search

Active clinical trials for "Hernia"

Results 171-180 of 1083

Onlay Synthetic Bioabsorbable Mesh Herniorrhaphy Versus Herniorrhaphy Only in the Primary Treatment...

Large Hiatal Hernia

The large hiatal hernia (LHH) now represents approximately 50% of laparoscopic antireflux surgical practice. In a non-comparative retrospective study of 399 patients operated for LHH with onlay patch of a bioprosthetic absorbable (Gore® Bio-A® HH0710) mesh with a mean follow-up of 44 months, 16% had a symptomatic recurrence with 7,9% requiring reoperation, one patient had oesophageal stenosis. No comparative effectiveness data exist to date. Hypothesis: the incidence of postoperative hiatus hernia would be reduced by the addition of biosynthetic absorbable mesh reinforcement to a standardized suture repair technique, as compared to laparoscopic repair without mesh, without increasing the risk of complications. The main objective is to compare the radiologic recurrence rate at 2 years between standardized herniorrhaphy with onlay biosynthetic absorbable mesh repair versus standardized herniorrhaphy with no mesh in symptomatic LHH.

Not yet recruiting16 enrollment criteria

Impact of Cervical Parameters to Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injection Treatment Outcomes in Patients...

Cervical Disc Herniation

This study is aim to disclose the effect of cervical parameters, whether they change the outcomes of epidural steroid injection treatment in patients with cervical disc herniation. The patients who had cervical disc herniation and had been performed interlaminar epidural steroid injection were included. We hypothesized that participants with abnormal cervical spine alignment parameters were less likely to benefit from treatment.

Recruiting12 enrollment criteria

Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) Umbilical Hernia Repair (UHR) Absorbable vs Non-absorbable Synthetic...

Umbilical Hernia

The goal of this study is to see which of two types of mesh is better for fixing an umbilical hernia. One type of mesh is an absorbable synthetic mesh, which goes away on its own in the body, and the other type of mesh is a non-absorbable mesh, which stays in the body forever. The researchers will check if the hernia comes back, how it affects the patient's quality of life, and if there are any problems after the surgery during a three-year period.

Not yet recruiting6 enrollment criteria

Investigation of the Effect of Motor Imagery Training in Individuals With Cervical Discogenic Pain...

ImageBody2 more

In this study, motor control exercises including cervical region, upper extremity and scapular region muscles will be applied routinely in individuals with chronic neck pain. The application will been investigating, called motor imagery training, will been carried out together with motor control exercises.

Not yet recruiting9 enrollment criteria

Different Laparoscopic Techniques for Management of Congenital Inguinal Hernia in Pediatrics

Congenital Inguinal Hernia

Comparison between multiple approaches of laparoscopic hernia ( percutaneous assisted laparoscopic hernia, purse string closure of hernial sac, total dissection of hernial sac).

Not yet recruiting4 enrollment criteria

Robotic Versus Open Comparison in the Surgical Treatment of Wide Abdominal Wall Hernias

Ventral Incisional Hernia

In the treatment of ventral incisional hernias, a mesh repair in the retromuscular plane is considered as the gold standard. To allow for adequate medialization of the fascial borders and a complete closure of the defect in case of large incisional hernias, component separation techniques are increasingly being used. When compared to anterior component separation, posterior component separation by transversus abdominis release (TAR) seems to decrease postoperative wound problems. While laparoscopic techniques pose significant difficulties to perform TAR minimally invasively (mainly due to ergonomic and technical reasons), these limitations seem to be overcome by robotic platforms. Initial retrospective patient series report on significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay and fewer complications after robotic transversus abdominis release (rTAR), when compared to open transversus abdominis release (oTAR). High-quality prospective evidence on rTAR is currently lacking.

Not yet recruiting10 enrollment criteria

A Prospective Randomised Multi - Center Trial on the Repair of Large Hiatal Hernias: Absorbable...

Hiatal Hernia

A prospective randomised multi - center trial on the repair of large hiatal hernias with sutures versus pledgeted sutures versus absorbable mesh The primary objective of the present trial is to compare the hiatal hernia recurrence rate between three different methods of cruroplasty in large hiatal hernias: hiatal closure with sutures versus pledgeted sutures versus absorbable mesh (Phasix™ST mesh). The duration of the study is not limited and depends on the number of cases planned. After enrollment in the study, patients will be followed - up with standardized questionnaires and gastroscopy at 6 months, 1 year, 3 years and 5 years after surgery.

Not yet recruiting12 enrollment criteria

Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Add by Annuloplasty and Nucleoplasty

Lumbar Disc Herniation

Recently, percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) is also commonly performed for lumbar disc herniation. Following discectomy, the relief of leg pain is common; however, the relief of back pain is less predictable. The association of back pain and lumbar disc herniation is still unclear. PELD and Annuloplasty (PELDA) can relieve back pain associated with disc herniation as well as leg pain through decompression and thermal ablation of annular defects in selected patients. Another problem that rapidly increasing go along with the growing number of microdiscectomies is directly proportional to the number of patients who undergo re-operations due to recurrences. The surgical treatment can be helpful in prevention of re-operations is nucleoplasty. Endoscopic discectomy for lumbosacral herniation supplemented with nucleoplasty can reduce the recurrence and reoperation rates.

Not yet recruiting5 enrollment criteria

Laparoscopic Primary Diaphragm Versus Mesh Repair for Hiatus Hernia: a Long-Term Follow-Up

HerniaHiatal5 more

Assessment of the recurrence of hiatal hernia five to ten years after repair using sutures versus sutures reinforced with non-absorbable mesh.

Not yet recruiting6 enrollment criteria

MESH MIGRATION IN TOTAL EXTRAPERITONEAL INGUINAL HERNI REPAIR

Inguinal Hernia

Inguinal henri repair is among the most common operations performed by general surgery. The use of laparoscopy in inguinal hernia repair is becoming more common day by day. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is being applied with increasing frequency due to its advantages such as reducing postoperative pain, providing early return to work and increasing patient satisfaction. Due to the widespread use of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, the best fixation method for the patches has become an increasingly questionable subject. It is thought that fixation of the patch with staples or clips may reduce the slippage of the patch, thus reducing the risk of hernia recurrence. In addition, it has been stated that the use of these fixation materials will both increase the cost and cause acute and chronic pain after surgery. In some studies in the literature, it was determined that not detecting the patch in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair did not increase the recurrence. There are some studies showing that failure to fix the patch causes patch slippage in unilateral laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. In this study, it was planned to investigate the rate of displacement of the patches fixed with staples in patches that do not require fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair surgeries, compared to the ones that were not fixed, and whether they cause recurrence. At the same time, whether the staples used for patch fixation increase postoperative pain will be evaluated with VAS (visual analog scale) at the postoperative 1st day, 1st month and 6th month after the operation, compared to the group without stapler patch fixation.

Not yet recruiting2 enrollment criteria
1...171819...109

Need Help? Contact our team!


We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs