Active clinical trials for "Hepatitis B, Chronic"

Entecavir has been one of the option for treatment of lamivudine resistant chronic hepatitis B (CHB). In case of entecavir resistance, adefovir could be used. However, sequential monotherapy may result in multidrug resistance. It is thought that adefovir and lamivudine combination therapy reduce the risk of adefovir resistance, thereby continued therapy will lead to suppression of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA to be undetectable in patients with entecavir resistance. This study aim to evaluate the efficacy of adefovir and lamivudine combination therapy in CHB patients with entecavir resistance.

Treatment with a nucleoside analogue and subsequent viral decline has shown to partially restore immune hyporesponsiveness in chronic hepatitis B patients. Recent pilot studies investigating whether the effect of lowering viral load with nucleoside analogue therapy prior to the initiation of peginterferon results in higher sustained off-treatment responses showed contradictory findings. The aim of this study is to investigate sustained off-treatment response to peginterferon alfa-2b in chronic HBeAg-positive hepatitis B patients who are pretreated with nucleos(t)ide analogues, thereby lowering viral load

The primary objectives of this study are to evaluate the safety and efficacy of GS-4774 in adults with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) viral infection who have been virally suppressed with an oral antiviral (OAV) medication.

The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced adults with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection.

This randomized, controlled, parallel group, open-label multicenter study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combination of pegylated interferon alfa-2A (Pegasys) plus lamivudine or entecavir compared with an untreated control group in participants with HBeAg positive CHB in the immune tolerant phase. NOTE: STUDY RECRUITMENT HAS BEEN TERMINATED

This study is an open label, dose escalation study using the classical 3+3 design to determine the MTD of HB-110 and assess the safety, immunogenicity and efficacy of HB-110 DNA therapeutic vaccine administered by Electroporation in combination with Entecavir in chronic hepatitis B patients.

Entecavir, a potent antiviral agent, has been widely used for treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B patients. However, about 20% of patients showed partial virologic response after 2 year of entecavir therapy (33% in HBeAg positive, 10% in HBeAg negative patients). Tenofovir is a nucleotide analogue with more potent antiviral activity. In addition, there is no cross resistance between the two drugs. Therefore it is assumed that tenofovir would be effective in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B patients who shows partial virologic response (detectable HBV DNA by real time PCR after 12 months of treatment) despite treatment with entecavir. In this study, we will compare the efficacy of switching to tenofovir with continuing entecavir in patients who shows partial virologic response to entecavir.

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether HB-Vac Activated-DCs Combined With Peg-IFN or NAs has more efficacy than Peg-IFN or NAs alone in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B patients

To evaluate therapeutic efficacy and predicting factors of entecavir for treating patients with acute on chronic hepatitis B liver failure (ACHBLF). A total of 108 patients with ACHBLF were allocated into either a treatment group (ETV group, n=53) or a control group (n=55). The HBV DNA level, liver function and survival condition of the patients were observed for 48 weeks after enrollment. The factors possibly related to entecavir treatment efficacy were also identified.

This is an open study to evaluate the efficacy, safety of clevudine monotherapy or adefovir and clevudine combination in patients with chronic hepatitis B.