Active clinical trials for "Hepatitis A"

This study is being done to determine the effectiveness of using a combination of two different drugs in preventing the transmission of HCV from a HCV positive donor to a HCV negative solid organ recipient.

In this study, individuals without hepatitis C infection who are on the kidney transplant waitlist will receive a kidney from a deceased donor with hepatitis C infection and will be treated for hepatitis C at the same time. Treatment will include glecaprevir 300 mg / pibrentasvir 120 mg (G-P) administered on-call to the operating room for the renal transplant procedure and continued for 2 weeks post-renal transplant.

This study is intended to evaluate if 12 or 24 weeks of treatment with GSK3228836 followed by up to 24 weeks of pegylated interferon (PegIFN) can increase the rate of hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) loss in participants on stable nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) therapy, and whether virologic response can be sustained once PegIFN treatment is discontinued. Participants will be randomized to receive GSK3228836 for 12 or 24 weeks followed by up to 24 weeks of PegIFN.

This is a study designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of New Molecular Entity (NME) combination therapies in Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB) participants with preserved liver function and without significant fibrosis/cirrhosis. The platform design allows comparison of multiple NME combination therapies against a common control, and introduction of additional treatment arms at later study time points. Each arm will consist of a screening phase (up to 8 weeks), treatment phase (up to 48 weeks) and post-treatment follow-up phase (48 weeks). The safety and efficacy will be monitored throughout the study.

This is an open-label, pilot trial to test the safety and efficacy of transplantation of livers from Hepatitis C seropositive non-viremic (HCV Ab+/NAT-) and HCV seropositive viremic (HCV Ab+/NAT+) donors to HCV seronegative recipients on the liver transplant waitlist. Treatment and prophylaxis will be administered, using a transmission-triggered approach for the first scenario (HCV Ab+/NAT- donors, arm 1) and a prophylaxis approach for the later scenario (HCV Ab+/NAT+ donors, arm 2).

In the globe, about 33% (2 billion) of population has ever been infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV), and about 5% (350-400 million) were chronical HBV infection. In areas with high prevalence of hepatitis B, up to 80% of primary liver cancers are associated with HBV infection. About 25% of chronic hepatitis B virus carrier (more than 1 million people per year) eventually die of end stage liver disease associated with HBV infection, such as liver failure associated with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. HBV replicates in the liver, which increases the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in HBV carriers. Studies have shown that the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in HBV carriers was 10-100 folds higher than that of non-carriers. Clinically, there are primarily two types of antiviral drugs: α-interferons (plain and pegylated ([PEG-IFN]α-2a or α-2b) interferons) and nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUC) including lamivudine (LAM), adefovir dipivoxil (ADV), entecavir (ETV), telbivudine (LDT), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate(TDF) and tenofovir alafenamide fumarate(TAF). With the development and application of antiviral drugs in recent years, the basic goal of maintain suppression against virus replication has been achieved, and HBsAg loss is considered as function cure of antiviral therapy. However, data from clinical studies showed a very low cure rate of current antiviral drugs and a natural HBsAg loss usually is less than 3%. The vast majority of clinical patients require long-term antiviral treatment and have difficulties in treatment stop. The AI data mining system innovated by the Holy Haid owns a ten-million-scaled database and utilizes dozens of HBV-associated targets to identify 100 drugs that are most closely to the targets among the 500 commercially available drugs. With the identified 100 drugs, Holy Haid (Ying-ying Li) and Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital (Lai Wei) conducted a cytological verification in mice, which indicated that the HD042 (Celecoxib) at 20uM concentration can inhibit HBV DNA, HBsAg and HBeAg by 70.87%, 88.52% and 87.55% respectively, without significant cytotoxicity. Based on this, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital (Lai Wei) retrospectively analyzed 1,114,661 patients admitted to 304 hospitals in 107 cities of 21 provinces and municipalities from January 1, 2019 to October 31, 2020 and identified 19,692 patients with the results of two HBsAg tests available and an interval of over 30 days. Among these, 3,359 patients had ever took HD042 (Celecoxib). Further analysis showed that these 3,359 patients, and screened out 383 patients who were diagnosed of hepatitis B and excluded from tumor with two HBsAg levels > 0.05IU/ml but ≤1500IU/ml. Among these, 110 patients were prescribed for more than 5 Celecoxib doses (about 30 days of treatment). Among the 110 patients, we screened out 27 patients on Celecoxib for 12 weeks whose HBsAg expression decreased by 59.2% after 12 weeks, including HBsAg clearance rate (i.e., HBsAg decreased to < 0.05IU/ mL) up to 18.5%. Celecoxib, a specific inhibitor of Cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2), has been widely used in clinical practice as an anti-inflammatory and analgesic drug. Studies have shown that Celecoxib improves NASH by inhibiting inflammatory responses. In addition, some studies have also shown that COX-2 is highly expressed in hepatitis B related hepatocellular carcinoma, resulting in cancerous tissue microangiogenesis. Cytological test found that Celecoxib, as a COX-2 specific inhibitor, can inhibit the growth of liver cancer cells by induced apoptosis and cell cycle inhibition, and have a even stronger effect on HBsAg positive liver cancer cells. However, the inhibitory effect of Celecoxib on the hepatitis B surface antigen in patients with chronic hepatitis B remained controversial. Therefore, this study is designed to investigate the safety and efficacy of Celecoxib in the hepatitis B surface antigen loss and reduction in nucleoside-treated patients with chronic hepatitis B.

BACKGROUND: Finite nucleos(t)ide analogue (Nuc) therapy was proposed as an alternative strategy in the management of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) but there remained not data from randomized controlled trials to clarify safety and efficacy of this treatment strategy. AIMS: The investigators aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of finite Nuc therapy versus continuous treatment in CHB patients without liver cirrhosis and also to identify factors that may predict therapeutic responses and clinical outcomes after withdrawal of Nuc treatment for CHB MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial conducted in Taiwan. Eligible patients are adults (age≥20 years) with CHB (chronic infection ≥ 6 months) who fulfill the APASL guideline 2016 to stop NA therapy. Those with cirrhosis, malignancy, organ transplant, autoimmune disorder, or serious underlying diseases including renal impairment were excluded. A total of 360 patients will be enrolled. Enrolled patients are randomly allocated with a 1:1 ratio to continue viral suppression with entecavir (0.5mg once daily) or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (300mg once daily) or stop the treatment. All patients will be followed up according to the protocol recommended by a panel of APASL experts. The primary analysis for study outcomes is scheduled at 3 years after randomization and the primary outcome is seroclearance of HBsAg. There will be interim analyses scheduled at one- and two-years following randomization of the first 200 patients, and also one-and two years following randomization of the planned 360 patients, to determine whether early termination of the trial may be justified by attainment of the efficacy endpoint (10% vs 1% of HBsAg seroclearance) or concerns of the safety outcomes (significant between-group difference in mortality, acute on chronic liver failure, or acute flares with hepatic decompensation).

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the study intervention based on hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels.

This phase I trial studies the side effects and the best dose of navitoclax when given together with sorafenib tosylate in treating patients with solid tumors that have returned (relapsed) or do not respond to treatment (refractory). Navitoclax and sorafenib tosylate may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth.

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the antiviral efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir DF; TDF) versus placebo in pediatric population (aged 2 to < 12 years at the time of enrollment) with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection.