Active clinical trials for "Hepatitis A"

This single arm study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of PEGASYS in patients with lamivudine resistant HBeAg negative chronic hepatitis B. Patients will receive PEGASYS 180 micrograms s.c. weekly for 48 weeks; following this, there will be a 48 week period of treatment-free follow-up. The anticipated time on study treatment is 3-12 months, and the target sample size is <100 individuals.

The objectives of this study are to compare in nucleoside treatment-naïve subjects, the efficacy and safety of clevudine 30 mg once daily versus adefovir 10 mg once daily, each as monotherapy, for 48 weeks and 96 weeks.

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and antiviral HBV activity of ACH-126,443 (beta-L-Fd4C) in the treatment of Subjects of Previous Achillion-Sponsored Phase 1 and 2 Studies in Chronic Hepatitis B Infection.

In the current era of highly effective direct acting antiviral (DAA) therapy, the remaining obstacles to elimination of chronic HCV infection are identification of the high-risk groups, linkage to continued care and prevention of re-infection. It is estimated that 70-80% of patients with chronic HCV are unaware of their infection. Besides, public health education is limited and most patients are not aware that the current standard-of-care is highly effective, well tolerated and no longer require weekly subcutaneous injections. From a survey in Hong Kong in 2014, among 234 newly diagnosed HCV patients, only 20% agreed to undergo treatment. There is no universal screening programme for chronic hepatitis C infection in Hong Kong. and known high-risk patients include people who inject drugs (PWID), persons with certain medical conditions including those on hemodialysis, HIV infected, those with prior transfusion or organ transplantation. In this study, the investigators plan to reach out to PWIDs, people with substance abuse or prison inmates to provide rapid point-of-care screening for chronic hepatitis C infection, and to provide linkage to care for those diagnosed with chronic hepatitis C.

This study is designed to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of single and multiple ascending doses in healthy volunteers (HV) and participants diagnosed with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

Grazoprevir/elbasvir combination therapy is highly effective in the treatment of genotype 1b chronic hepatitis C, and the drug-drug interaction with central immunosuppressant, such as tacrolimus, should be manageable. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and tolerability of grazoprevir/elbasvir combination therapy in treating genotype 1b chronic hepatitis C after liver or kidney transplantation.

An open-label, Phase 2, exploratory study to examine the safety and efficacy of inarigivir in non-cirrhotic, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative subjects with chronic HBV infection.

An evaluation of the impact of Elbasvir and Grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) HCV therapy on the heart risk and bone health of HCV mono-infected and HIV/HCV co-infected patients.

To address the need for more affordable hepatitis C virus (HCV) antivirals with high barriers to viral resistance and strategies to shorten the current treatment duration, the goal is to develop affordable therapeutic regimens to prevent HCV entry/spread and test the efficacy of those inhibitors for treating HCV infection. The investigators recently discovered that a major cholesterol uptake receptor is required for HCV entry into hepatocytes and that there is already an FDA-approved drug that inhibits cholesterol uptake by this receptor. Importantly the same drug also potently blocks HCV entry in human liver cells both in cell culture and in a small animal model. Further, looking back at people who were previously treated for HCV infection, the investigators found treatment response to be better (i.e. larger viral log reduction) in patients who happened to be taking ezetimibe (EZE). Hence, the objective of this study is to assess whether the FDA-approved drug (ezetimibe) is useful for the treatment of chronic HCV. The investigators predict that when administered as monotherapy ezetimibe will reduce HCV viremia perhaps allowing for viral clearance and that when included in combination treatment regimens that EZE will increase HCV decline resulting in faster viral clearance (i.e. shorter/cheaper direct-acting antiviral [DAA] therapy). To test these hypotheses, the investigators will execute the following aims: (1) Assess the efficacy of EZE monotherapy in chronically HCV infected and predict time to cure; (2) Assess the efficacy of EZE as an adjunct therapy in chronically HCV infected patients undergoing currently approved HCV DAA treatment.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, a leading cause of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver transplantation, affects approximately 170 million individuals worldwide. The prevention of HCV transmission and early intervention of HCV infection are urgently needed to reduce or halt the liver-related morbidity and mortality. Double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) has been with widespread use in clinical practice for several indications with plasma filters optimized for the respective elimination targets with excellent safety. By way of the plasma separator, the blood is separated into plasma and cell components. Separated plasma is then led into the plasma component separator where the pores of the plasma component separator further fractionate the plasma into large and small molecular components. The large molecular components, including pathogenic substances, is removed and discarded and the small molecular components, including proteins such as albumin and gamma-globulin, are returned to the patient and mixed with the cell components. After the initiation of pegylated interferon plus ribavirin (Peg-IFN+RBV) therapy, the rapid first phase relates to a significant reduction in virus production and the degradation of free virus particles, which is followed by a second much slower one reflecting the elimination and clearance of infected cells. In HCV patients, high baseline viral load at the initiation of therapy is considered to be a negative predictor for systemic vascular resistance (SVR) for HCV genotype 1 patients. Reduction of baseline viral load by means of therapeutic double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) may represent a plausible adjunct for improved antiviral therapy to reduce the virus load with the initiation of treatment in synergy with Peg-IFN and RBV combination therapy. Recently, several clinical studies in evaluating the therapeutic efficacy and safety of DFPP in conjunction with IFN-based therapy were conducted for treatment-naïve genotype 1 high viral load CHC patients, and CHC patients who underwent liver transplantation. These studies showed that patients with DFPP treatment had more favorable HCV early viral kinetics to those without DFPP treatment. Furthermore, all these studies showed excellent safety after DFPP treatment. Therefore, the investigators aimed to conduct a large-scaled randomized controlled trial to evaluate the overall response of DFPP for HCV genotype 1 patients with high viral load.