Active clinical trials for "Hepatitis A"

The study aims to assess the effectiveness of a model of hepatitis C screening and integrated care, targeting people who inject drugs (PWIDs) in Hai Phong, Vietnam. In a wider perspective, this model linked to mass screening through repeated Respondent Driven Sampling (RDS) surveys, to simplified treatment protocol, and to large community-based support to improve referral to care, retention in care, adherence to treatment and prevention of reinfection, may have the potential to eliminate HCV among PWIDs in this city.

To examine the safety and tolerability of IONIS-HBVRx administration to treatment-naive patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection

The primary objectives of this study are to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of switching to tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) versus continuing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in virologically suppressed adults with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection.

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (ABT-493/ABT-530) in non-cirrhotic chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype (GT)1 to GT6-infected Asian participants with or without human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection who are HCV treatment-naïve or treatment-experienced with interferon (IFN) with or without ribavirin (RBV), OR sofosbuvir with RBV with or without IFN.

This sponsor-open, investigator- and participant-blinded, multi-center study will assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of RO7020531 in healthy participants and in participants with chronic hepatitis B. Part I will be conducted in two portions: Single Ascending Dose (SAD) and Multiple Ascending Dose (MAD) which will include only healthy volunteers. Part II will commence after completion of the MAD portion of Part I and will include only Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB) participants.

This is a pilot feasibility study of a small randomized controlled trial (RCT)design to evaluate participation in a Cognitive Behavioral Coping Skills (CBCS) group intervention versus standard of care in patients with hepatitis C undergoing antiviral treatment. The primary objectives are to (1) examine effect size (ES) estimates of key outcomes to provide essential data to inform a larger efficacy trial, (2) determine whether clinically significant improvements occurred in any key outcomes, and (3) evaluate study feasibility and patient acceptability. Study findings will inform a larger efficacy study of the CBCS-HCV.

The REP 201 protocol is a small exploratory study assessing the antiviral effects and tolerability of REP 2139-Ca when used with a full course of pegylated interferon (48 weeks) in treatment naive patients or in patients already receiving entecavir and continuing entecavir with treatment.

This single-center, randomized, open-label, pilot study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 48 weeks of treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a alone versus in combination with ribavirin in participants with CHD.

The primary objectives of this study are to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of sofosbuvir /velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) fixed-dose combination (FDC) in participants with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) who have received a liver transplant.

Phase 1 of this study compared the effectiveness of 3 approved DAA (direct-acting antiviral) HCV treatment regimens to learn whether they worked equally well under real-world conditions. Phase 2 of this study began early 2017 with removal of 1 DAA regimen, limiting randomization to just 2 FDA approved DAA regimens. Patients receiving HCV therapy in community and academic clinics were offered the opportunity to consent to be randomly assigned to one of three (phase 1) or one of two (phase 2) regimens and observed for outcomes. Once randomized, all medical care, laboratory testing, and any disease or side effect management were assumed by usual care conditions, and patient-reported outcomes were collected outside clinic in keeping with pragmatic design principles.