Active clinical trials for "Hepatitis"

In Taiwan, non-cirrhosis CHB patients with mildly elevated ALT are not candidates for antiviral treatment under Taiwan NIH reimbursement criteria. Disease severity could range from mildly liver injury to cirrhosis in this group of patients. There is a substantial population of patients required antiviral treatment, but not fulfill the criteria of reimbursement treatment. For the 2 phase 3 trials of TAF, the treatment criteria of ALT were more than 2x of ULN and did not included liver biopsy as a pre-treatment assessment. In this study, CHB patient with ALT level of 1-2x ULN and significant liver injury evaluated by liver biopsy is the target study population.

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of PEG-IFNα alone or in combination with different dose levels of BRII-835 (VIR-2218) in participants with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection.

The goal of this clinical trial is to test ISA104 in patients with chronic hepatitis B. The main question[s] it aims to answer are: How safe is ISA104? Does ISA104 induce immunity against hepatitis B virus? Different doses of the vaccine ISA104 will be administered to participants. These participants are chronic HBV patients being actively treated with antiviral drugs. Researchers will compare the ISA104 vaccine to a placebo.

The goal of this clinical study is to learn more about GS-2829 and GS-6779 in healthy participants and participants with CHB.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) disproportionally affects certain populations, including those facing substance use and mental health challenges. In the past, many individuals with mental illness were not treated due to the psychiatric side-effects of interferon. However, the development of highly effective, direct-acting antivirals (DAA) has revolutionized HCV treatment such that cure rates are >95% with 8-12 weeks of simple, safe, and well-tolerated therapy. A recent systematic review reported that across 13 North American studies, HCV prevalence among people admitted to psychiatric hospitals was a staggering 17.4% (13.2-22.6%). Despite these concerning figures, mental health facilities have not been a focus of HCV elimination efforts to date. The Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) in Toronto is the largest mental health facility in Canada, with a psychiatric emergency department seeing ~35 patients per day with many admitted to the acute psychiatric units for safety and stabilization. Currently, psychiatric patients screened for HCV at CAMH have a 75% 'no show' rate at the Toronto Centre for Liver Disease (TCLD), which is located less than 5km away, suggesting that referral upon discharge is ineffective. This study will be the first trial to evaluate whether it would be feasible and beneficial to initiate treatment during an acute psychiatric admission rather than referring to specialty upon discharge. The combination of broad HCV screening with rapid linkage to treatment has led to successful elimination of HCV within defined populations, so-called micro-elimination. The investigators hypothesize that HCV treatment can be effectively delivered by providers in psychiatric care facilities, which will improve treatment uptake over traditional referral models.

A Randomized Study of ALG-000184 Drug to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics After Single and Multiple Doses in Healthy Volunteers and CHB Subjects

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ASC22 in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B after single and multiple drug administration.

GC002 is a Phase I trial to evaluate the safety and the immune responses of a lentiviral based HCV immunotherapy (HCVax™) in chronic HCV patients.

This study is to investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of Nucleoside (acid) analogues treatment in patients with normal Alanine Aminotransferase and positive Hepatitis B virus DNA.

The investigators have designed a community-based intervention study to all subjects attended in drug addiction centers screened for hepatitis C virus (HCV) to evaluate the efficacy and acceptance of a telemedicine based programme versus conventional healthcare assistance