Active clinical trials for "Hepatitis A"

Rationale: The combination of azathioprine and prednisone is the first-line treatment for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), a chronic inflammatory disease of the liver. Complete biochemical remission (CR) is the first treatment goal in autoimmune hepatitis. CR is determined by AST and ALT and IgG within the reference range. CR is not reached in a substantial proportion of AIH patients: after one year 50%, after three years around 20% did not achieve CR. Without CR ongoing hepatitis leads to progression towards fibrosis and eventually (decompensated) cirrhosis. Not achieving CR is the most important risk factor for the need for liver transplantation or liver related death, independent of age and presence of cirrhosis. Tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) are frequently used to prevent rejection in kidney and liver transplant patients. In AIH patients with insufficient response or intolerance to first-line therapy in retrospective cohort studies with MMF 0-57% and with TAC 20-95% CR was reached. Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of TAC with MMF as a second line treatment for AIH. Proportion of patients with CR after 12 months of treatment will be the primary outcome parameter to determine effectivity. Study design: Randomized open-label two arm study. Patients will be randomized between treatment with TAC or MMF. Study population: Patients with AIH with an incomplete response (no CR) to first-line treatment are eligible for this study. Intervention: In the TAC group baseline treatment will be replaced by tacrolimus. In the MMF group baseline treatment will be replaced by MMF. The current dose of prednisolone, or at least 5 mg daily, will be continued in both arms. After achieving CR prednisolone will be tapered according to protocol. Main study parameters/endpoints: Difference in proportion of patients with CR at 12 months (normalization of ALT, AST and IgG) between the TAC and MMF treatment group. Secondary parameters: Safety and tolerability of TAC and MMF treatments Difference in proportion of patients with CR at 6 months (normalization of ALT, AST and IgG) between the TAC and MMF treatment group. Difference in ALT, AST and IgG at 6 and 12 months versus baseline Difference in fibrogenesis and fibrosis parameters between groups and before and after treatment Difference in quality of life between groups and before and after treatment

There are about 400 million chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection patients worldwide, posing a serious threat to global public health security. In China, HBV infection occured mainly in the perinatal period or infants, and about 10% of patients in the immune tolerance stage spontaneously transit to the immune clearance stage every year and become HBeAg-negative chronic HBV infection, resulting in a significant increase in the number of inactive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. In recent years, different guidelines have not reached consensus on the need to initiate antiviral therapy for inactive CHB patients: In the guidelines of Asian Pacific Association for The Study of Liver(APASL)-2015 and American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases(AASLD)-2018, antiviral therapy is generally not recommended for this group of patients, and regular outpatient follow-up is recommended. Guideline of European Association for the Study of the Liver(EASL)-2017 suggests that people with a family history of cirrhosis and liver cancer at this stage could be treated with antiviral therapy even if they did not meet the indications of antiviral therapy. According to Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B (version 2019) of China, antiviral therapy is still recommended for some patients with inactive HBsAg carrier status who are HBV DNA positive and meet the treatment indications. Studies have shown that some patients in immune tolerance stage may enter the immune clearance stage and have hepatitis flare. Patients of inactive CHB have the potential to develop HBeAg-negative CHB, and studies of long-term follow-up in this population have indicated the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. With the popularization of the concept of functional cure for chronic hepatitis B, more and more people with inactive CHB have a strong desire for treatment. In recent years, several studies have demonstrated that Pegylated-interferon therapy can achieve high functional cure rate in patients with inactive CHB. The purpose of this study is to establish a national multi-center, prospective real world study to compare the efficacy of different antiviral treatment regimens for patients with inactive CHB and seek for the factors of functional cure.

The goals of this clinical study are to compare the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of study drug, tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), versus placebo in teens and children with CHB and to learn more about the dosing levels in children.

This study is to investigate the clinical efficacy of three types of nucleotide/nucleoside analogues in treatment of HBV-related acute-on-chronic liver failure.

The study aims to demonstrate that whether treatment of nucleoside （acid）analogues (NAs) plus pegylated interferon (Peg IFN) α-2b for those NAs treated, low level of HBsAg, hepatitis B related compensatory cirrhosis patients will result in higher HBsAg clearance rate and reduce the risk of liver cancer. The investigators plan to enroll about 84 hepatitis B related compensatory cirrhosis patients, who have received NAs treatment more than 1 year with the level of HBsAg <1000IU/ml. These participants will be devided into 2 groups. Group A will receive the treatment of NAs plus Peg IFNα-2b. Group B will be treated with NAs as before enrollment. The participants in both groups will be followed up for 96 weeks. The primary endpoint is to compare the clearance rate of HBsAg between two groups. The secondary endpoint includes: (1) comparing the incidence of liver cancer during the 96 weeks follow-up, (2) comparing adverse side effects between the 2 groups. (3) comparing the virological and biochemical responses between the 2 groups.

Patients with chronic hepatitis B should maximize the inhibition of HBV replication, which could reduce the incidence of liver cancer and liver disease-related complications. However, after 96 weeks of treatment with the first-line drugs, entecavir or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, a certain proportion of patients still had low levels of HBV replication. Tenofovir alafenamide fumarate is a newly marketed anti-hepatitis B drug that is currently considered to be non-inferior to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and safer bone and renal effects. Therefore, this research was put forward to investigate whether tenofovir alafenamide fumarate replacement for hepatitis B had a higher virological response rate and safety in patients with low levels of virus after 48 weeks of treatment with entecavir and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.

To date, antiviral treatment is not recommended for chronic hepatitis B patients with a normal ALT level and low viremia. The strategy is to closely monitor the patients. However, evidence suggests that these group are at risk of gradual disease progression and development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Peginterferon eliminates the hepatitis B virus through immune regulation and induction of antiviral protein expression. For patients with low viral load, the clinical cure rate is potentially promising. In this study, we aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of peginterferon alpha-2b therapy in selected chronic hepatitis B patients with normal ALT level and low viremia. It is expected to obtain a satisfactory curative effect. Peginterferon is a marketed drug available in Chinese clinics with indications of anti-hepatitis B virus.

Prospective, single center, open label, randomized controlled trial to determine the feasibility of conducting a future study with respect to patient recruitment, digoxin administration and dose adjustment. The study intervention will be intravenous digoxin (renal-based dosing for maximum of 28 days) versus no digoxin in an open-label 1:1 randomized allocation of patients with severe acute alcohol associated hepatitis.

This is a Phase II study in patients with advanced liver cancer (hepatocellular carcinoma) as a result of hepatitis B and/or C infection. Participants will be dosed with either MTL-CEBPA (an experimental treatment) and sorafenib or sorafenib alone. The MTL-CEBPA is administered once every 3 weeks via intravenous infusion. Sorafenib is taken orally from Day 8 for the combination group or Day 1 for the sorafenib alone group at a dose of 400 mg twice a day. Participants will receive 3 week cycles of treatment until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent or death occurs. The combination of MTL-CEBA and sorafenib combination of treatment was tested in a previous Phase I study (OUTREACH) which showed anti-tumour activity along with a good safety and toxicity profile.

A subtype of Alcoholic hepatitis (AH), named severe alcoholic hepatitis (SAH) is associated with high short-term mortality (J Hepatol, 2019) The only SAH treatment option - corticosteroids (CS) - are often contraindicated or ineffective (STOPAH Trial) New treatment modalities for remaining patients are much needed Fecal microbial transplantation (FMT) is one of the promising therapies Investigators aimed to see if FMT improves survival in patients admitted with SAH, not responding to-, or non-eligible for CS.