEF), it is not clear whether continued treatment with sacubitril/valsartan or valsartan is beneficial in terms of relapse of heart failure or worsening of LVEF. Therefore, the investigators aim to determine whether the treatment with sacubitril/valsartan versus valsartan differs in clinical outcomes after 1 year in HFiEF patients by observing the change in blood test markers of heart failure (N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide; NT-proBNP) and aggravation of HF defined as reduced LVEF, congestive symptoms, hospitalization or death from HF.

The primary aim of this observational registry is to evaluate the efficacy of CCM in patients with heart failure with mid-range or reduced EF and diagnosis of TTR amyloidosis. The efficacy will be evaluated in terms of composite of occurrence of heart failure-related hospitalizations and/or acute intravenous interventions (IVI) at 12-month follow up compared to those reported 12 months before CCM implantation. Among the secondary endpoints, clinical functional status, quality of life, drug changes and Echocardiographic parameters will be evaluated and compared from baseline to follow up.

This study is designed to be a clinical validation study to ready the CPM System for FDA 510(k) submission. This study will be conducted as a prospective non-randomized. The study is non-significant risk since the CPM Device is noninterventional and noninvasive. The study is primarily designed to validate the accuracy of the respiration rate and the changes in relative tidal volume. All participants will be fitted with both the CPM Device as well as reference devices (capnography and ECG). Participants will be randomized between 4 procedures (A-D) which will determine the order of 18 exercises. Each exercise has about 2 minutes of device recording and two minutes of rest. Each exercise contains two positions: sitting up for one minute and lying down for one minute. For some exercises, the participant will be instructed to breathe at a certain rate (assisted by a metronome). For other exercises, the participants will breathe at a normal rate but change how deep the are breathing. For exercise 18, all capnography reference devices will be removed, and an ECG reference device will be placed. After exercise 18, the participant will have all devices removed and the study visit will terminate. The participant will receive a safety follow-up call about 1 week after their visit.

This is a multinational non-interventional study based on newly collected data to assess demographics, disease, and treatment pattern of patients with chronic Heart Failure (HF) in a two-cohort design: one cohort will receive first prescription of empagliflozin as routine therapy for HF, the other cohort will receive HF therapy with drugs with another mechanism of action. Treatment of HF according to routine practice is determined by the physician independent of the participation of the patient in this non-interventional study.

Type 2 diabetes is a risk factor of heart failure and cognitive decline. Heart failure at its early stage is often silent. At present, primary prevention for heart failure is not available. Our aim is to identify diabetic patients at risk of heart failure in order to develop personalized preventive strategies. Type 2 diabetes is vascular and metabolic risk factor for cognitive decline though a direct lesional effect but also through an interaction with underlying neurodegenerative lesions. Our aim is to identify diabetic patients at risk of cognitive decline in order to develop personalized preventive strategies

The study focuses on the development of a new personalized approach to diagnostics and surgical treatment of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. The algorithm for selection of patients for certain type of cardiac surgery will be developed. The models for prediction of the risks and outcomes of cardiac surgery will be elaborated to reduce the rate of complications in the early and long-term postoperative period in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Imaging modalities, methods for assessement of structural and functional state of the myocardium, biochemistry testing, immunohistochemical examination, and myocardial biopsy studies will be used to achieve these goals.

The main purpose of the study is to evaluate the ability of the Tauropace to reduce major cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections through 12-months post-procedure following CIED in heart failure participants. The secondary endpoint is to prospectively characterize the performance of Tauropace in participants whose CIED system includes a transvenous RV defibrillation lead.