Active clinical trials for "Hepatitis B, Chronic"

HBsAg Loss/Seroconversion is uncommon in Low replicative chronic HBV infection patients. The purpose of this study is to investigate the ability of peginterferon alpha to achieve HBsAg loss/seroconversion therapy in Low replicative chronic HBV infection patients with Low Level HBsAg.

Efficacy and Safety of ibrutinib in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and other indolent B-cell lymphomas who are chronic hepatitis B virus carriers or occult hepatitis B virus carriers

The study objective is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of different doses of Metacavir Enteric-coated Capsules in treatment of chronic hepatitis B,as well as to find an appropriate clinical dosage by comparing the effect of different doses of treatment,in order to provide references of clinical trial of the next phase.

This is a nonrandomized, open-label, no-control, dose-escalation Phase 1b trial in 18 patients with chronic HBV infection to determine the safety, preliminary efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of QL-007 after administration over 28 days of multiple oral doses in a fasted state at the following planned dose levels: 200 mg/day (100 mg two times a day (BID)), 400 mg/day (200 mg BID), then 600 mg once daily (QD), with 6 patients for each cohort.

Chronic Hepatitis B is the most common cause of chronic viral liver disease worldwide afflicting 350 million persons, leading to significant morbidity and mortality due to liver disease and HCC in 20-40% of infected persons. With the advent of nucleoside analogues, this rescued patients with significant risk of disease progression, but in most circumstances, therapy was needed long term as HBsAg seroclearance was an uncommon occurrence, and stopping therapy was associated with relapse of disease and hepatitis B flares. The use of pegylated interferons showed increased HBeAg seroconversion and HBsAg seroclearance rates compared to nucleoside analogues , however combination nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy has been quite disappointing. However a recent showed that the combination of telbivudine and tenofovir in a response guided therapy design, had a remarkable 6% HBsAg seroclearance at week 52 in patients. Such results require further confirmation. There is currently an unmet need for the large number of patients on long term nucleoside analogue therapy who have not achieved HBeAg seroconversion or HBsAg seroclearance. Such patients are seeking alternatives to long term therapy hence an exploration of other therapeutic strategies is attractive. An additional benefit of telbivudine has been the surprising improvement in renal function and this study seeks to examine whether this can improve the renal impairment that may be seen with tenofovir. Our study proposes to examine if the combination of tenofovir and telbivudine can improve endpoints. Patients fulfilling inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomized to tenofovir or tenofovir and telbivudine (1:1 ratio). The primary endpoint will be a qHBsAg reduction of >1log at week 96, which may predict future HBsAg seroclearance, which is also a secondary endpoint. An additional primary endpoint is increase in eGFR in the combination arm compared to the monotherapy arm. The study aims to enroll 146 patients randomized 1:1 ratio (73:73) patients. Multivariate analysis will be performed of baseline and on-treatment factors that predict the primary outcome.

This study evaluates generic emtricitabine(FTC) in Chinese naive chronic hepatitis B patients. Patients were divided into 2 groups: HBeAg positive Chronic hepatitis B(CHB)group and HBeAg negative Chronic hepatitis B(CHB)group.

This study evaluates generic emtricitabine(FTC) in Chinese naive children chronic hepatitis B patients. Single group of child patients were enrolled, which include HBeAg positive and negative Chronic hepatitis B(CHB)group.

This study evaluates generic emtricitabine(FTC) efficacy and safety in Chinese naive pregnant chronic hepatitis B patients. Single group patients were enrolled to receive emtricitabine till 48 weeks after delivery.

This is a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase IIa study to evaluate safety and efficacy of TQ-A3334 combined with entecavir in the untreated or HBV DNA negative subjects with Chronic Hepatitis B.

Both tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) are potent antiviral agents for hepatitis B virus (HBV) and recommended by the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease (AASLD) as well as the European Association for the Study of Liver (EASL) guidelines for the treatment of nucleos(t)ide therapy induced HBV resistance. However, it is not clear if chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with nucleos(t)ide treatment experience without genotypic mutations would be benefit from TAF therapy. Previous studies have observed that suboptimal response (SOR) following antiviral therapy with nucleos(t)ide treatment is associated with an increased risk of subsequent treatment failure and viral resistance. It remains unclear whether switching to TAF is a reasonable approach in patients with SOR to second-line antivirals Lamivudine (LAM)/ Telbivudine (LdT)/ Adefovir Dipivoxil (ADV) and its combinations with other second-line antivirals for 24 weeks, or SOR to the first-line antiviral Entecavir (ETV) or any antiviral combinations containing ETV for 48 weeks. This study is aimed to determine how the aforementioned patients with SOR to nucleos(t)ide treatment respond to TAF monotherapy. The investigator's study will provide evidence base for therapy selection in SOR patients, especially in China where the majority of patients with CHB are treated with nucleos(t)ide therapy.