Active clinical trials for "Hepatitis A"

The primary objectives of this study are to assess the safety of ABT-450/r/ABT-267 with and without ABT-333 coadministered with and without ribavirin (RBV) for 12 and 24 weeks in HCV GT1- or 4-infected participants with HIV-1 coinfection and to evaluate the percentage of subjects achieving HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) < lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) 12 weeks following treatment.

The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced adults with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection.

This adaptive design study will evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and effect on hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA levels of multiple doses of MK-8876 in participants with HCV infection. The study will consist of 4 parts evaluating participants infected with specific hepatitis C virus genotypes and up to 10 panels allowing for additional participants to enroll in each panel as specified in the study analysis. The hypothesis evaluated in the study is that a ≥2.5 log IU/mL reduction in HCV RNA from Baseline will accompany multiple dose administration of MK-8876 in participants with HCV infection.

This is a multi-site, open-label trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of 100 mg of grazoprevir (MK-5172) used in combination with or without 50 mg of elbasvir (MK-8742) and/or ribavirin (RBV) in treating non-cirrhotic treatment-naïve participants with chronic genotype (GT) 2, 4, 5, and 6 hepatitis C infection. In Part A there is no randomization or stratification; all GT2 participants will be assigned to arm A1. In Part B, all GT2 participants will be assigned to Arm B1 and all participants with GT4, GT5 and GT6 will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either Arm 3 or Arm 4 with stratification by genotype.

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether HB-Vac Activated-DCs Combined With Peg-IFN or NAs has more efficacy than Peg-IFN or NAs alone in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B patients

Study to assess the antiviral efficacy, pharmacokinetics and tolerability of BILN 2061 ZW in a polyethyleneglycol 400 (PEG 400: ethanol) drinking solution given for two days bid in patients with chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection.

The purpose of the study is to evaluate effect of steady-state (when the amount of drug administered (in a given time period is equal to the amount of drug eliminated in that same period) of simeprevir and daclatasvir on the steady-state pharmacokinetics (what a medication does to the body) of cyclosporine (applicable to Part 1 only) and tacrolimus when administered as a combinational regimen in post-orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) participants with recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1b infection and effectiveness of a 24-week treatment regimen containing simeprevir, daclatasvir, and ribavirin (RBV) with respect to the proportion of HCV genotype 1b infected post-OLT participants achieving sustained virologic response 12 weeks after end of treatment.

This randomized, controlled, parallel group, open-label multicenter study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combination of pegylated interferon alfa-2A (Pegasys) plus lamivudine or entecavir compared with an untreated control group in participants with HBeAg positive CHB in the immune tolerant phase. NOTE: STUDY RECRUITMENT HAS BEEN TERMINATED

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection provokes thousands of deaths every year all over the world, being the major cause of progressive liver disease, primary hepatic cancer and liver transplantation. Today, a "curative" therapy is available, that can eradicate the viral infection and determine the regression of liver fibrosis, also in cirrhotic subjects. The current standard-of-care for HCV chronic infection is combination therapy with peginterferon (P-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV). However, this treatment is not only expensive but determines several side effects, that can reduce drug tolerance and hence, patient adherence to therapy. There are two types of available P-IFN on the market: P-IFN alfa-2a (Pegasys®, F.Hoffmann-La Roche) administered at a flat-dose of 180 mcg/week and P-IFN alfa-2b (PegIntron®, Schering-Plough) given at a weight-based dose of 50 to 150 mcg/week. Since only a single amino acid differentiates these types of IFN, administration strategies depend on their pegilation with molecules of 40 or 12kDa, respectively, that accounts for differences in the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug-profile and influences probably also bioactivity. No comparative data are available on the benefits and costs of the licensed Peg-IFN plus RBV for the treatment of HCV infection in the real clinical practice, even if, the benefit and favourable cost-efficacy of this antiviral therapy is well established and of large consensus. Recently, the first randomized controlled mega-trial to compare antiviral therapeutic efficacy in naïve patients with HCV-genotype 1 infection during different regimens of P-IFN alfa-2b (at low and standard-dose) and P-IFN alfa-2a plus RBV, has been published, confirming a similar efficacy, of around 40%, obtained with the three schedules evaluated. In Italy, a regional program on the Surveillance and Control of HCV Infection, set up by the Regional Health Councillorship, has led to the development of a clinical and epidemiological observatory, constituted by a network of liver tertiary centres (Hepatological Cooperative Network of Veneto, HepCoVe). This collaborative group is connected on-line by a common database that, since 2003, has prospectively collected data on a cohort of more than 3000 patients with chronic HCV infection and, among them, of 506 naïve subjects that consecutively underwent combination therapy with P-IFN alfa-2a or alfa-2b plus RBV. The aim of this study was to rationalize and improve the social regional health program on antiviral treatment of chronic hepatitis C by assessing the different schedules utilization of P-IFN plus RBV as well as the respective therapeutic effectiveness, safety and costs in the real clinical practice (Project A).

This is an open study to evaluate the efficacy, safety of clevudine monotherapy or adefovir and clevudine combination in patients with chronic hepatitis B.