Active clinical trials for "Hepatitis B, Chronic"

A multi-center, randomized, open-label, group controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of T101 combined with nucleoside (acid) analogues in chronic hepatitis B patients.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) leads to life-threatening disease like liver failure and liver cancer. For most, a cure is unattainable as current HBV antiviral therapy (using nucleoside analogues) are not able to clear the virus from their liver. While HBV treatments are typically administered alone (monotherapy), this study will explore the use of Ribavirin in combination with standard therapy to enhance current treatment regimens. Ribavirin is commonly used to treat Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) but there is evidence that Ribavirin also induces immune effects that are beneficial in HBV treatment. The aim of this study is to determine whether combination of Ribavirin and a nucleoside analog is more effective compared to nucleoside analog treatment alone. Enrolled patients will be followed for treatment response according to standard clinical and virological tests, as well as immune response to HBV. Our ultimate goal is to find a more effective treatment and improve health outcomes for persons living with HBV.

This is a randomized, open-label, positive-control, dose-escalation Phase 1b trial in 60 patients with chronic HBV infection to determine the safety, preliminary efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of QL-007 after administration over 28 days of multiple oral doses in a fasted state at the following planned dose levels: 200, 400, and then 600 mg.

Pilot study to assess the antiviral activity and safety of Besifovir dipivoxil 150mg and L-carnitine 660mg compared to Tenofovir Alafenamide 25mg in chronic hepatitis B patients with Nonalcoholic fatty liver

In Taiwan, 15% of general population had hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, HBV is the leading cause of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in Taiwan. After entering immune clearance, 10-30% of patients of chronic HBV develop acute exacerbation (AE) , some are mild but some developed hepatic decompensation or even death. Previous study found that early use of lamivudine before bilirubin level is above 20 mg/dl can improve survival in chornic HBV with severe AE. From the study from Hongkong, lamivudine was found to have better survival than entecavir in chronic HBV with severe AE. Recent study from India found that tenofovir is able to improve survival in chronic HBV with severe AE. The aim of this study is to compare the effect of lamivudine and tenofovir for chronic HBV with severe AE. The study aims to enroll 120 patients with chronic HBV defined as persistence of HBsAg for more than 6 months. Severe AE was defined as ALT > 400 U/L, prolongation of prothrombin time > 3 seconds, bilirubin > 2 mg/dl. Patients with hepatitis A, C, D or HIV infection, drug or alcoholic liver disease, hepatocellular carcinoma, under immuno-suppressive agents use, or previous use of anti-HBV agents are excluded. All enrolled patients are randomized into group A who received tenofovir 300 mg qd for 3 years and group B who received lamivuidne 100 mg qd for 6 months, followed by tenofovir 300mg qd for 30 months. Mortality rate and virological, biochemical and serological response were evaluated at 1,2,4,48,96 and 144 weeks. The values are expressed as mean + SD. Categorical variables were analyzed with Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test as appropriate and continuous variables were analyzed by Mann-Whitney test. Logistic regression test was applied to analyze the independent association of various variables with outcome. A p value < 0.05 was regarded as significant.

Antiviral treatment on Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB) patients with liver cirrhosis is compulsory and effective. Telbivudine, which is superior to lamivudine in the treatment of CHB,is considered to be appropriate for the antiviral treatment on CHB patients with liver cirrhosis.

The investigators will investigate the clinicopathological features of chronic hepatitis B patients with severe exacerbation selected by uniform criteria, and treated with early introduction or reintroduction of corticosteroids and anti-allergenic therapy, in order to clarify the benefits and limitations of the effects of corticosteroids and anti-allergenic therapy for amelioration of clinically severe exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B. The investigators also observe the immune index in the change before and after the treatment, in order to searching for some prognostic index.

Switching to Entecavir(ETV) plus Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate(TDF) combination will result in faster and greater antiviral activity and lower rates of resistance emergence over maintaining Lamivudine(LAM)/Telbivudine(LdT)+Adefovir(ADV) combination in partial responders to LAM/LdT+ADV rescue therapy. Earlier switching to combination with the most potent regimen will be more effective to achieve virologic response(VR) and prevent further resistance emergence. All subjects will orally take assigned drugs once daily for 48 weeks. All subjects will be assessed at baseline and every three months thereafter. Evaluations at each visit will include vital signs, physical examinations, laboratory tests, HBV DNA levels and adverse events. At baseline and every six months thereafter, serum will be assayed for HBV serology. Genotypic analysis will be performed at baseline and 48 weeks.

Oral antiviral drugs which can be given to patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B include Lamivudine, Clevudine, Adefovir, Telbivudine, Entecavir and Tenofovir. 2009 American Association for the Study of Liver Disease (AASLD) Treatment Guidelines and 2009 European association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) Treatment Guidelines recommend the administration of Entecavir or Tenofovir with high potency and low resistance. Lamivudine has low antiviral potency and high incidence of mutation in long-term administration compared to Entecavir or Tenofovir. Clevudine causes the elevated creatinine kinase (CK), side effects including myositis/myopathy and much mutation in the long-term administration. Globe study demonstrated Telbivudine had more excellent antiviral potency than Lamivudine, which was also comparable to or higher than Entecavir or Tenofovir. Nevertheless, the choice of treatment drugs can be limited due to the mutation rate of 25% for 2 years. However, the analysis of Globe study results showed that 2-year treatment progress was very good in patient who showed virologic response at 24 weeks after the initiation of treatment and that high antiviral potency and low mutation rate were observed when the Telbivudine roadmap strategy (in the event that virologic response is shown at 24 weeks, telbivudine monotherapy is maintained and in the event that virologic response is not shown, tenofovir add-on therapy is done) recently implemented and announced in 2011 Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) was applied. However, the study was single arm study, which restricted the comparison between Entecavir and Tenofovir monotherapy groups. Therefore, this study intends to compare the anti-viral effect and mutation rate between Entecavir 0.5mg monotherapy group and Telbivudine roadmap strategy group in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B through a randomized study.

The purpose of the study is to investigate the long-term safety and the antiviral activity of the optimal doses of LB80380 for additional 48 weeks in treatment-naive patients with chronic hepatitis B infection compared to entecavir 0.5 mg.