Active clinical trials for "Hepatitis"

Objectives: 1) To evaluate la proportion of hepatitic C virus (HCV)-monoinfected patients who show sustained virologic response (SVR) to treatment including direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) in the clinical practice in clinical units that treat infectious diseases and 2) to determine the frequency of adverse events, including those that are severe and/or cause treatment interruption, in DAA-based therapy in this setting. Design: Multicentric, prospective post-authorised cohort study. Setting: Hospitals of the Hepatitis Study Group (GEHEP) of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology (SEIMC). Study population: HCV-monoinfected patients that initiate DAA-based treatment outside clinical trials. Variables: The primary efficacy outcome variable is the proportion of patients who reach undetectable HCV-RNA 12 weeks after the scheduled end of therapy (SVR12). The primary safety outcome variable is the percentage of subjects who discontinue therapy due to adverse events. Statistical analysis: A descriptive study will be performed, as well as a double sensibility analysis of the frequency of SVR12 using both an intention-to-treat and an on-treatment approach. Those variables that are associated with SVR12 with a p-value <0.2 will be included in a logistic regression analysis in which SVR12 will be the dependent variable.

The study aims to collect information on the current treatment patterns for Hepatitis C in participating countries. There is also a focus on patients receiving a daclatasvir-containing treatment regimen who will be followed prospectively for 12 months after treatment initiation to collect real-world data on effectiveness and safety of the treatment. Additional analysis will differentiate between selected subpopulations.

The purpose of this follow-up study is to evaluate the five-year immune persistence of one injection of inactivated and attenuated alive hepatitis A vaccine in healthy children.

Since success of the combination therapy with PEG-IFN and RBV is contingent on maintaining adequate doses of both drugs throughout the treatment period, the emergence of hematological side effects is expected and requires intervention. The hematological adverse effects lead to a trade-off between continuing the treatment with optimal dosage, to clear the virus, exacerbating thereby the side effects versus decreasing dosage to relieve severe anemia, reducing thereby the chances of achieving sustained virological response (SVR). Therefore, we aimed at giving Folic acid® and Neurobion® to HCV-infected patients during treatment with different types of PEG-IFN plus ribavirin in an attempt to evaluate its efficacy and safety as a prophylactic treatment to prevent hematological adverse effects. Preventing adverse effects without interfering with the therapeutic efficacy of different types of PEG-IFN plus ribavirin in HCV patients will lead to better health outcomes and improvement in their quality of life (HRQOL).

The standard treatment of chronic hepatitis C infection is pegylated interferon alpha combined with ribavirin. Anaemia is a common complication occurring in up to 30% of subjects. Unfortunately, side effects of interferon and ribavirin therapy can require dose reductions, reducing the likelihood of sustained viral response. Recent data shows that interferon alpha may increase hepcidin (a key iron regulator) production, resulting in impaired iron availability for production of red blood cells. In this study, we will evaluate hepcidin levels in 30 patients with Hepatitis C who are treated with interferon containing regimes. If hepcidin plays a role in interferon-induced anaemia, cheap and readily available oral hepcidin inhibitors could be trialled to potentially reduce the impact of interferon alpha induced anaemia.

To compare the effectiveness, in a real world practice setting in tier 2 cities of China, of Entecavir (ETV) monotherapy and Lamivudine (LAM) based therapies (including LAM monotherapy, de novo LAM + Adefovir [ADV] combination, and early add-on of ADV) among chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who are naive to NUC at enrollment to this study

This multicenter, prospective, observational study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of Pegasys (peginterferon alfa-2a) in routine clinical practice in patients with HBeAg-positive or HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. Eligible patients receiving treatment with Pegasys according to standard of care and the summary od product characteristics/local labelling will be followed for the duration of treatment and up to 2 years of follow-up.

This study was to predict 3-month mortality risk of acute-on-chronic hepatitis B liver failure (ACHBLF) on an individual patient level using artificial neural network (ANN) system. The area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) were calculated for ANN and MELD-based scoring systems to evaluate the performances of the ANN prediction.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) chronic infection affects 200 million people worldwide. HCV antiviral treatment has evolved rapidly since 2011. The use of pegylated interferon (PEG-INF) with ribavirin (RBV) has supposed high serious adverse events (SAEs) and low efficacy, especially in patients with cirrhosis. The introduction of 1st generation protease inhibitors (PIs) in genotype-1 (GT1) HCV, such as boceprevir (BOC) and telaprevir (TVR), improved the efficacy but increased the SAEs. Currently, interferon-free direct-acting antivirals (IF-DAAs) achieve great effectiveness with minimum SAEs. However, studies evaluating efficacy and safety of DAAs in cirrhotic patients are limited in real clinical practice. The aim of our study is to evaluate in HCV-cirrhotic patients the efficacy and safety of 3 treatment strategies (PEG-IFN/RBV, PEG-IFN/RBV/PIs, and IF-DAAs) in routine practice according to European guidelines from 2010 to 2015. The secondary aim is to evaluate the impact of sustained virological response on gastroesophageal varices (GOV).

Chronic hepatitis C infection (HCV) is a disease that affects worldwide about 170 million people. The previous standard of care therapy of chronic HCV patients consists of pegylated-IFN-α combined with ribavirin, and results in sustained clearance of HCV-RNA in only about 50% of the HCV genotype 1 infected patients. Telaprevir, a NS3A-4A inhibitor, has previously proven to offer therapeutic options to previous non-responders to the standard of care. Although, not all chronic HCV patients benefit from telaprevir and it is still not known why certain patients are also non-responsive to this triple therapy. In this study we try to understand why certain patients are also non-responsive to telaprevir, how triple therapy modulates the responsiveness to IFN-α and what the immunological consequences are of treatment with telaprevir, either directly or as a result of telaprevir-induced reduction of HCV-RNA levels.