Active clinical trials for "Hepatitis"

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of triple therapy of AbbVie adults with chronic hepatitis C virus ("HCV"), who have not responded to prior treatment with protease inhibitors. The "Triple therapy" of AbbVie attacks various sites of the viral genome, thus increasing the potential efficacy of the treatment, especially for patients who have failed PI treatment.

A Phase 1, First-in-Human, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetic Profiles of Single Ascending and Multiple Oral Doses of MB-110 in Healthy Volunteers and to Evaluate the Antiviral Activity of MB-110 in Hepatitis C Virus Infected Subjects

Patients with chronic hepatitis C that are under opiate substitution therapy are likely to have psychiatric comorbidities such as depression; hence an Interferon based therapy is contraindicated. Additionally many of these patients have a borderline compliance, which makes it impossible to treat them at specialized hepatological centers. An ideal opportunity to treat this patients is treatment with DAAs (Direct Acting Antiviral) which can be administered daily together with the opiate substitution therapy at a low threshold facility.

This is a nonrandomized, open-label, no-control, dose-escalation Phase 1b trial in 18 patients with chronic HBV infection to determine the safety, preliminary efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of QL-007 after administration over 28 days of multiple oral doses in a fasted state at the following planned dose levels: 200 mg/day (100 mg two times a day (BID)), 400 mg/day (200 mg BID), then 600 mg once daily (QD), with 6 patients for each cohort.

Chronic Hepatitis B is the most common cause of chronic viral liver disease worldwide afflicting 350 million persons, leading to significant morbidity and mortality due to liver disease and HCC in 20-40% of infected persons. With the advent of nucleoside analogues, this rescued patients with significant risk of disease progression, but in most circumstances, therapy was needed long term as HBsAg seroclearance was an uncommon occurrence, and stopping therapy was associated with relapse of disease and hepatitis B flares. The use of pegylated interferons showed increased HBeAg seroconversion and HBsAg seroclearance rates compared to nucleoside analogues , however combination nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy has been quite disappointing. However a recent showed that the combination of telbivudine and tenofovir in a response guided therapy design, had a remarkable 6% HBsAg seroclearance at week 52 in patients. Such results require further confirmation. There is currently an unmet need for the large number of patients on long term nucleoside analogue therapy who have not achieved HBeAg seroconversion or HBsAg seroclearance. Such patients are seeking alternatives to long term therapy hence an exploration of other therapeutic strategies is attractive. An additional benefit of telbivudine has been the surprising improvement in renal function and this study seeks to examine whether this can improve the renal impairment that may be seen with tenofovir. Our study proposes to examine if the combination of tenofovir and telbivudine can improve endpoints. Patients fulfilling inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomized to tenofovir or tenofovir and telbivudine (1:1 ratio). The primary endpoint will be a qHBsAg reduction of >1log at week 96, which may predict future HBsAg seroclearance, which is also a secondary endpoint. An additional primary endpoint is increase in eGFR in the combination arm compared to the monotherapy arm. The study aims to enroll 146 patients randomized 1:1 ratio (73:73) patients. Multivariate analysis will be performed of baseline and on-treatment factors that predict the primary outcome.

The purpose of this study is to compare efficacy and safety of continuing Lamivudine plus Adefovir or Adefovir versus switching to Entecavir plus Adefovir in patients with LAM-resistant chronic hepatitis B who have suboptimal response to Lamivudine plus Adefovir or Adefovir

This Registry will enroll adolescent and pediatric participants who received at least one Gilead Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) direct acting antiviral (DAA) while participating in a Gilead-sponsored chronic hepatitis C clinical trial. The primary objective of this Registry is to determine the long-term safety of anti-HCV regimens in the pediatric population. Secondary objectives of this Registry are to determine whether subsequent detection of HCV RNA in participants who relapse following sustained virologic response (SVR) represents the re-emergence of pre-existing virus, the development of resistance mutations, or whether it is due to re-infection, and to characterize resistance mutations and the persistence of resistance mutations in pediatric participants who did not achieve SVR. Once enrolled, participants will be followed for up to 5 years.

Although the incidence of Hepatitis B has been decreased a lot recently years, there are still quite a few chronic hepatitis B patients in China. The anti-virus drugs of western medicine such as Entecavir and Tenofovir have been proved effective on decreasing the serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) level, on the other hand, Chinese materia medica showed effective on TCM syndromes of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) such as hypochondriac pain, jaundice and abdominal mass. Besides, the hepatic fibrosis could be delayed after the appropriate treatment of TCM. This study is a multicenter, randomized, open label, parallel group clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of two different traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) herbal treatment on chronic hepatitis B.

Rationale: Current standard therapy of autoimmune hepatitis consists of a combination of prednisolone and azathioprine. However, a significant proportion of patients does not respond to, or is intolerant for, azathioprine. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has surpassed azathioprine as therapy to prevent organ transplant rejection and is sometimes used as an alternative option for autoimmune hepatitis. Several case series and one prospective study have documented the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil as induction therapy for autoimmune hepatitis. Robust evidence from a formal randomized clinical trial is lacking. Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil as induction therapy in patients with treatment naive autoimmune hepatitis. Study design: Multicenter, randomised, open-label intervention study Study population: Patients with newly diagnosed autoimmune hepatitis who are in need of induction therapy according to current guidelines. Intervention: The intervention group will receive oral mycophenolate mofetil for 24 weeks. The control group will be treated with azathioprine for 24 weeks. Both groups will be treated with steroid induction which will closely follow the schedule from the recent Clinical Practice Guidelines by the European Association for Study of the Liver (EASL). Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome is the proportion of patients in biochemical remission, defined as normalization of serum alanine transaminase (ALT) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels after 24 weeks of treatment, per treatment group. Secondary endpoints include safety and tolerability of mycophenolate mofetil, time to remission, changes in Model For End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) -score (and its components bilirubin, INR, creatinine), albumin, pseudocholinesterase and N-terminal procollagen-III-peptide, ELF (Enhanced Liver Fibrosis) -score and aspects of quality of life.

Efficacy and Safety of ibrutinib in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and other indolent B-cell lymphomas who are chronic hepatitis B virus carriers or occult hepatitis B virus carriers